this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
874 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
4937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Starting in early March, the platform will place every account into a default "teen-appropriate" experience unless it has proof that users are adults.

The move has brought widespread criticism from Discord users, who are citing privacy and security concerns following a recent breach of a third-party vendor that ended up exposing around 70,000 government ID images used to verify the age of Discord users.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is the part, young-but-becoming-wise friends, where the company doesn't give a shit about you and starts to prey on children, who, for a while, become very lucrative.

The chances of discord pushing ahead anyway, even with this very public outcry, is still 50/50.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I figure losing half their users while making money on their new surveillance scheme might be more profitable. Than have 100% of their user continue to use the app as is.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

And after they lose 5% of their addicted users, all they have to do is continue to grow 5%. Oh no!

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Sadly I think the end result of this won't be people leaving discord, but people giving up liberties because it's easier than fighting it

And they're banking on that, it's part of why they intentionally gave zero warning...1 month is nothing.

With more time a dedicated set of people could pull the alternatives up into solid real options

Or kick up such a huge ruckus that discord back down and undo it.

This was a very intentional and malicious choice to go "oh, yeah we're doing this next month, kthnxbye"

[–] jpablo68@infosec.pub 2 points 12 hours ago

I agree, convenience wins in this case, this is why twitter is still "bulletproof".

[–] canthangmightstain@lemmy.today 7 points 18 hours ago

Anyone with sense saw this coming when they did the same thing in Australia and the UK but I otherwise agree with your point. I think this is a very calculated move.

When the deadline gets here in a month, 80% of the group that would’ve migrated out of disgust won’t be affected because they just use Discord for group voice chats anyway, and the competition isn’t ready. The rest have been trained to put their personal info out there to anyone who asks for it. And, when (not if) they eventually roll out “IDs for Everyone”, the outrage won’t be nearly as detrimental to their bottom line because it’s already happened before.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago

Im currently at the point where I have such a presence on Matrix that I could genuinely delete my discord account

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

The obvious solution here is for DEVICE manufacturers to add verification steps in the OS for parents to configure.

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 5 points 12 hours ago

How about hell fucking no you idiot

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Obvious

How is this not worse?

Rather than a hypothetical advertising ID assigned at the browser. We now have a physical government ID tied to every single device Serial ID accessible by anyone who claims they need age verification (read: everyone).

[–] Xylian@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

What he wants are just OS level parental controls. If enabled the OS tells apps that the user is underage. Like the only info is:

underage: true/false

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yea. Basically this.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Don't we already have this?

Google Family Link, Apple Screen Time

I have personally set it up. Works great for Google and Apple. The Amazon equivalent is shite - literally had to generate e-waste to get better control.

[–] Justifier@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hey I have a better idea

How about they fuck off and talk to internet router hardware companies to make decent software UIs, with defaults that make sheep masses actually use them to 'protect the children' client side where it actually works

Oh because its not actually about that and the powers that be don't actually give a rats about protecting children and this whole protect the children conversation is a red herring to allow them to push their real goals which include but are not limited to mass censorship of people who disagree with and resist their opinions, actions, and agendas

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

The real trick is we need the governments to back down and just make sure we have the power to allow/deny our kids access.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean uploading your government ID or having to share your biometric data via video is also just as terrible. There is no guarantee that these companies will not fuck it up sell your data get hacked etc. Instead of an ID number linked to you and they now have a copy of your identity.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

Right and attaching it to your phone just means you click. "Send Daved Video" instead of "Record".

They are still going to have it for their own records

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Ok, honestly with some caveats, this might have legs.

What most of us want: to use our services anonymously and privately

What some of us want: to keep youtube/discord/roblox from enabling pedofarms. yes i get the obligatory people should just raise their kids

What companies say they want: to keep kids safe

What companies really want: to appease some users and farm as much data about someone as they can and to comply with the growing trend of places that require age verification.

So, what if they provide an offline model for age verification? download the model, phone in airplane mode. verify yourself, get a digitally signed certificate, expunge the app so shove that verifiable signature as proof that you're an adult.

