this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
193 points (95.7% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4060 readers
70 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For those who don’t know already, this is called a Voronoi diagram.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think I'm too stupid to understand this. How are they straight lines and not at a diameter / in a circle from any given point? It seems... wrong.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Oh! It totally does. I guess I've just never had to apply distances in such a way that they'd butt up against one another to become what looks like basic geometry.

Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I assume part of the confusuion is that the earth is not flat. If one would create a Voronoi diagram on the surface of a globe, the resulting borders would still be straight lines, but, when projected, it depends on the projection, whether they remain straight.

The creator probably started with a Mercator projected map of Europe and then calculated the distance between any point on the map and all capitals. The distance on two points on the spere, however, cannot be obtained by counting the distance in h/v pixels on the map and applying Pythagoras, as Mercator projection exaggerates horizontal, east-west, distances. So one needs to map the pixel coordinates back onto the sphere and calculate the distances there.

It's definitely a nice map though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What does the separating line between two circles look like?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I've tried to demonstrate it here. You end up with straight lines because it's always a middle point so it doesn't curve one way or another between the two points.

If the circles had a set radius then you'd have empty space and more circley-looking spots. But since they basically expand until there's a middle point you'll have these straight lines.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was joking. But +1 for the effort and this looks like art, btw.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Oh dang didn't realize you weren't the same person. Thanks for the compliment, I had fun drawing it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Draw it, then consider where the exact middle point would be. Now do the whole line between them. I think that's the best way to figure it out.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

I, for one, support the Republic of Great Ireland and Northern Britain

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

On this map, you can see why Denmark's capital is Copenhagen. When Denmark controlled Scania and Schleswig-Holstein, it was much more centrally located than today. The borders of Denmark in this map correspond roughly to the borders before the Treaty of Roskilde.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Seconded, if Danes would take the hot potato out of their mouth and start speaking proper Swedish. :p

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The question is, do Scanians speak proper Swedish?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Depends, when actually speaking Swedish only with Scanian accent, they are ok to understand, but when switching to Scanian – impossible, but in a different way than the Danes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

You either want the danes, or you want someone else who doesnt speak danish, you cant have both

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

it's also weirdly accurate to where people might commute to copenhagen today

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think that these should not be straight lines regarding that the Earth is a sphere. Especially between Moscow and Helsinki.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it should also take into account transport feasability to at least some degree, like no one in their right mind would associate narvik with helsinki..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

For railway, there is already some neat project for visualising the reach in a certain travel time from any city with a station. https://www.chronotrains.com/de/explore

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

this i an amazingly informative rendering.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

What about Edin, bruh?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

As a finn, I approve these new borders.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Suur-Suomi !

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I’d much rather be ruled by my closest capital.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

~~North~~ Macedonia

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know how NaytaData made it, but if I were doing it, I would do something like this:

  • start with a "blank" un-coloured map of coastline and country borders
  • put all the "capital" cities on the map
  • make a temporary grid of points over the map and find the closest city for each point
  • paint the map based on those temporary grid points

I would use a computer but the same steps would work with paper & pen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

If the OP is using GIS, it can be even easier.

Your first two steps are spot on, but then step three could simply be to add a large buffer for each capital and use some and/or/nor/xor (I'd have to look up to be certain) rules to have the buffer zones not overlap, but end where touching. Apply a color scheme and you're in business.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

There's something funky going on north of valleta

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Superb way to illustrate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Scotland is part of the UK sadly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Scotland is one of the four countries comprising The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The others are England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Scotland’s capital is Edinburgh.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I fully support Scotland independence, however at this time it is a constituent country rather than a country, there is a slight distinction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Hi, Well that’s very interesting. I learnt something today. Thank you for the link.

For the record though I am against independence for Scotland.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Voronoistan Union

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what if the uk colonised europe

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Those borders don't even line up with longitude and latitude! What is this, amateur hour‽

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Vaduz? Did they just choose two cities for capital-less Switzerland?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Vaduz is the capital of Liechtenstein.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

No, that is the capital of Liechtenstein

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I somehow don't understand this fully but love it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting tall portugal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Cool map.

Though, Switzerland doesn't have a capital.