this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
666 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7664 readers
960 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 162 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

And they achieved... what exactly?

More faces per book? Instant Instagram? Whatsapp is now appier? Finally copied Second Life in meta horizons?

Like... What does $221,000,000/month of AI even get you?

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They added legs to horizon world!

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dang, and right after it shut down, what a bummer.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 9 points 2 weeks ago

I guess it didn't have "legs" after all.

THEY ADDED $221,000,000 to the GDP every month!! see, the economy is doing great

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And they achieved… what exactly?

I sometimes wonder whether AI is just a way to launder money at the same time as burning the planet.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

The big push happened right after the crypto crash. I have a suspicion both are pushed by energy companies. If power consumption goes down, we start switching to renewables and stop consuming dirty sources. They can't have that, so they pushed crypto to consume it. They let it crash because they started pushing "AI" instead. Politicians always say we can't decrease power consumption, and we just need to build up to replace dirty energy sometimes in the non-specified future. We will never reach that if they can instead keep creating excuses to expand demand.

The app is falling apart. From marketplace discussions the link back to the listing is mostly broken. The app crashes frequently. Images and video will glitch back and forth by several pixels, randomly.

I think they are doing a massive study on how automating code production kills products. It is a brave move and I look forward to the papers they publish when the company folds.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

Got more work done that doesn't matter and also atrophied their workers mind.

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right? I haven't noticed anything change, everything is as buggy, slow, and difficult to use as it ever was.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The dark patterns on meta products are downright evil, and infuriating. How anyone can stay on their products baffles me. They punish you for using it.

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Only decent way to see local events and updates on stuff happening in my area, also most people use marketplace so it's how I find stuff to buy locally.

Facebook with ublock and a userscript to clean all the crap off it is at least generally usable.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 2 weeks ago

You make the mistake of assuming any of that matters.

You're talking devotees of the LessWrong crowd. The self-proclaimed "rationalists". They are quite literally a religious cult that worships AI. (I know this sounds deranged. That's because it is deranged!) The money is beside the point to them. What matters is that they trigger the Singularity so that the Rococo Basilisk (I know that's not the proper name: my artistic license number is MY0B) doesn't torment their simulacra for eternity.

No. I'm not making any of that up. (Except that it's Rocco's Basilisk.)

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Wasted some water, electricity, released some heat to the atmosphere…

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

May have proved senior engineers are more effective having a team of agents rather than a team of junior engineers

Doubt that is the case, but that is likely what all these middle managers expect in these companies

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

An agent can produce code quickly, but at the accuracy level of a co-op unless a significant amount of time is spent to "prepare" the agent. Trouble is, you have to know how to do the job you're asking the agent to do to be able to effectively steer it to an acceptable solution.

With a co-op (or junior engineer), I still need to do the equivalent of the above to train them on the tasks/concepts they need to perform their work, I still need to have a firm grasp of what it is that I'm asking them to do to be able to guide them to the correct solution.

The difference is that the co-op/junior retains that knowledge and is able to extrapolate that to different situations as well as come up with innovative solutions based on that initial knowledge. One of the biggest risks to tech work from LLMs (aside from the general problems with LLMs) is it encourages managers to not hire juniors/co-ops, which means that there will be no new generation of senior developers coming up to replace us when we retire (lol, as if).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

Management has proven to the board that they're using the technology everybody in corporate likes. They'll surely get a bonus for that. And once it's obvious it fails they'll lay off thousands to compensate for the billions spent and get a bonus for the thorough cost cutting. Then hire a bunch offshore to get work done.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There is some quite hot water now, don't talk that down!

Edit: ah, another one was first...
Should read the comments, but sometimes the urge is overwhelming...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ncsk@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is that cost in electricity cost? Or they are not using their own AI models?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Their models suck, if they didn’t they’d sell them.

Edit to add: they’re selling access to their GPUs, that’s how bad and under used their models are. Again, if their own models were any good, someone would use them.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago

They have their own models, it depends on a teams manager and a few other constraints if they are required to use them or if they are pestered to use generative models at all.

I'm betting that cost is just the cost for the token usage and nothing else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _fryerDan@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

im required to use ai at my job. they don't pay attention to what i do with it. so it now answers my emails 1 business day after i receive them, and responds (appropriately) that im working on their request and ill check back in with them with progress. its a constant loop.

its funny how many tasks in corporate america get forgotten bc they weren't executed immediately :D

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Zuck the Fuck has proved time and again that he is completely bankrupt of ideas or vision.

