this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
490 points (99.0% liked)

News

37211 readers
2189 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 122 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The title really lacks context. The "person in Russia in the group chat" is Witkoff, the US official in charge of the situation in Ukraine and the Middle East

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (7 children)

That is definitely the context needed. Not sure though if he needed to know the exact details of the battle plans whilst in Russia. Still feels like a slight lack of control of sensitive information. Albeit it’s not as bad as forgetting you had a journalist in the same chat.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hillary was crucified over emails on her own server. What these guys are doing is way worse by using a commercial platform to transmit sensitive information.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even without going to this signal usage as a comparison. Musk's DOGE department is literally doing the exact same thing that Hillary did, but with more security holes.

Conservatives have no real principles. They happily engage in behavior they criticize - it's all just about political attacks, its never about substance.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It’s about making the rich richer

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I won’t argue against that either, the whole administration is just pure incompetence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure though if he needed to know the exact details of the battle plans whilst in Russia.

Through an unsecure platform, no less.

There really is no excuse for any of this. And they are denying that a chat existed, or that any classified information was posted, or that there were even plans to attack anyone... imbeciles. Every single one.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Unsecure, meaning not an authorized channel for this type of classified discussion to have even be taken place.

Signal is still "secure" in the sense that it uses encryption, etc.

But as with personal emails, which may also use encryption, is it NOT a secure way (i.e. not the proper method of communication) for sharing highly classified war plans.

Republicans railed on Hillary for the whole server fiasco, but this is magnitudes more damaging to the competency of the administration, and for national security.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unsecure ≠ Insecure

Unsecure in this context generally means not in compliance with military and classified security practices and procedures for "securing" information.

Signal is secure in the sense of being strong end-to-end cryptography.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 1 year ago

Or said differently: signal will probably resist attempts to hack the chat, but it won’t resist the “beat him with a wrench til he unlocks his phone” strategy. That’s why secure comms for governments are usually done in a secure room in an embassy, on hardwired devices.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's a complete lack of control of sensitive information. Signal should never be used for this. No phone app can make the security guarantees necessary for this level of detail.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I mean, if anyone needs to know, it's him, right?

[–] PointyReality@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Possibly, but by private company owned chat? Also while in a foreign country known to be hostile to the US. If you apply this logic it smacks of lack of thought towards control of sensitive information which is pretty much the incompetence this administration has shown since well a long time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

No doubt on a personal device, surrounded by hostile cell towers and WiFi hotspots and being bombarded with who knows what kind of state-level malware.

It’s not like they need to break signal; if they can clandestinely screencap, keysniff etc then this chat was completely pwned regardless of how secure it was between TCP endpoints

This is not even a conversation that should be happening on a government issued smartphone in a hostile foreign country.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

See, Donald Trump was feeding the Russians false information via a double secret Signal Chat under the guise of accidentally leakng it. He plays 18D chess.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's already well established that the Trump administration is a bunch of traitors and foreign assets.
What puzzles me is how Americans are OK with that?
They are destroying old alliances, and making them enemies to please Russia and possibly China too.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We're not quite here yet, but... it's only been 2 months.

[–] haulyard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Feels like it’s been an entire term already. 😮‍💨

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

OK so how many rioters were hurt at the January 6th attack again?

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As far as I can tell, the Trump administration is meeting near zero resistance.
If people don't do anything, it's the same as condoning it.

And yes I know there are some that do, and I know there are good Americans too.
But you are too few, and you don't make a significant difference to the problem.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

There are lots of protests going on, as well as lots of angry people going to their representatives' town hall meetings and/or calling and sending messages to them. Unfortunately it's Congress who has the Constitutional power to act and they've abdicated. The Repubs are fully on board with the trump regime and the Dems are in the minority and have very little power. Most of them are just wringing their hands as usual. There are 3 branches of government and two are fascist-ruled. The third (judiciary) has no actual power if the other two don't abide by their rulings.

It's hard to know what more the average person can (legally) do right now.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

our big problem is too many people hooked into propaganda machines like they're in the matrix. too many people on bluesky, twitter, facebook, lemmy, and at their local mcdonalds watching mass media news, all without connecting to anyone else who can help them muster resistance or help them direct their feelings.

the revolution will not be televised. people need to go outside and start talking to their neighbors to dislodge them of the notion that this is politics as usual

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes there's a lot of truth to that. But at some point people should get concerned enough to take to the streets.
But despite everything happening in USA, that is not the case.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that's what i'm saying. those of us who are pushing back against fascism are currently trying to get our coalitions bigger, and i need anyone on lemmy not outside getting on that timing. the bigger and stronger our coalition the safer it is for our activists to act

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wish you all the luck.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Jfc. Every article increasingly reveals just how inept Trump and his syncophants truly are.

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I could say I'm shocked.

Meanwhile my work computer/phone doesn't even work outside the country. Next question is if these communications were on people's personal phones as well. 😮‍💨

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one cares. No one gives a shit. There are "collateral arrests" made in relation to deportations. Libraries and national parks are being defunded.

...if you're not rioting now you ain't gonna. America is in a holding pattern of decay.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All the easier to pass the info on to his Russian handlers. Seriously the probability that at least some of their phones are compromised by Pegasus or other state-sponsored spyware is very high. As Pete Buttigieg said, "These are very rich and powerful people. They won't personally suffer the consequences. This is a game to them."

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Stevie Deals is everywhere.