this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
1420 points (99.7% liked)

memes

18903 readers
1946 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 147 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's so dumb. Just let people rate it with the five stars. They're so gun-ho with the algorithm let it do its job.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 128 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They don't want you knowing what other people think of the video. It's just about what you think of the video. Much easier to have an algorithmically perfect echo chamber if everyone is privately rating things and has no idea what others think about them.

[–] relic__@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

It's all bots anyway

The thumbs up/thumbs down thing was fine too.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that 99% of the time 1 and 5 stars options were used, so like/dislike is enough. There isn't much point in including a "I have no strong feelings one way or another" button.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 89 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The final stage is not caring at all what you think user. Only consume.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Great movie btw. But this just gave me the perfect idea for an ad blocker, that would replace all the ads with these type of signs.

Someone smarter than, get on it!

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Adblock/comments/70xaqa/a_they_live_adblocker_details_in_comments/

This uses Catblock with a custom image set, but Catblock hasn't been updated in 6 years, so I don't know how well it still works. Anyway, if Catblock won't work, we have to find a blocker that allows for some customization and then fit those "They Live" images in.

(I'm trying to get Catblock to work, but somehow I can't find any pages that even load ads? I think the pihole is blocking the scripts that would load the ads.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

They Live (1988)

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

I'm almost sure I've actually seen that implemented somewhere

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Like reverse google glasses ?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The stars used to tell the company if you thought the video quality was good.

The stars now tell the company how to tailor a version of reality specifically to what you want to see and feel.

[–] RogerMeMore@reddthat.com 10 points 1 month ago

"Oh man, I remember those days when the stars actually meant something! Now they're just trying to push their own agenda on us."

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Amy Schumer isn’t hated by Netflix users. It’s the star system that’s wrong. “

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 55 points 1 month ago

Then you start watching mostly your subscription list and they get angry their fancy algorithm isn't working.

[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a war on negative feedback.

It's not good for business.

Now be happy.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The thing is, people themselves outside of business motives hate negativity.

People regularly get angry at others for bringing up criticisms of everything from foods to their favourite media products.

Even decades ago they'd give them names like negative Nancy, and within social settings the worst people often can win by weaponizing civility to quell legitimate backlash against immoral actions.

I mean, fuck, think about how many stories you've heard of people who have been the victims of sexual assault, who get told by normal people to shut up and whose experiences were diminished because it harshed other peoples mellow?

People suck, and one of the biggest reasons people suck, is they would prefer a harmful peaceful positivity than a tumultuous improvement causing negativity.

I think these companies are hooking into these human flaws in ways that hurt us, and benefit them with information asymmetry.

I don't think we can properly fix these flaws without somehow getting normal people to acknowledge that negativity is not just good, but vitally important.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

people themselves outside of business motives hate negativity.

I think these companies are hooking into these human flaws in ways that hurt us, and benefit them with information asymmetry.

Oh, companies know. Social media have definitive data that show most users engage on anger. That's why it's in their core interest to promote rage baits and disinformation. More engagements means more traffic. More traffic means more advertisers. More advertisers means more revenues.

Hell, even before social media, news tends to report more on negative news than positive ones. Because bad news is tantamount to hearing gossips, and we all love gossips. I know many of us will say bad news makes us sad, and yet we still tune in to any news.

People regularly get angry at others for bringing up criticisms of everything from foods to their favourite media products.

Kind of on a tangent, I notice this as well that some people seem more predisposed to negative thinking. I think it's just hardwired into them. Although, I have to say, in my field of work, negative thinkers tend to have good attention to detail. Being suspicious and mindful all the time, they will check every nooks and crannies, and examining and scanning for almost everything. It is a good trait to a limited degree, but it could impair relationships both at work and outside, if one is too suspicious and distrustful of everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

5 star rating are actually 4 star ratings with a free 20% boost.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Hate it. Gave my employer a bad review, 1-2 stars in most categories, and the average was still a 3.7?? I have to adjust my intuition when reading star reviews. Apparently 3.5 is bottom of the barrel.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The good news is: that reviews wasn’t really accurate.

The bad news is: that review wasn’t really anonymous.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

My last day is Friday. :)

I've tried my best during the last seven years to make a change, both by lobbying upper management and introducing change in my team. Nothing stuck, nobody besides my team mates cared. So I hope it's not really anonymous. I'm clinging to the illusion they'll somehow take it to heart now that it's public, for the betterment of the team mates I leave behind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Next step: you must have a camera enabed to use YouTube so we can directly monitor your facial expressions with AI✨ and save you precious rating time to recommend you better videos!

But really so we can ensure you're watching the ads.
[–] Zink@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know I am not alone here, because Lemmy and all, but holy god damn does that little AI sparkle trigger me more than any other AI term or image.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

They just hiding performance metrics because they know it affects viewing habits, right?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

All I want to say is:

I rarely like any video so much that I want to give it a solid 👍

Its also pretty rare for 👎

But I'll rate stuff on a scale of ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ every day of the week.

Also, hiding 👎 is completely brain-dead stupid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Anyone else notice that thumbs down is back, there just isn’t a counter. I’ve seen it for a few weeks now.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure it never was different tho I usually use a plugin that shows thumbs-downs. It's basically guessing for new videos so it's not really useful but still

[–] M137@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I thought it never left? They just didn't show the number of dislikes to anyone other than the channel who made the video (without plugins, revanced etc).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

My favorite is Amazon streaming that has a "rating for your taste out of 5 stars", but they don't want it to point out that most of their catalog is shit, so everything from Shawshank Redemption to Movie 43 are "4.5 stars for you"

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get the first step. You don't watch a video and have the urge to tell the world that it was neither good nor bad. I think they moved to stars because everyone just gave 1 or 5 eitherway

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Corporation does well: brags about all the statistics Corporation does poorly: hides all the statistics and asks customers to trust it that it's doing well

Classic corporate transparency. When a filthy corpo says they're dedicated to something, they're usually dedicated to the opposite.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Next step: you no longer can like or dislike the video.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

TBH, people often dislike bombed videos some pundit "disproved" it for them.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I blame Netflix for starting this shit, and I blame everyone who subscribes to them for allowing it.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I do not know why to use Netflix in the first place if you can simply visit free streaming platforms like HDREZKA, watch a few ads and then enjoy your film. Yeah, ads can be annoying sometimes but, at least, all is free, content doesn't get removed simply because of it is no longer watched actively and no forced registration. And they also provide some useful features like the personal lists, collections, different sound records, history of publication for series and even the approximate schedule for the upcoming series which is really useful.

[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The like/dislike system is better than stars IMO.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I disagree. There are a lot of videos that I find just "meh". I might not regret watching them, but wouldn't recommend them nor watch again.
Then there is content which I find pretty good/bad but not extremely good or bad. For such cases a more nuanced scale is better.

For other users this might be less informative, since they will be seeing just the average anyway and can therefore only determine general perception; except if the distribution is also made available.

But for a personalized recommendation system I think a nuanced scale can work better.

From a content creators perspective one can also evaluate better whether there is room for improvement and by "how much", in case one is interested in such.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›