this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
671 points (98.6% liked)

News

36118 readers
3073 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Tesla is struggling to sell its Cybertruck, even after applying discounts of up to $6,000. Inventories are piling up in the U.S. and Canada, with demand falling short of expectations.

The 2025 model qualifies for a $7,500 tax credit, but the 2024 model—still in stock—does not. There are also concerns that the tax credit may soon be eliminated.

Tesla's goal of producing 250,000 Cybertrucks annually seems unrealistic, and analysts suggest a cheaper single-motor version may be needed to stimulate demand.

The Cybertruck’s hype appears to be fading.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 251 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because they are ugly, bad at doing things trucks do and made by a Nazi piece of shit.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re also bad at doing things a car does.

Oh and they might kill grandma.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And break your fingers.

And accelerate uncontrollably.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And take your data.

And might catch on fire after crashing.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And lock you in while it burns.

And break if you drive through a puddle.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But, don’t you kind of deserve to burn if you buy one of these ugly swastikars?

The data says that they're substantially more likely to catch fire than the Ford Pinto.

You know, the car infamous for catching fire when rear-ended.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Cars do that.

If they’re made by ketamine addicted toddlers.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

bad at doing things trucks do

I mean, it's a blingy vehicle that you wouldn't want to scratch up that you use to show off. But...

Most modern pickup trucks in the US are also not all that great at being a bare-bones, knock-around utility vehicle, which is what trucks were historically used for. The modern pickup is mostly more-or-less a luxury vehicle, not a workhorse. I'd say that it's actually not all that out of line with what's happened to trucks more-broadly.

https://smartautotips.com/the-rise-of-luxury-amenities-in-modern-pickup-trucks/

Once upon a time, pickup trucks were all about utility and practicality. They were designed for hard work on the farm or construction site, and the interior amenities were basic at best. However, in recent years there has been a shift in the pickup truck market towards luxury and comfort. Many modern pickup trucks now come with a range of high-end amenities that you would expect to find in a luxury sedan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siKi79rwnYY

The Death of the Small Affordable Pickup

I think that the lion's share of that is a broader change. The Cybertruck is just a particularly flagrant example.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I bought my Tacoma I was horrified to learn they no longer make the "small one", and I was only bon Gen 2 of the Tacoma's. They've gotten even bigger I think

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They could either make them bigger or better on gas. I guess making them bigger was cheaper.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tacoma's gotten big, and the new Ranger too, but Ford has the (slightly homely) Maverick and Hyundai has the Santa Cruz, which is basically an Aussie-style Ute. The Ridgeline is getting bigger too, but I think its guts are still a unibody SUV/minivan frame that should be pretty easy to live with.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd love to never need a new car. My Tacoma is 10 years old and still going strong. But I doubt ill make it another 30 or 40 years. I'm hoping if I do need another vehicle I can be in a spot for an electric. Maybe one of those tiny electric trucks

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As someone who drives one out at the ranch, yep. I wish I had my old 70s model. It's nice to have the big bed for what I need, but it's missing all of the real stripped down utility I used to have.

I miss my '73 Datsun pickup.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure as far as trucks go, it’s a much more reasonable size, but making it out of nearly plate steel and all that flat glass was fucking stupid. And the sharp corners should make the NTSA wake up and implement pedestrian safety standards.

Bring back the mini truck with 6-7 foot bed. This can at least carry lumber with the tailgate down.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ooh bad news about the NTSA

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong, but due to many reasons, most of them cultural and political, most of them CAN still do normal truck things, assuming you don't need a long-bed, don't mind your very expensive toy losing its value as it gets beat up, and can fix or tolerate various frills failing over time. I am starting to see well-worn work trucks that were almost certainly bought used but would have been considered luxurious when new. There's at least a modicum of utility there that the chassis and motor can still have a second life as a truck after a few years as a grocery-hauler. There's also still one dealer near me that stocks row upon row of white Silverados with steel wheels and vinyl interiors.

The Cybertruck is very bad at truck things regardless of how you feel about its resale value, and at this point it's just a way for assholes with too much money to make their entire car a MAGA bumper sticker.