NotMyOldRedditName

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

These swings are good opportunities to harvest losses if they cause any and you can move into something else that's similar.

Like from a Blackrock 80/20 fund to a fidelity 80/20 fund or whatever it would be.

Minimal risk but you can still realize a loss.

I was going to do that until he of course undid it today. My timing was off unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump should just create a tarrif that doubles whatever increase the target nation does.

So tarrifs China 50%. China hits back 50% so now China is 150%

Then China should do the same and raise tarrifs.

Then we'll have infinity tarrifs!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Pretty sure you only need a tinfoil hat here if you think water isn't wet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Also worth pointing out, from my understanding, Russias artillery is more fire a shit ton and cover a lot of space because it's less guided/targeted (and i dont mean gps guided, but triangulation kinda thing), while ukraine is using better tech to coordinate strikes.

So that either means Russia fires the same amount in any given barrage but can't do as many, or they fire less in each barrage which makes their less targeted barrages less effective. Either way that's an extra boost.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Wow that's very substantial. Well done. Now do another 50%!!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Did he wuss out, or did his billionaire donors get a call yesterday saying he was going to do this at 1pm eastern or whatever it was?

Edit: maybe it's in a signal chat and we can get a journalist added lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

I don't think these are ever ultimately difficult to cross if undefended. The point is to stop them long enough to push them back so they can't undo it.

The point is its over an extended length so they can't just immediate cross somewhere, you get time to stop them.

I bet now that Russia failed to defend this spot, they'll have to try and close it, which will divert resources and let Ukraine try and open another spot as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Posted as comment not reply to someone by mistake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Trump 2026/2028: the US is under economic war from the entire world and this is a national emergency, we cannot have an election until they resume all normal trading with us and honor our tarrifs up the ass without any counter tarrifs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Illegal immigrants also go to the hospital or see doctors, when we do we release those records to help track them.

And clearly every good upstanding American citizen has health insurance, and only the dirty immigrants don't, so we should just deport everyone that doesn't have insurance to El Salvador because all their other documents must be fake if they don't have insurance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Can't have a parade if doge fires the entire military!!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

At this point the only way it'd be possible is if one party controlled both chambers of congress. The current MAGA bunch would impeach and convict the next dem president for putting ketchup on their hotdog before mustard.

Also Fox News was a direct response to Nixon so it would never happen again to a GOP president. They won.

-10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I hope everyone can now stop with all the it has no crumple zone so it's a death trap comments.

I guess that means doubling down on the pedestrian death machine now.

Full report is available from the website

Edit: Also the report is dated January 14th. This is before Trump.

 

So, the recall is more than the rear camera, there was a software/hardware combo problem that could cause the HW4 computer to short, which took out major functionality on the car without the computer.

The backup camera is part of what is lost, and is a mandatory safety feature, so the recall is technically because of that, even though it's much more than that.

What I find interesting is that this appears to be the 2nd recall where software has physically broken hardware which is a more uncommon type of recall. Lots of hardware problems that can be fixed with software, but not a lot of software problems breaking hardware.

The other one was on earlier Model 3's they were logging too much data, and they actually went through the lifespan of the memory in the vehicle. Once the memory was dead the vehicle had problems. The fix was to log less. They eventually had to address that, but it took a long time to properly acknowledge.

Tesla said a reverse current may occur while powering up the vehicle, which could cause a short circuit on the car's computer board and result in the rear-view camera becoming inoperative, the automaker said.

The automaker said the issue was the result of a sequence of specific software and hardware configurations, coupled with colder temperatures.

Tesla said it has already pushed a software update to vehicles that changes the vehicle power up sequence to prevent the shorting failure. Tesla will identify any vehicles with a circuit board issue and replace the car's computer if necessary.

The automaker launched an investigation after seeing an increase in car computer replacements relating to short circuit issues in November.

Tesla said it has 887 warranty claims and 68 field reports related to the recall but said it is not aware of any collisions, injuries or fatalities related to the condition

Tesla said Model 3, Model S and Model X vehicles in production also received a different car computer variant after Dec. 16 to address the issue.

The issue affects 2024-25 Model 3 and Model S vehicles and 2023-25 Model X and Model Y.

 

Having a discussion about turning radius of the EV trucks, and a person takes a radius for 2 vehicles, and then compares it to the turning circle of the 3rd.

I try to politely point out that the numbers he's comparing aren't the same, and then he replies that he "stands by the numbers I found"

https://lemmy.world/comment/14256612

 

The company’s letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) stated the door handles could allow water to enter the circuit board assembly, which may lead to the doors opening unexpectedly.

According to Volkswagen, the production halt could last until the beginning of next year as it works to resolve the issue.

 

So both Rivian and Tesla have or say they are going to have range extenders for their trucks, but in both cases even if they are removable and rentable they are huge as trucks are huge. In teslas case it seems to be a permanent change though.

What about commuter cars though?

One thing we really need is cheaper in city commuters and those don't need a long range. That brings costs down and gets more people into EVs, but those will get relegated to 2nd cars in many cases.

If those commuter cars could go to a shop and get an extender added in the trunk though that would make them much more capable of longer trips as well while keeping costs down.

If the battery rental is similar or less to renting a car for the same period then people would opt to use their own car for the longer trip and all the personal comforts that provides.

The batteries would be much smaller as well for a smaller vehicle.

view more: next ›