Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I believe, and this is as diplomatic as I care to be, that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state and that a national approach could prevent that.
On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.
On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale
I think that's more likely
That's really pretty standard Democrat fake leftist strategy - only openly advocate for a leftist proposal when there's no chance that it'll pass.
that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state
If they are not paying taxes anyway, why would that even matter?
It’s not that they are providing $0 in tax income, it’s that it’s nearly 0%. It’s still a chunk of change.
I’ve heard that we wouldn’t feel the impact for 25 years.
Even so, kick them out. They can live in beautiful Houston Texas, or sunny Arkansas. Or maybe they will decide paying up is worth the cost of being a resident of California
Except evidence doesn't support mass flight of the rich with higher taxes anyway.
It's all bluster. When you have households and businesses both supported by dozens to hundreds of employees you can't simply sell your house and buy a new one. You'd need all new staff to cater to your needs, would have to get new business licensing and real estate for your businesses to move, there's just a whole lot more than pulling up stakes and moving state when you're a fat ass dragon sitting on a hoard of stolen gold.
"I can't tax billionaires in California, because they'd leave California"
"I can't tax billionaires nationally, because they'd leave the nation"
"I can't tax billionaires globally, because they'd leave the planet"
There will never be a finish line in front of which these billionaire-class guardians won't shuffle their feet, nor a goalpost that they won't carry further. It's some real "I'll release my taxes after I get elected" energy.
We don't even need a billionaire's tax for an "economic reset". I mean, we do because it's not healthy for our economy or our political system. But what will happen with a billionaire's tax? The money will just go to the government, which will spend it in arcane ways that the average person has little visibility or voice on.
What we need is an increase to the minimum wage to whatever it would've been if it hadn't been consistently frozen and re-frozen and with mandatory CoLA, universal healthcare, repeal of Citizens United, repeal of whatever decision it was that said a company's ultimate responsibility is to shareholders, a breakup of a whole bunch of overweighted conglomerates, a breakup of media empires, a ban on "entertainment" masquerading as "news", a reform of the Supreme Court, vetc. There's a whole bunch of other stuff as well. But there's a whole bunch of stuff that could get accomplished without a billionaire's tax.
Taxing billionaires would benefit regular people even if the government burned the money. Or buried it. It would reduce the price of assets, like housing, and make them more affordable for regular people.
Sure, it would be better spend the money on healthcare or infrastructure, but even if we just subsidized the underwater basketweaving industry, we would still be better off.
once he become president he is going to champion a world billionaire tax and say no to a national one.
he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state and that a national approach could prevent that
Not sure about his motivations, but we absolutely cannot be playing states off of one another to see who can bend over the hardest for the Epstein Class.
Fuck that noise.
On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.
The idiots, aka 99%of voters, will only remember him promoting the national billionaire tax.
My thoughts exactly
wasn't this asshole against the billionaire tax in California?
Yes, but then he realized that showing his whole ass before his presidential campaign/election was a bad strategy. He's in damage control mode. If elected, I'm sure he'll flip back to not wanting it again.
"Now is not the time. We have more important matters to focus on"
Gets nothing done regarding any of those matters.
He's an opportunist first and everything else second. Flip flopping is kind of what he does.
He flips flops all the time I only trust his actions which are very much not good.
What an absolute fucking snake. He's been opposing the billionaires tax in Cali and now he wants to say it should be national where there is no chance of passage?
Fuck this guy.
So he’s against the state level one that actually has a chance of passing, but for a national one that has zero chance, neat.
Too little too late for Newsome. He’s had plenty of years to talk up a rich tax. Dude is capitalizing on the rhetoric. Like thanks but no thanks bud. We don’t need a yes man. Need someone with actual ideals
This asshole brought on Sharpio and other right wing grifters to agree with on his podcast but won't talk to real leftists.
I've totally soured on his bullshit. It's all just an intern clapping back at Trump in Twitter, otherwise this is just Hillary Clinton in a man's body.
Business corporate Democrat to the core.
He is a 2 faced centrist, family friends with Pelosi. He wont do it.
How brave to insist one something he can't deliver until after he is voted in as pres. I'd be more inclined to believe him if he actually supported the CA wealth tax
Californians are proposing a billionaire tax and he promised to veto it.
Also, we don't want a stake in AI. We want to burn it to the fucking ground because it's ruining everything right now.
Newsom is such a duplicitous motherfucker.
It's all a smokescreen. He's not proposing a national wealth tax, just another minimum income tax. Which they won't care about because they don't earn significant income.
Newsom said he supports “a true minimum tax on billionaires — a modern Buffett Rule — that ensures the people at the very top pay at least the tax rate their own workers pay.”
Crushes it in his state and then pretends to support it nationally. All with what time he has to spare from praising Israel, of course.
Because he knew it would pass in California but likely fail nationwide.
I don’t want any stake in the future being built by AI because I don’t want the future being built by AI
Yeah, you're not gonna get your credibility with me back, bud.
I think Gaven Newsom should have all of his possessions thrown away.
I think Gavin Newsome should stub both his little toes, one after the other.
I don't believe this asshole.
What stands in their way is the federal tax code, a corporate code, and an inheritance code
Not that Prop 13 is Newsom's doing, but it's kind of rich hearing that from the governor of a feudal state with landed gentry. For those not in the know, Prop 13 allows a person to buy a house and pay a low property tax for the duration of their ownership. This low rate is reset when selling the house, but it is transferable to offspring. It's an actual law that creates a class of property-owning elite. The kind of NIMBYs who pay nothing to their community while voting down new housing or anything else that would threaten their property value.
Fine words, but does he have the credibility to back it up?
He does not
Nope while his actions prove he won't actually go for it.
This bowl of fuckwit oatmeal is going to be the DNC nominee for prez, isn't he? We are soooo fucked!
Can someone just nuke us or slam a gigantic meteorite into us? Just end it already, I'm tired of suffering under these fools and mouth-breathers.
Asteroid availability scan complete: one can be hurled your way now, will you be home to sign for delivery in 16 million years?
😂🤷🏻♀️
Couldn't even win Florida wearing those flip-flops.
While he fights against any "economic justice" in California, I trust his actions more than talk.
Dude is late to the party. Always is always will. I don’t true him to be true, he’s a reactive clown. Great twitter but he’s too center and that what we are going to see in this, it’s going to be half ass.
Millionaires too, but we can start with the billionaires and up. It would be nice if we could replace capital gains with a system that actually taxes their assets rather than what they get when they sell those assets, but that'll never fucking happen
So, think they'll use THE PARLIAMENTARIAN excuse again for this one, if they can't avoid winning congress?
Trump~ "No more wars!"
Biden~ "Higher minimum wage!"
Trump~ "I will build a wall!"
Obama~ "Universal healthcare!"
Bush~ "Christ is in my heart!"
Clinton~ "Universal healthcare!"
