this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
671 points (98.6% liked)

News

36118 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Tesla is struggling to sell its Cybertruck, even after applying discounts of up to $6,000. Inventories are piling up in the U.S. and Canada, with demand falling short of expectations.

The 2025 model qualifies for a $7,500 tax credit, but the 2024 model—still in stock—does not. There are also concerns that the tax credit may soon be eliminated.

Tesla's goal of producing 250,000 Cybertrucks annually seems unrealistic, and analysts suggest a cheaper single-motor version may be needed to stimulate demand.

The Cybertruck’s hype appears to be fading.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 251 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because they are ugly, bad at doing things trucks do and made by a Nazi piece of shit.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re also bad at doing things a car does.

Oh and they might kill grandma.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And break your fingers.

And accelerate uncontrollably.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And take your data.

And might catch on fire after crashing.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And lock you in while it burns.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Cars do that.

If they’re made by ketamine addicted toddlers.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

bad at doing things trucks do

I mean, it's a blingy vehicle that you wouldn't want to scratch up that you use to show off. But...

Most modern pickup trucks in the US are also not all that great at being a bare-bones, knock-around utility vehicle, which is what trucks were historically used for. The modern pickup is mostly more-or-less a luxury vehicle, not a workhorse. I'd say that it's actually not all that out of line with what's happened to trucks more-broadly.

https://smartautotips.com/the-rise-of-luxury-amenities-in-modern-pickup-trucks/

Once upon a time, pickup trucks were all about utility and practicality. They were designed for hard work on the farm or construction site, and the interior amenities were basic at best. However, in recent years there has been a shift in the pickup truck market towards luxury and comfort. Many modern pickup trucks now come with a range of high-end amenities that you would expect to find in a luxury sedan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siKi79rwnYY

The Death of the Small Affordable Pickup

I think that the lion's share of that is a broader change. The Cybertruck is just a particularly flagrant example.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When I bought my Tacoma I was horrified to learn they no longer make the "small one", and I was only bon Gen 2 of the Tacoma's. They've gotten even bigger I think

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As someone who drives one out at the ranch, yep. I wish I had my old 70s model. It's nice to have the big bed for what I need, but it's missing all of the real stripped down utility I used to have.

I miss my '73 Datsun pickup.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rmean@feddit.org 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This gif is so fun to analyze, in the show you only see the scene briefly so it seems just fine but the longer you watch it loop the more you notice the flaws that they could get away with in the format.

  • Front wheels pop in and out of existence
  • Horn on the top bounces upwards when facing away
  • The antenna is always behind the bubble dome even when it should be in front of it
  • Homer suddenly flips all the way backwards when the car is roughly facing to the right
  • The entire scene is static except for the car itself and a single blink for Herb
  • The spoiler slopes down when its on the left but up when its on the right
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What an amazing time to be a BMW driver. No longer are you short penis'd douchebags the biggest assholes on the road. Congrats you shitheads, and relish in running red lights while people are trying to turn left.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had a BMW for a long time, and i was really quite the anti BMW driver, at least if you care what redditors say. I never rewlly understood the whole car cliché thing, BUT, fuck me i hate tesla drivers. Somehow they are always on their phones. Like phone on their head, not with the fancy bordcomputer. And because they are always on their phone, they can't use turn signals. And even that aside, most tesla drivers seem to have a lot of trouble driving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Congratulations, Elon. You’ve made John DeLorean look wildly successful.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s ugly, it’s heavy, it’s completely impractical, it’s associated with a petty tyrant.

Nobody wants it.

[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It also has terrible build quality, is almost double the price they said it would be, & does zero things better than any of its competitors. Crazy to think that anyone would prefer to purchase something (or you know, literally anything) other than a cybertruck

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep. Tons of recalls and it doesn’t help people get locked in them and die thanks to fires or other causes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The right doesn't want an ev and the left doesn't want a car sold by a nazi. The cybertruck doesn't have mass market appeal as a result. Sure the technofascists love them but you shouldn't mass produce something when your target customer is Caroline Ellison of all people

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their core demographic is people who only survived childhood due to the vigilance of others. It's not really a growth market.

They're ugly and apparently the build quality is shite. Even without the inescapable nazi association I can't imagine they would have sold lots.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Driving them can cause them to catch fire.

Gathering dust could also cause them to catch fire.

I guess better to just avoid the whole situation.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I remember when he got everyone excited about them it was supposed to be this affordable thing. I think it was 25k for a base model? Now they're how much? And how poorly designed?

Good thing he got a government job, I don't think he was cut out for the private sector...

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

When they were $25k and had impervious window they seemed like a reasonable albeit silly looking electric vehicle for work. Now... Not so much.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

100k for this monstrosity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean Musk has done a wonderful job of BEING the brand and then tanking the brand. It’s a publicly traded company and his actions do not appear to be beneficial to the company. I wonder how much stock holder value gets eroded before share holders revolt.

Edit: They’re starting to complain it seems

https://lemmy.world/post/26159620

[–] philz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm I wonder why no one wants to buy a nazi car

[–] xep@fedia.io 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A swasti-car, you might say.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The cybertruck didn't have hype, it was a meme car. And Elon was always too stupid to understand that memes remain popular for a very short amount of time before attention moves on.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I would seriously consider buying one for $6,000

Not $6k OFF, just 6k total because that would make it the cheapest new vehicle available and it’s worth that shitbox status

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't get one if they paid me $6000.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Cybertruck’s hype appears to be fading.

What hype? The only things it was known for since day one was being horrendously ugly, bad design, bad build, stupidly unsafe.... Need to go on?

The thing is more flammable than a Ford Pinto which is the only impressive fact about it.

What hype?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hear Molotovs are great at cleaning dust. Help out your local dealership if you can.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theoretically the contents of these lots would be insured, so if there was a sudden unexpected fire that happened to destroy all the cars Tesla gets a cash payout, unlike if they just sit there where Tesla has to take the cashflow hit of having paid to build cars that noone will buy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

No wonder he's gonna force the government to buy a bunch of them.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it come with saluting arms instead of indicators?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Only Tesla thing I'll buy is puts.

[–] ehpolitical@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to be mean, but good. What worries me about these guys is if they can't get the money (semi) honestly, they seem to find ways of taking/stealing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good, I hope all the swasti-trucks rot at the dealerships.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Good. Fuck Elon.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I love them! It's like seeing a random clown. They just make you point, laugh, and smile.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Septic tank market hasn't slowed though.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Also rust most likely.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

~~Cybertruck~~ Deplorian sales 📉🔥

load more comments
view more: next ›