this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
339 points (99.7% liked)

Fuck AI

5249 readers
1228 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And you can make them more lopsided! (It was at 95% no when I checked)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 140 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Honestly, I'm surprised. Was expecting something close to 50/50 or maybe 40% yes, 60% no but this is hilarious and heartening:

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 124 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You'd probably get a closer split with the general population, but for a search engine mainly used by privacy-conscious people and those wanting to get away from Google's bullshit, it makes sense.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, it was probably an ad in disguise. You want AI? We've got it! Don't want that bullshit? That's cool, we're not gonna shove it down your throat.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

An ad that actually tells you some info after asking for info is honestly refreshing

[–] Today@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But are you willing to click yes to find out?

[–] Zorcron@piefed.zip 4 points 2 days ago

They link to the “yes ai” and “no ai” versions either way you vote, just presented differently.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's a little ironic because all the searches just go through Microslop's bullshit instead. Yes, DuckDuckGo is just Bing wearing a duck hat.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo uses multiple search engines and does not just pipe queries into bing

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They sure try to make it sound like that, but I ran a side-by-side comparison with sandboxed Bing and kept getting identical results.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Given that they've been in business for nearly 20 years, maintain their own crawler and have said multiple times they source results from a variety of sources I'd feel incredibly cheated if they were just returning bing results.

Plus I use bing at work and ddg results feel* better.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much anything feels better than "Binging it," but misleading people for a long time is nothing new.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

I dont think theyre shipping raw bing results I just tested 5 searches and the 1St page of results was different between ddg and bing. Quite significantly and its jarring how shit bing is.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Notably, it's important to do these in sessions where no tracking cookies are possible.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago

Better a proxy for Bing than Bing itself

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

I did not know that, so no better than startpage, a netherlands based privacy minded proxy for google?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

Currently same split showing, 96% against, 4% for, but with just over 5400 votes. :)