Cumulative since epoch of course.
ulterno
joined 1 year ago
Us of course. With the small 's'.
would have to dig deep into the stew because the puppy was at the bottom
I am having a hard time getting that.
If puppy is more tender, it would be because its tissue is lighter and composed more of fat and areolar tissue than muscle and dense connective tissue. Then in a stew full of meat from multiple ages of dog and what not, the puppy should be more buoyant than the dog, making it float higher.
How then, does the puppy end up at the bottom?
Also, to the right of those:
- roots
- stems
- branches and twigs
- leaves
- flowers
- beans
- seeds
- fruits ...
I was thinking that the faces looked more uncanny than pretty.
But considering how many different art styles I have seen, I'll probably get used to this too.
Happened with 2 of my ISPs.
I always started by telling them that I am calling using my registered number. They still asked me my registered number and then commented by telling me that I had called using that number.
Note: there does appear to be a “find a team” community, but there’s only four posts, and it looks like it died a year or so ago…
Maybe if people looking for a team, actually post in [INAT] inat@programming.dev , it won't be dead any-more.
Cue -> you
I have subscribed to it and similar communities and check them every month or so.
So I saw a post where the body text said, "Title".
The beaks, yes.
You can mill them into a powder and use it as an additive.
erhmm... chicken remains. That's what they said.
Yeah. Adoption means nothing as one is making hydrogen with the mindset they make petroleum based fuel.
Production needs to come before adoption. And by that, I mean, the end goal production process.
Any adoption before that is just wasting more energy.
But that's the same for batteries, from what I see.
What is the rationale behind GPU heatsink fin design?
So I have seen a few GPU heatsinks and I wonder why some of them are how they are.
GPU placement in Cabinet
The originally intended and most widely used placement for ATX cases at least, is installing right on the PCIe slot, which goes horizontally and with the air incoming from the front of the case.
Then we have the "vertical" placement using the riser cable, which changes the direction from which the GPU fans take in air, but keep the GPU front, in the same direction, again lining up with the incoming air from the front.
Finally the very rare vertical placement, which has the front of the GPU rotated towards the top of the case, making it not line up with an airflow incoming from the front.
This also makes the GPU's ports inaccessible the standard way, giving a reason to the rarity.
Some examples I found for this
Here we see that the first 2 placements would make up most of the ATX PC builds with the third one being either for different case styles or for extensively customised builds.
Fins, fans and airflow
I would assume that having the air flow along the fins would be better than it crossing the fins at ⦜90°. And even if the air flow due to the case inlet is being ⟂ to the airflow from the GPU fans (in case of front incoming air flowing along the fins), it should still lead to overall increase in air pressure (hence, air density) between the fins.^[Source: Mental simulation] Considering that GPUs tend to have gaps in the IO shield to let the air go out the back, I would assume they (designers of the thermal dissipation solution) want air from the fins to go out the back, which would be better with fins parallel to front incoming air.
Inference and Doubt
From the above 2, it would make sense for most GPUs to have their heatsink fins going along their length instead of their width, right?
Then what's up with the ASRock lineup, with all cards other than the Passive model, the Creator cards (which have the front covered by the shroud anyway, so no incoming airflow) and the watercooled cards (which is not applicable) having the fins ⟂ to front air inlet?
And of course they are not the only one doing it that way.
Follow Up
While discussing in this thread, I realised another point (which I didn't state anywhere in the comments):
- While it is desirable to have higher air density, it is not desirable to have air increasing in density while in the inter-fin space. Because that would cause the heat released when changing density to be transferred to the fins.
- Another way to say that is, the air will get hotter, while increasing its density. So, how much this factor matters, will depend upon the initial temperature difference between the air and the fins and how long the dense air stays in the inter-fin space. Oh and also the composition of air.
Description, because "alt text" can't show it well:
{
emit differentFiles (ckFile.absoluteFilePath(),
otherFile.absoluteFilePath(),
FileCompareWorker::FileComparisonParams{FileComparisonParams::FileNameMatch,
(ckFile.size() > otherFile.size()) ? FileComparisonParams::File1IsLarger
: FileComparisonParams::File2IsLarger});
}
After Alignment
{
emit differentFiles (ckFile.absoluteFilePath(),
otherFile.absoluteFilePath(),
FileCompareWorker::FileComparisonParams{FileComparisonParams::FileNameMatch,
(ckFile.size() > otherFile.size()) ? FileComparisonParams::File1IsLarger
: FileComparisonParams::File2IsLarger});
}
view more: next ›
If I were to be hit with "we do not consider multiple user cases" in a Linux context, by someone on the other side calling themselves a developer, then either they were paying me to work with them or I would have stopped any correspondence.
I coffinsec even treated the other side as a person worth talking to, they have already been way more accommodating than me.