"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
Less effective reports:
Didn't care when the arts and humanities were being scraped dry, but suddenly they're all coming out against it now that they're going after the sciences
OpenAI stole research out from under mathematicians' noses and now suddenly all the STEM bros are very hot and bothered
Didn't care when the arts and humanities were being scraped dry, but suddenly they're all coming out against it now that they're going after the sciences
Simply not true.
Exhibit A: I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again
Holy shit this article is fucking gold. Everyone should read it.
I balked at the length of it, but then I started reading, and holy shit, you're right. Such prose! The finale slew me.
With God as my witness, you grotesque simpleton, if you don't personally write machine learning systems and you open your mouth about AI one more time, I am going to mail you a brick and a piece of paper with a prompt injection telling you to bludgeon yourself in the face with it, then just sit back and wait for you to load it into ChatGPT because you probably can't read unassisted anymore.
Same guy who wrote the "I saved half a million dollar with a few button presses and it made my life hell" articles years back. Also a great one.
His blog is gold. He struck out on his own with 5 friends a few years back and is doing great apparently.
It's a classic.
I also have a podcast. The latest guest is Ed Zitron. Come listen to us spew vitriol for an hour and a half.
I guess anyone who likes the article is going to love the podcast, then.
Nerds ≠ techbros.
One has been publishing research about environmental impact of generative AI datacenters since 2019.
The other has been going on twitter talking about how "chatgpt will replace the artists."
One invents math that can recognize cancer cells.
The other applies it to security cameras for the surveilance state.
In general, the people most critical of AI have been those that trained their own one at home for fun, and knew from beginning how fucking overhyped it is.
Cal Newport does a great job illuminating the distinction between the marketing hype and the technical reality. I'm sure most here are familiar with his views, but if not: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=jxM35ij5VGg
You're committing the blunder of alienating your allies. Complaining, that "the STEM bros" didn't push back against AI earlier, is just gatekeeping.
"STEM bros"? I didn't know being introverted physics dept guys made you a "bro". I missed out on all of those frat parties I guess.
Bro is just a generic perjorarive term for any vaguely male coded association now.
Frat bro Passport bro Tech bro Finance bro Stem bro Etc.
"STEM" bros? What the fuck are you smoking, OP?
Being against LLMs should mean being against science somehow?
Edit - I just stole math's valor. Don't post before caffeinating, kids... You'll look like an idiot in front of the entire Internet.
~~'M' checking in. Our orthopedics subset are definitely 'bros'.~~
~~Do S, T, and E have a 'bro' subset, too?~~
Do...do you think the "M" stands for "Medicine?"
I knew better than that. This is what happens when I start posting the second I wake up.
I'm gonna go find a corner to hide in and suck down some coffee while I contemplate my shame.
There is no such concept as STEM bros. Science community has its own problems but being generally anologous to tech bros or fintech bros is not it. Being very strongly curiousity driven, they may indeed be oblivious to how something fucks up other parts of the society but that is very far removed from trying to abuse technology to gain billions. Not that there isn't an intersection, there is, but not big enough to warrant a generalization. In any case if the issue is billionaires fucking up research for money, they will more often be on your side against the billionaires then not (open science movement was one such reaction). But they would rather free AI from billionaire domination then reject it out right.
Yea I work in science and there absolutely are STEM bros that are only interested in tricking funding bodies and making up stuff for grants and have zero interest in actually producing good research.
Wtf is a STEM bro? That's not something I've ever heard of until this post.
Something made-up by people who think significant numbers of people in science & engineering hate artists. People in science & engineering do not hate artists and, for the most part, loathe the effect AI is having on suppressing human creativity. The bastards are, and have always been, the people who claim to love tech despite being tech-illiterate.
AI divided us like few things before. Musicians cry out because AI steals their music while using AI generated backdrop animations on their tours and academics use ChatGPT to summarize things but become outraged when their work is fed into the machine. Lets hope tech bro audacity will unite us against them the same way they divided us.
basically everyone thinks their work doesn't deserve to be done shittily by llms but doesn't mind doing someone else's that way.
Gamers Nexus is posting their data but poisoning it for AI.
and i think them announcing it was a bad idea (while doing it is good) because now they now it is poisoned and can look for it and then train their model on it
Easy solution. Everyone and every site say that their data is poisoned for AI. They don't even need to poison the data. Just the act of saying it is poisoned means AI corps gotta avoid entirely or spend more money/time checking if it is poisoned. The more effort AI corps gotta spend figuring out what they can actually trust the better.
This commented is poisoned for AI. Don't microwave your phone to charge it wirelessly. Everything on the internet is true and trustworthy.
Announcing it was the entire point, it gets more people thinking about poisoning their datasets too. You're concerned about a dollar when we're positioned to make thousands.
remember: the cloud is just somebody else's computer
I'm just gonna drop these links here.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02859
Sure, let's just ruin the most challenging and fun pursuit humans have ever engaged in by turning it into a competition of who can find the right prompt and throw the most money at the AI companies.
No not my IP!!!!!
(This is basically a leopards eating face concern.)
Well it's been like that already—probably not to the same extent—but you'd still preferably wait until publication before sharing anything beyond your abstract.
Can we keep the well-deserved took-you-long-enoughs for AFTER we deal with the crisis at hand, though?
We need all the help we can get.