this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
431 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck AI

4600 readers
1638 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 13-year-old student was expelled from a Louisiana middle school after hitting a male classmate who she said created and shared a deepfake pornographic image of her, according to her family’s lawyers.___

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Bullied kid who fights backs is the one to be punished. A tale as old as time

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

Webre added that he does not expect to criminally charge the young girl.

“Due to the totality of the circumstances, we chose not to pursue charges on the female student,” he said.

What the fuck. Why is this is a question. Why would it even be possible to criminally charge the victim. Why are you acting like you're doing her a favor by not "pursuing charges". WHAT fucking charges would you be fucking pursuing.

I don't expect commenters to know the answers to this. I just want to emphasize how American cops hate women so fucking much that when they have a 13-year-old female victim of a sex crime they ask themselves what crimes they can charge her with.

And men wonder why women don't report.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The name of the crime would be assault. Would you like a definition? ;)

100% agree she should not be charged as I believe it's 100% justified here, but to say you don't know what they would charge her with when it's pretty clear... That said, it should be understood that when someone does something that deserves a slap or a punch or a kick, while the person might be guilty of the crime, the justification means you do not pursue it. Like the father who catches the guy messing with his kid and he kills the guy. Yes it's Murder 2 but you don't charge him if there's a decent bone in your body. You help him get the body off his property so he can tend to his child.

I also agree the focus should be on the actual crime, the guy making CP of a minor. Even if he used technology to fake it. It's still portraying a child; ergo, it's CP. The focus should be on him being placed on a sex offender registry for however many years. But, it's Louisiana so who knows. The girl would have no rights, especially if she has dark skin.

ETA: First part is meant to be funny, not argumentative. Apologies if it came across that way! Agree with you, was trying to be funny.

[–] BlackAura@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Technically it's battery if she actually made physical contact. :p

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

We won't pursue charges but she will be expelled

Welcome to the US of fucking A

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

A long, long time ago, someone told me that crimes are committed separately. (I don't even remember the person who told me this.) The situation that was discussed in that conversation was that a burglar had entered a home illicitly, fallen due to some code violation, and hurt themself.

The homeowner was able to conduct a case against the invader, but the criminal was also able to sue for ... Whatever you sue for when you get hurt in someone else's house. Neither jury was allowed to know the details of the other's case, or perhaps they were instructed to disregard their knowledge.

The point is, in one possible suit the person we would likely agree is the victim is legally the victim; and in the other they are legally the perpetrator. According to the law, the two are not relevant to each other.

... Is what I was told decades ago by this person I barely remember.

In what jurisdiction does having a non-violent crime committed against you grant you license to commit a violent crime?

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

What are you crying about? They arent pursuing charges. Someone will have, or would have asked if they were. So he'd addressing it.

And morons wonder why people think they are morons...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sue the fuck out of the kid that made the deepfake. I’m sure any good law firm could deliver some emotional distress, defamation, whatever. Maybe she’d get community service at 13 if charged, but creating a wreckage of the school district and the kid that did it would send a message. Worst thing is that the taxpayer would be on the hook to pay for any compensation, not the shitty people at the district choosing to punish her.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago

I've said this before, but the kid who made the deepfake CP is getting charged for that.

[–] source_of_truth@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if she shot him? Would that be ok too?

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well she fucking didn't did she?

A child hitting another child isn't a crime that requires an arrest, trial, and conviction. It's a discipline issue that requires teachers to call the kids' parents.

And honestly? A kid creating deepfake porn is a much more serious discipline issue, but it's still a discipline issue, because a middle school boy is still a fucking child. That kid should have been expelled and sent to therapy, but not arrested, because, again, child.

Arresting a child for anything is insane - but private prisons profit off that insanity, and conservatives love the idea of black babies growing up to be prison labor, so the school-to-prison pipeline ruins more children's lives every day.

God, some people out there would have parents call the cops whenever their kids get in a fight. I hate this century.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

“Child” is a relative term. I do not consider 13+ to be strictly a child; in fact, most children (even prior to puberty) are perfectly aware of their actions. I do agree that, in many cases, people (not just children) should not be sent to prison; it does not address any root causes (or even symptoms).

