this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
618 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

19479 readers
628 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 141 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why have many monitor when few monitor do trick?

PXL_20211202_035205492

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally a screen wide enough to display a single error in Java.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

oh dear jesus ... this sent me on a spin

[–] ConstructiveVandalism@piefed.zip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so wrong and right on the same time! 

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

29º represent!

[–] mech@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wayland isn't ready until it can do that!

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

It actually can.
No extra protocol should be required for it.

Just needs someone to implement it in their compositor.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Is there any use to having a DMM with a screen that large? (Off topic, but the o-scope caught my eye then the 'mini o-scope')

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago

I literally cannot conceive of a more efficient arrangement of 17 monitors

[–] craigers@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Where can I buy this

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where are you getting so many 1:1 monitors?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 37 points 1 day ago

Ideal aspect ratio for sudoku

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks now someone must redo the optimisation for 16:9 blocks

[–] lemmyartistforhire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Here you go. 22 16:9 monitors.

I chose 22 monitors, because all other numbers have very expected results:

spoiler17 monitors:

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what's that gap for?
You can clearly either fit a few more, or make the total area smaller.

[–] lemmyartistforhire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You are right, actually. I blindly trusted the computer to figure this one out, but just looking at it I found a better solution by hand. Maybe there really are some better solutions for the 22 monitors problem.

spoiler

This better not end up in any scientific papers, ever.

To answer your question: fitting more monitors into these gaps would not result in the optimal placement for that amount of monitors. 23, 24, and 25 monitors all have "expected" results. And closing the remaining gap would not result in a smaller bounding box square.

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://sprocketfox.io/xssfox/2021/12/02/xrandr/

Edit: someone already posted it somewhere is in the thread lmao

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

where can I get square monitors?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bolt cutters should work, no?

an angle grinder might be a better tool for the job

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

you could get the type that's used for large led/micro led displays: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBd7_uxrq6c

[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

16 should be rotated 37 degree to the left

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who are you to think you know better than the computer that came up with this

[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well my Machine always believes Displays have to be overlapping

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Make sure to implement the arbitrary angles in your Wayland compositor.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

arbitrary angles

You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot even conceive of how angles not based on 90° increments would render various things without issues. Or why you'd want that.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

X11 already supports this lol

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

X11 supporting it likely doesn't mean that all software would support it flawlessly. What about Wayland?

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean I don't see any reason why a Wayland compositor couldn't support it, it's pretty cursed either way though.

There's a screenshot in one of the other comments in this thread (from owenfromcanda, I think the other screenshots are fake)

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Also the table layout at my local Chinese restaurant