Fuck AI

Right? I've had moose, bear, cow, caribou, octopus, squid, chicken, deer, roadkill, pig and sheep. I've been responsible for more animal deaths than a PETA animal shelter. I'd try the horse and then I'd only need reindeer to complete the punch card and I get some puma or screech owls or something ...right?

This! There are probably gonna be times where you need to drive to get someone somewhere in a hurry. Cannot speak for everywhere, but in my part of the world the police won't care if you are speeding to get someone to hospital, you'll still get a ticket, minimum, without license.

Still not sure what you are getting at. With sex and existing, those are themselves the goal, so having a machine do it for you makes no sense. With driving, getting from A to B is the goal, not the act of driving itself, which makes calling a normal cab or a robo-taxi both equally valid ways of achieving the goal if you don't want to drive.

If the class and test is the entire intended application then what's the point? I mean, at least throw personal growth in there or something. If going to the gym made you fat and unhealthy we wouldn't go around telling people to exercise.

Look, my point is that you learn about things when you use that knowledge repeatedly. It's a chicken and egg situation and you do have to start from memorization (you wouldn't expect a medical doctor to look up the names of body parts until they just naturally stick, and you WILL have to learn some vocabulary from scratch to learn a language), but by and large if something is written down and you have access to it that's probably enough to learn it over time.

There's a bit of a sense that study has to be pain and work because... well, old people like to see young people suffer like they used to suffer, whatever. But man, I can tell you I learned far more from the teachers and professors that gave us something to do and the tools to do it than from the ones that showed up with a power point deck and asked us to memorize bullet points.

As for what AI is useful for... I mean, yeah, it's not a lot. That was my point. AI is decent at reminding you of things you sorta vaguely know but can't recall, does ok at summarization and at some coding tasks. Some of that is useful in school (I certainly would have spun up a OCR system instead of giving myself carpal tunnel cleaning up notes), but it's not much use for you if your job is to go to a lecture and... you know, learn from it.

I will say that they are not terrible teaching aids, though. Stuff like explaining language stuff, or answering specific, precise questions that you can otherwise verify are not terrible uses. And, as a very much amateur coder, AI haters may have to accept that I've actually gotten better at coding by myself via using a chatbot to fix my problems (if only because the chatbot sucks at doing the thing from scratch, so I still do the parts I can do). You can use reference and technology to learn stuff on your own, it doesn't matter if it's a chatbot or Wikipedia. It won't do you much good to try to have it replace you at doing the work if the point of the work is to teach you how to do it, though.

Look, I gave a single example out of brevity. I did ten semesters of college, every essay I've turned in was graded on formatting, punctuation, grammar, spelling and not factual accuracy, validity of research or strength of conclusions. Because doing that stuff is hard.

Multiple choice or short answer tests are easy to cram for and easy to grade. Basing curricula around them encourages cram-and-dump study methods that don't encourage actual long-term learning. You end up with students who can do high level calculus or discuss the lasting ramifications of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo for a week or two. If AI makes it impossible to pretend we're teaching students this way anymore, so much the better.