  • Facebook he stole from the Winkelvoss (sp?) twins
  • Instagram he bought
  • Threads he copied from Mastodon
  • GIPHY he bought
  • Messenger he bought
  • Kustomer he bought

... and I'll stop there because that list is endless, seemingly.

Things he actually did himself under his own "vision" such as it is?:

  • the Metaverse, something he went so all-in on that he changed his company name to suit the new vision; the Metaverse is now officially shut down because it was too embarrassing turning on the lights in an empty hall

Now he's going to tout his new direction of AI, but ... ah ... that's all purchased too:

  • Manus AI
  • WaveForms AI
  • Moltbook
  • PlayAI

The dude is creatively and morally bankrupt, and at the rate he's burning cash in this latest corporate turn, he'll be fiscally bankrupt in no time flat as well. Zuck the Fuck is like Melon Husk Lite: All the idiocy, half the cash.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine you have to go on with a company name that is the worst failure in your company's history? Every time you say the company name, you are referencing what a loser you are.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 5 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine being Mark Zucke...

Oh. Right. That's what you said! 🤣

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the metaverse

But did you see the legs? Impressive.

[–] white_nrdy@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

He also doesn't even deserve credit for the idea for thn Metaverse. He literally stole the premise and the name from Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Surprisingly difficult to find a source on this that isn't a Twitter Screenshot of some right-wing grifter's account.

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/tokenminimizing-meta-moves-curb-employee-ai-usage-ai-costs-reach-billions

This seems to be it, but I don't think there's currently a working paywall bypass for the information (solid site, though).

https://mlq.ai/news/meta-caps-internal-ai-token-spending-after-costs-approach-billions-in-2026/

This might be that article, but not entirely sure. Ironically, that site seems to be another questionable AI project.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be so funny if meta was to go broke over AI usage. One can dream

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Alright, taxpayers, bail em out!

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd like to join the chorus of people saying "Zuckerberg will be bankrupt soon", but I said the same thing about Musk and he became a trillionaire

People will continue to use his dumb products, not in the least cause he does his best to monopolize any market he's in

[–] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago

The system prevents people this rich from going down. He could literally toss a coin on every decision and at the end of the year he will be richer than before. These people basically cannot stop themselves from getting richer.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope Cuckerberg is bankrupt at the end of this AI clusterfuck.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

And in prison.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and that is not even the actual cost, because the vendors are still not making a profit.

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

The actual cost is a livable environment

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Observe the dead-eyed stare into the middle distance.

He almost looks human in that photo.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Someone tell madame toussaud her museum got robbed again

[–] X@piefed.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Is this whole token thing really just the same as paid in-game currencies, just designed to get you to not think about the fact that you’re spending money? Or is there another use for it?

[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Tokens are an AI context of units of text. Could be a character or a word. Why use the term tokens instead of words? Who knows. Maybe because some units aren’t words? The tech industry delights in creating stupid terms for things that already had terms.

[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe some units aren't words

Well, yeah. You answered yourself?

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 weeks ago

A token can range from individual letters to several words in a stock phrase, from what little I understand. It's a piece of whatever they're doing behind the scenes leaking into the public-facing terminology.

According to my SO, it's safe enough to just say "a token is a word" as long as you remember this is only an approximation.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

There are to many words to have each be it's own input, but bundling frequently used snippets is more efficient than using characters.
Then the investors came and decided to measure success by wasted energy and the rest is history.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Tokens are pretty much the compute used for one word, approximately, or some other information of a similar size. (Long words are two or three tokens each actually)

Then, yes those tokens are paid for with "credits" which is them gamifying the purchase lol

[–] X@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

And the marketplace search is still a broken pile of shit...wish everyone didn't jump to it and stayed on CL...

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure making Instagram clog my feed with suggested posts and other shit I don't follow has done wonders for their engagement metrics. I really love how meme posts and other shares are now clogging that shit up as well.

It's definitely not a main contributor to what made me finally delete my Facebook. Kind of ironic that, given how much of my data they scrape, they still couldn't piece that together.

load more comments
view more: next ›