Swedneck

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 26 minutes ago

yeah but that should only appy to the perpetrator, not the victim
if you do apply it to the victim it should be the other way round, if they're poor they should get more money, not less

i don't see in what universe it would make sense to give the victim of defamation less money because they're not popular

[–] [email protected] 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

getting paid for their work, ideally
which is why people hate AI, because it means people do not get paid for their work

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

you seem to be talking about a specific kind of content, completely ignoring that AI can be made to fart out anything you want.

Like the whole point is that it just takes parts of what it's been fed and recombines it into an output, right? so it only makes sense that it should be capable of making beautiful things, because it was fed beautiful things. if you insist that everything AI models put out is ugly then you're kinda implying that all art is ugly, which obviously cannot be true.

AI art is soulless, which is a very different thing from being ugly. Most corporate things are surface-level pretty but fundamentally soulless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 33 minutes ago

eh is that really true though? in my experience our brains tend to go "wow, this looks exactly right but there's something ineffably off about it and i hate it!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 35 minutes ago

that's literally how it works though, the software is trained to remove noise from images and then you feed it pure noise and tell it there's an image behind it. If that's not hallucination idk what would be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago

that removes the reference to how it actually functions though, at that point you might as well just stop being coy and call it "AI dogshit"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

surely how popular someone is has no bearing on how much money they can get from a defamation lawsuit? The deciding factor should be how much harm they've been caused.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

i mean i'm all for shitting on people who think AI should replace humans, but surely it only hurts the message to call AI content ugly when it looks completely nondescript? At least to me it comes across as a bit dogmatic.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 17 hours ago (13 children)

i always like to call it hallucination, it's significantly closer to how it works both technically and in effect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

this is just like, 96% of organizations

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

as if most products don't list country of origin already anyways..

view more: next ›