From the corporate standpoint, It's no different than signing into their account and giving them your face. we keep our privacy, they can fuck off about it.

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How would that work on PCs?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] Cantaloupe877@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

I could just be me being a doomer, but I doubt any significant exodus will happen. People really about to drop discord? Right…

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

There's no way in hell I'd upload my ID. Especially since discord recently had a data breach.

Though, threatening to delete (and maybe actually doing so) might make them reconsider.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah I think these articles are trying to push people to leave discord and not actually reporting a real trend. Even on lemmy where people are far more likely to be halfway out the door or wanting to leave discord its still a low amount saying they left.

Across the 20 servers im in i've seen 0 movement. People arent even talking about it.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago

I mentioned dropping discord in my gaming group chat. Five non political normies and myself. Literally nobody is fighting to stay on discord. We'll try a few alternatives and even if I've gotta fork over a few bucks a month, I will. Any site that requires id is dead to me.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago

I'm with you.

Considering that age verification will only be mandatory to browse NSFW content, and that without it you can still join servers and keep calling during gameplay as per usual, my bet is that exodus won't happen. There is going to be part of people who will verify, and the unverified half either gonna leave or keep using discord just without NSFW.

Reddit exodus, unfortunately, barely had any impact. Bluesky had a good influx of new users, but it didnt kill xitter. Doubt that there anything going to happen with discord.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 15 hours ago

That's like when people say that this time we won't pre-order games anymore, and the new call of duty is the steam bestseller a month before release.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Maybe people will finally realize discord isn't the place for your projects documentation to exist

[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I miss the days of forums and hate having tobfo to discord for support on stuff

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Wait, what are people using it for? I use discord for shooting the shit with people about video games and politics.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

anything communication wise its versatile.

[–] Cryxtalix@programming.dev 7 points 22 hours ago

That's fine. Unfortunately people are using it to coordinate open source software development. I don't know how people do it. You have to use the search box and scroll through hundreds of chat messages to find some code you need. It doesn't show up on google. It's just horrible.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 21 hours ago

Pretty much anything 3d printing-related has a discord. Want to build a specific type of printer? Latest info is always on the discord, and if you don't check it you'll find yourself with pieces that don't fit together.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago

Do it, pussies. I remember when sites would actually topple when they made poor decisions.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Threaten? Bro as soon as the 2 people I care about get on Root I'm out.

[–] sandbag@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Root? What's that from what I've heard a lot of people are moving to stoat.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Intro to Root that I watched

Root app's website

I made a Root account and run it on NixOS through their appimage. I'm waiting on my friend to get it so I can test the voicechat and screen share but so far it's functional and has 2 awesome features that Discord doesn't have. Reply to more than 1 comment with only 1 of your messages. Tabs on the top similar to a browser, it's just more natural for me than the sidebar shit.

In the mean time I'm still probably gonna host a Matrix server with a VPS incase Root ever decides to pull a Discord.

Plus I just don't like the name "Stoat." xD "Get on Stoat bro" Sounds weird.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Real question, what stops Root from having the same problems as Discord?

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

For now they're really incentivized to not be douchebags to grow their company, at least for the a year or two imo. Which is plenty of time for people like us to figure out how to host our own shit so we don't have to decide whether we want convenience or privacy/security.

But I'm still hopeful for Root just like I'm hopeful for a company like Steam continues to stay decent.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 15 hours ago

Plus I just don't like the name "Stoat." xD "Get on Stoat bro" Sounds weird.

This is actually the main reason I believe most of these discord alternatives have zero chance at becoming mainstream. Name is 75% of the success. Just think about it.

[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I am just not going to participate in that verification shit, and, for now, I will just not see that stuff anymore.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do adults have to suffer because parents don’t know how to control their kids?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because it's not actually about the kids, the kids are just the excuse. That's all they ever are.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 231 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Discord age restrictions prevent an underage user from viewing - but not sending - nude pictures.

This isn't to protect kids. It's to enforce increasingly authoritarian control over the web.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›