this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
187 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9653 readers
1017 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They picked that riding for a reason. The Cons got 81.8% of the vote in the recent election in that riding.

I wish we had the requirement that you must LIVE in the riding you're running for and have lived there the past 2 years at least. Should also have to live there the entire time in office as well.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hilarious that a bunch of Albertans that hate Ottawa politicians are about to vote in an Ottawa politician.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Perfectly on brand, tbh.

They love freedom, but not for trans or gays.

They love their country, but they hate paying the taxes to support it.

They love democracy, but they hate when anybody else wins.

They hate tyranny, but they love to back traitors.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Because they're not consistent. It's not about anyone being an Ottawa politician, it's just their tribalist victim complex.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd love to see Albertans reject him as an "Ottawa elite parachute candidate".

They won't, of course, but a guy can dream...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The last thing I would change is you only get paid the median wage of the people who you represent.

Truly a person of the people

It would encourage you to do a better job and try and lift your community to greater heights

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's actually a decent idea. Imagine if Trump's income was capped at $66k/year, the US median income. He might actually give a shit about income inequality and raising the minimum wage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Exactly, your MP is supposed to represent your local interest. If they don't live there why the fuck would they care about you and your interests?

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

All the people that thought Poilievre would not continue as the opposition leader need a wake up call. You still don't understand what you're fighting against. Cult of personality is a major pillar of fascism, and loyalty (to the leader, not to the country) is the most valuable trait. Poilievre had a few humiliating defeats but he's still gaining grounds for the CPC, and the conservative wave is still on it sway, bolder and with lots of resentments piled up.

Take this seriously. The enemy doesn't have to be smart or competent, they just need to amass power. https://www.antihate.ca/40ways

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What kind of calculus do you think the liberal party has done just now…. Let loser Polievre come back to show himself to be more of an obstructionist loser that he continues to be??? He’s going to block Carney’s agenda again just like they did during the last house sitting. Also Scheer is an absolute thumb head. Polievre is a coward and a hypocrite.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I didn't expect him to voluntarily step down.

I expect the party to follow it's own damn rules and have the leadership review that their party rules requires after a losing election.

Of course, they could still do that after he inevitably wins in one of the safest seats in the country.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sweet another chance to take that one from him too

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not in Alberta.

That guy resigning got 82% of the vote.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

I know you’re right, but think how funny it would be…

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Holy shit do they not want him to lose again.

"The Conservatives handily won that riding on Monday with nearly 82 per cent of the vote."

They picked one of the safest ridings in the country so that there's no chance of that happening.

I assume he's being paid off by the Conservative party somehow. Otherwise he just spent a lot of time and money to get re-elected and is now unemployed.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would be funny if it flipped anyway

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Even if it went to a hard right independent; anyone but Poilievre

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

If I just voted for someone and then they quit to allow someone else to run and I needed to go vote AGAIN just for some power play I would be fucking pissed. Hopefully these voters are as well.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Voters rejected PP.

It seems like this other Conservative isn't confident in their own ability to act as an MP. And it doesn't look good to give your seat up to a loser.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It also shows to the people in the riding that they don't matter ... the position is just to get a politician into power not to represent actual people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the position is just to get a politician into power not to represent actual people.

Based when we're talking about the Conservative party, eh? 🤭

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@Showroom7561 @ininewcrow Based regardless of the political party.

You know I find the nominal political viewpoints of conservatives(small c) just. Not exactly my cup of tea but like supporting armed gay married couples with a marihuana growing business while having a long term view towards a responasible budget is an entirely valid and respectable #policy position to have.

The brain melting Hybrid civil war they are waging on the other hand...

Not just in #Canada but across #Europe and the entire #West. Well what passes for The West now a days anyway.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

There is no such thing as a small "c" Conservative. If you vote for the party, you stand with the tent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You know I find the nominal political viewpoints of conservatives(small c) just.

Why even bother creating a steel man for conservatism? Free yourself from this enlightened centrist fantasy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Fuck off. How the fuck is this kind of bullshit allowed? He lost! He shouldn’t get to swap out with someone. Wtf

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is how the government of Canada operates. It shouldn't come as a surprise.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Absenteeism in the Catholic Church was a major factor in the Protestant Reformation. There will come a time in any system that allows it where it is violently reminded why a disconnect between representative and the population they are supposed to serve is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Did you mean shouldn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean the other guy won by like 80%. I doubt he's going to lose

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

So the unemployed loser went to daddy for a handout. I want to know how much he paid the other guy for switching places.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

On Friday, the Conservative Party announced Conservative MP-elect Damien Kurek will resign to allow Poilievre to run in an upcoming byelection.

Kurek was first elected in the Alberta riding of Battle River—Crowfoot in 2019.

The Conservatives handily won that riding on Monday with nearly 82 per cent of the vote.

Of course it's Alberta and solidly blue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Something something safe space, something something inclusion, something something participation trophy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

poilievre is now a DEI hire exactly in the way the cons lie and misrepresent DEI hires

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Dude hasn't had a real job, so having things handed to him like this is prob second nature for him.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Where's the Rhinoceros Party when you need them? There's no chance in hell that riding flips for the Liberals, and likely not for the NDP, but an independent running on a platform of "hear me out, this will be hilarious" just might stand a chance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn I thought this dude might actually be gone. This feels really unfair. He doesn't give a shit about that area, so much for local representation

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's going to be entertaining to see a liberal win that seat well

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an Alberta riding that went 82% Conservative in the last election. It's highly unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

About as unlikely as going from a projected super majority to an 8% chance of forming a Government?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A chance to take another seat from them. Heck, if he loses there, too, he might even try again!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See a lot of post just about the 81.8%(53,502) of votes, but the bigger thing is that it's out of 81,123 electors so even if every other elector went to a single candidate plus another 10k swung from Conservative's that would still not be enough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_River%E2%80%94Crowfoot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay Battle River-Crowfoot, you know what to do

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It’s exceptionally blue even for Alberta but who knows? I hope the liberal candidate calls Fanjoy for tips and starts TODAY. It’s not impossible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nauseating. Listening to Andrew Failure Scheer on Power & Politics rn and it’s abhorrent as is the entire con party of Poilievre fluffers as professional rim jobbers to fash.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The guy wasn't an MP long enough to be eligible to the pension at 65 either, he'll get what he put in back so that will be a nice cheque to keep him going for a bit (20% deduction for the MP's pension).

load more comments
view more: next ›