You see how easy is to chose what parts you want you follow literally and which ones you don't?
Now let them have a less toxic religion.
Railcar8095
joined 2 years ago
To be honest, it was a very paralell process. I could do a fraction of the compute, needing a fraction of the RAM, but taking a shit ton more time.
Also, theres no perfect machine for this use. I can have 3.5 times more RAM than needed, or start swapping and waste time.
Never personally meet one that did. I'm sure there are, but the only time somebody rejected evolution on the grounds of religion was a Muslim, and a zealot.
I'm not judging all Muslims because of him, neither all Christians because the worse of them.
Only for those who take literal meaning and instruction from the Bible. Honestly, nobody who follows any holy book to the letter is fit to live in a society. They can't change their believes and they don't have you change themselves. More power to them really
Tell your friend to open source the algorithm.. Somebody will surely point at a easy optimization. 100 others will just shit on your friend
*looking at the 14TB cluster I had running for 18 hours
Yep, nobody would ever need that much memory
Nah, pump the humidity. Free sauna!
There are rednecks with guns hoping for an excuse. So it's just plain evil.
I think we aren't yet used to machines fucking us over in unexpected ways for that sweet sweet spying/ad revenue.
Like, who would have asked 10 years ago "will my TV show extra ads?". Now it's hard to get one that doesn't have them. And dishwashers are next
The "first world" was defined as US and their allies, 2nd world as USSR and their allies and 3rd world as no aligned. Now, US is run by Russian assets trying to replicate the third Reich. So I guess it should be second world instead?
That sounds like a very cool feature. Have you tried suggesting to other launchers?
view more: next ›
Another great example of how to rationalize "this part in taking literally and this ones I don't". You can also say there was a lot of editorializing, that a lot came from secondary sources...
The Wikipedia analog doesn't hold any water. For staters, the Wikipedia doesn't say the mad hatter existed. If the Wikipedia started editorializing history extremely in favor or against trump, that would indeed make me question the validity of articles regarding trump.