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

aaaaaaand that's a production of CP charge.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 18 points 6 days ago

It's fucking Louisiana. They'll elect the little shit Governor.

That's a conservative trait like throwing people out of windows is a Russian politician trait.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If this were my child, I would take her out for a burger and milkshake (or whatever she wanted) and buy her something nice. A toy, a game, something like that.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Cool stuff, but that doesn't fix that. She needs a new school in a different place.
She also needs financial compensations. Ideally in the 10s of thousands. Let her have that money as well, fuck it.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember folks, do not aim to get in fights, but if you must fight, make sure you finish it.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Getting bullied like that is harder to recover from than being hit by someone.

Googled, and apparently, according to authorities, at least one boy has been charged with 10 counts under Louisiana’s law for distributing AI-generated nude images. So, yes, the school wasnt just wrong here. They were utterly incompetent. Someone, more than one someone, needs to be fired.

[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

My daughter would not be in trouble for this, regardless of the school's reaction.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Be a hero. Murder your local pedophile.

It's not murder when it self defense or defense of others.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd wallop the teachers, and the parents of that little shit for good measure.

That shit is stuck on the internet now. I'll take assault charges against child porn defending pigs.

[–] Hobo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I mean rhe girl moved in with her dad in 2020 and hadn't been to school since. I imagine she kind of fell through the cracks during covid as far as school goes. All of the adults in that house belong in super jail though.

this is like that last south park episode

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I think we should lose our minds over this without knowing the full story.

If you disagree ill make a sora of you agreeing.

Full story is that it did happen. Theres a kid been charged with 10 counts of distributing faked nude images of a minor. So it happened.

https://www.wafb.com/2025/11/11/middle-school-student-charged-with-sharing-ai-created-nude-photos-classmates-sheriff-says

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 103 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the classmate got a prestigious job in tech i assume?

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's on his way to a cabinet position

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago

She needs a commendation, not an expulsion for god's sake.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 87 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I got suspended for defending myself against getting hit in the head with a chair when I was a kid. School policies are totally fucked. Guess they just wanted me to stand there and sustain massive head trauma? Assholes.

[–] wer2@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When I was in school, if someone hit you over the head with a chair and you didn't fight back, you still got suspended because you were "involved" in a fight.

Because the fight itself is an inconvenience for the school. Also, they figure you probably asked for it at some point.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I got jumped in 10th P.E. in the locker room by a bunch of guys in the class. I got in trouble for defending myself with a weapon (locker padlock) and forced to apologize to my attackers who were not punished in any way.

In 12th grade in another state, I got attacked by a bully. I happened to have on me a rusty box cutter that I almost threw away that morning because it was falling apart. For some reason, I put it in a pocket instead. When I was attacked, I remembered it and used it. I got suspended for 3 days but the bully had to get tetanus shots.

Ya many schools have taken a zero tolerance route which means you don’t really get any punishment expect for expulsion. Something like that should have been handled in a much different way.

[–] Comrade_Spood@quokk.au 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I got a friday night detention for throwing one punch at a student who was attacking me. I threw that punch after descalation did not work, and as soon as I saw a teacher I signalled for help. My dad confronted the vice principle who was the one who gave me the punishment and my dad asked him what I should have done. The VP told my dad I did as I should have and as what was expected, but that the school has a zero tolerance policy so I still needed to be punished.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Yep, if you're getting suspended no matter what you do, might as well go to town so that everyone else is to afraid to try again next time because of what happened to the last attacker.

Effectively, it's an enticement to escalate violence rather than try and diffuse the situation once violence starts.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

“They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That's the Chicago Way.”

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

How is it acceptable anywhere for someone to be expelled for hitting someone else, in a scenario like this where the cause is completely understandable and justifiable? If anything, the kid making deepfake porn should be the one expelled because that kinda thing can be legitimately life-ruining for its target. The person being expelled had every reason, right, and justification to throw hands.

I'm probably sounding like Ailurus here, but this is screwed up.

Also, isn't deepfake porn a crime in a lot of places even if it's of adults, and not of kids like in this case, which CP is already hella illegal on its own?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›