this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2026
278 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck AI

8737 readers
1669 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports:

Less effective reports:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ai industry 'self-regulation':

We can blow up 2000 houses or kill a classroom and a half of people, before we acknowledge we did anything wrong.

[–] SourDragon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You think that'll make them admit to any wrongdoing?

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Nope, insurance won’t allow them to “admit fault.” Everybody is protecting insurance.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

If they do, it will certainly be phrased as:

You're right, I did target a non military location with three consecutive tomahawk missiles. I disregarded the instruction "Do NOT fuck this up!", while creating a target menu and priority list.

Let we walk you through where I went wrong:

... etc.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The price of unwanted, unproven, and unimpressive progress.

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago

the bone crushing machine will continue to crush bones until morale improves!

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We kill a stray pedestrian? NBD. A family of 4? Cost of doing business? A bus full of people? Meh.

50 people? Alright we might have gone a little overboard on the killings

[–] randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

49 people? Nah we're still "good"

[–] felixthecat@fedia.io 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That gives a life value of $20mil a person.

That's what we're all worth according to them

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's a lot higher than the US government values it.

$50,000 per year of quality life (the "dialysis standard",[44] which had been a de facto international standard most private and government-run health insurance plans worldwide use to determine whether to cover a new medical procedure)[45]
$129,000 per year of quality life (an update to the "dialysis standard")[46][45]
$7.5 million (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Jul. 2020)[5]
$9.1 million (Environmental Protection Agency, 2010)[47]
$9.2 million (Department of Transportation, 2014)[48]
$9.6 million (Department of Transportation, Aug. 2016)[49]
$12.5 million (Department of Transportation, 2022)[50]
$13.2 million (Department of Transportation, 2023)[50]
[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

AI used for medical denials will reach that tomorrow.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

they messed up, it was $50 in damages (to Anthropic) or 1 billion deaths.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So a human life is worth about $20,000,000 to Anthropic?

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They must have hit 50 by now. Or are they looking for 50 in a single events?

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

It read as a single event, as in the estimated impact is 50+ people.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

allow the government to block an AI model’s release

So, gambling? It’s going to turn the Commerce Dept in Kalshi for AI?

[–] diz@awful.systems 2 points 3 weeks ago

Skippy: Opening frequently asked questions item "Why can't I kill more than fifty people?" Answer: "The fuck is wrong with? Go see a therapist, psycho. (note to self - rewrite later, do not forget)."

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This reminds me of both the Ford Pinto recall story, and all the Ayn Rand nonsense adventure novels.

A sensible AI safety bill would be like:

The person or organization outsourcing the work to AI is responsible for the damages it causes, including death, injuries, wrongful arrests, financial damages, and discriminatory practices. In case of the AI vendors advertising the models as "infallible", perfect, then they can be also held responsible for the damages.

But techbros don't believe in responsibility, or it is only for the plebs, towards them.

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This is literally Nezek Agavi lol. I shouldn't be surprised when much of palantir and flock are just straight up the same tech used in genocide.

That works out so well for the palastinans I'm glad we get such well thought out protections.