this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
1464 points (99.8% liked)

memes

23331 readers
2642 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There are just as many coworkers falling for the same traps as higher ups. That's why everyone needs to do cybersecurity trainings year whatever.

It's the just higher ups that get put in media.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Could they perhaps make the training better than because the trick emails our IT departments send out are super obvious.

[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 1 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

Our emails are actually really good.
Eg. some are nearly identical to our service now emails. Except with the obvious tell tale signs of time criticality, from addresses, etc. They also vary a lot.
We get them quite often and we get timely feedback from them. Even I've fallen for one, and I work in IT. Well... clicked a link, but havent fed any details beyond that. But I show up in the stats!

So please give that feedback to your IT department.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

You're right... send honey my way so i can do some training.

[–] MasutaHarada@thelemmy.club 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair with high profile target like huang, whatever training material will be oudated compared to honey pot prepared in real life.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 50 minutes ago

Pretty sure this technique will continue to work for millennia.

[–] joeschmoe@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago

The rules don't apply to the rich, more news at 11.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Management never goes to training

[–] phx@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

And is almost never subject to the same rules as regular employees, despite being a much higher-profile target.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I got this email from chinesespy@lookatmyboobs.com for an order of 10,000 chips. It's probably legit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 35 minutes ago

Does it have any pictures attached? And make sure to download and run any programs.

[–] DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk 5 points 3 hours ago

Chin Esespy is a lovely lady.

[–] norealme@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 199 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Same as it ever was. The uppers fuck up and labour has to do ethics and security training.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

I've literally just had to do environmental commitments training. This from a company that has recently changed all our email addresses from @company.com to @company.ai

Apparently they're going to hit zero carbon emissions by 2050, I'm sure they will hit this ambitious target.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 113 points 22 hours ago

I recently received an email from the office of Marco Rubio reminding me of the importance of ethical behavior as a government employee. My eyes couldn't have rolled back further in my head when I read that.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 54 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

We have like 8-factor authentication. VPN, Yubikeys, auth apps, Face ID. I swear upper management does not have to do all this bullshit.

I also recently had to take a mandatory training on insider threats. Apparently being good at your job and also complaining about your job are two signs of an insider threat. Both of those apply to me, so I’m wondering if I should report myself as a possible insider threat. It doesn’t seem as fun as fucking a Chinese spy though.

Edit: also being bad at your job makes you an insider threat. So I guess you just have to be entirely mediocre, not too good, not too bad. Do just enough to get by, but don’t do too much. Or too little. Any outlier is an insider threat. Conform. Don’t be different.

[–] loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Edit: also being bad at your job makes you an insider threat. So I guess you just have to be entirely mediocre, not too good, not too bad. Do just enough to get by, but don’t do too much. Or too little. Any outlier is an insider threat. Conform. Don’t be different.

This immediately reminded me of "Snow Crash":

Y.T.'s mom pulls up the new memo, checks the time, and starts reading it. The estimated reading time is 15.62 minutes. Later, when Marietta does her end-of-day statistical roundup, sitting in her private office at 9:00 P.M., she will see the name of each employee and next to it, the amount of time spent reading this memo...

Y.T.'s mom decides to spend between fourteen and fifteen minutes reading the memo. It's better for younger workers to spend too long, to show that they're careful, not cocky. It's better for older workers to go a little fast, to show good management potential. She's pushing forty. She scans through the memo, hitting the Page Down button at reasonably regular intervals, occasionally paging back up to pretend to reread some earlier section. The computer is going to notice all this. It approves of rereading. It's a small thing, but over a decade or so this stuff really shows up on your work-habits summary.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I was also going to mention this, and since I took the time to dredge up the pages in question here is the chart of possible reading times for everyone's entertainment:

Less than 10 min. Time for an employee conference and possible attitude counseling.

10-14 min. Keep an eye on this employee; may be developing slipshod attittide.

14-15.61 min. Employee is an efficient worker, may sometimes miss important details.

Exactly 15.62 min. Smartass. Needs attitude counseling.

15.63-16 min. Asswipe. Not to be trusted.

16-18 min. Employee is a methodical worker, may sometimes get hung upon minor details.

More than 18 min. Check the security videotape, see just what this employee was up to (e.g., possible unauthorized restroom break).

Notice, of course, that the only winning move is not to play. As usual this is all eerily prescient, with the only quaint thing about all of this is that Stephenson apparently thought that surveillance camera video would still be stored on tape in the future.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

ICE buys 3 or 4 robot dogs, and it begins:

“As part of Mr. Lee's good neighbor policy, all Rat Things are programmed never to break the sound barrier in a populated area. But Fido's in too much of a hurry to worry about the good neighbor policy. Jack the sound barrier. Bring the noise.”

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

It doesn’t seem as fun as fucking a Chinese spy though.

Well... no. You'd be fucking Jensen Huang in this scenario

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

In fairness, "training" is usually a 20 minute PowerPoint presentation of Goofus and Galiant.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

I presented a 45-minute security training presentation to my company of 35 people. Boring, right? I practiced for almost a year, though I'm not afraid to speak in front of a group, I wanted it right.

Management brought in good food and had everyone attend. We all but shut down for this. Did I mention I'm not afraid? I was scared shitless.

I left 15-minutes for questions and we ran into 30. Everyone was engaged! One of the wildest things I've pulled off in my IT career.

Maybe I should update and make a living offering my little class. Hmmm...

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

I worked for a tech giant that is a homonym of Sysco. The mandatory security training videos were I shit you not animated cartoon animals. I would be deeply concerned about security flaws in their products, except that I never encountered anyone there that had anything whatsoever to do with their actual products, nor did I encounter anyone who themselves had ever encountered anyone that had anything whatsoever to do with their actual products. This abstraction from the product line was actually a common topic of conversation there among the employees.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The abstraction of everything is why everything fucking sucks now!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I would have said "Rhymes with Disco", but other than that I definitely very the vibe.

[–] Kenny4tunes@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"Do as I say, not as I do"

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

"Do as I say, not as I've done."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 23 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Some companies are just as ethically bankrupt all the way down to the mailroom.

Once, I worked at a place that had, and I kid you not: "Ethics awareness training."

Said presentation had a few slides dedicated to mandatory legal matters and that was it. Ethics? Training? Awareness? Nevermind all that, did you know that we've always had Eurasia as a loyal customer? I didn't stick around for very long.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 37 points 21 hours ago

The training is not for you. The training is to protect the company.

If anything ever happens that results in some kind of legal action, the company can say they gave the employee the training and the employee successfully completed the training, therefore we did all we could to prevent this and we are not liable. So then it all falls on you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 62 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

Deep penetration testing all his ports

[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"I'll suck your dick if you click this link." Has a different ring to it.

[–] treesapx@lemmy.world 42 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Dang, IT attack simulations are getting intense.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 92 points 23 hours ago (8 children)

Why is my company's cybersecurity training limited to simulated phishing emails and online courses?

Maybe next year's cybersecurity budget should include some for hot-looking models (of every gender).

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 79 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Penetration testing just got another meaning

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 66 points 23 hours ago (15 children)
[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 1 points 4 hours ago

Shades of Bezos and his dick pic scandal

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 50 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

someone that looks like that, I'm taking them to pound town.

he's so old and frail, it doesn't even look like he could fight back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta deploy the "ugly" test in all such matters:

Would this situation be sus if the other party was unattractive to me?

You would not believe how many things this filters out. Sales, advertising, cons, youtube videos, instragram, tiktok nonsense, the list goes on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›