this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
302 points (95.5% liked)

News

28477 readers
4848 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Connolly secured his position on the pivotal Oversight Committee after leaders in the House Democratic caucus—most notably former Speaker Nancy Pelosi—backed Connolly’s bid over Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.

While other Democratic leaders have been fumbling for a response to Trump, the administration has been in a public feud with Ocasio-Cortez. Tom Homan, Trump’s handpicked immigration czar, has even called on the Department of Justice to investigate the congresswoman after she advised migrant communities of their constitutional rights.

In contrast to Connolly’s pro-compliance message, Ocasio-Cortez recently wrote, “America is not for sale. We have an obligation to resist kings. We outnumber them. And they can be overwhelmed.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 month ago (10 children)

If nothing else, this whole situation is a very revealing about which Democrat politicians have proverbial balls, which ones have their balls in the clamp (probably for doing embarrassing stuff), and which ones have no proverbial balls at all.

So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (8 children)

So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

"We're calling it the 'Organize Everywhere' tour," Martin told ABC13. "It's a simple premise that if we're going to win throughout this country and get back into power, we have to organize everywhere. We're visiting red states, purple states, and blue states on this tour. And Texas really is the future of the Democratic Party. This is such a critical battleground state as we move forward in the 2026 elections -- of course, the 28 election cycle and beyond."

And

"We have to earn their trust back, and part of that is not just showing up a few months before the election and asking them for their vote," Martin said. "We have to get back to organizing year-round where we're building trust with communities around shared values."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/abc13-has-1-on-1-with-new-democratic-national-committee-chair-ken-martin/ar-AA1zI1f4

Like, he's had the chair a month, and he's going out and doing local station news interviews already.

For the past 30 years every other chair would have been grifting huge dollar donors in exchange for more conservative policy positions right now.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

Like, he’s had the chair a month, and he’s going out and doing local station news interviews already.

I really feel like they all need to be doing this, as much as possible. Get out there and publicize just how fucked things are, and what they're doing to fight back, and how Trump's cronies control the entire government right now and what's happening is directly their fault.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not trying to be an asshole but if you expect anything will materially change you shouldn't be surprised when the DNC rug pulls you again.

I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

I strongly disagree.

“There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money. But we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires” - New DNC Head Martin

The DNC is run by corporate democrats which, aside from the hate, racism and bigotry, might well be the on the same team as Republicans when it comes to facilitating the actions of the wealthy in this country. Its why nothing materially changes when Dems run the show. Their wealthy donors are happy with the job they are doing currently, which doesn't include improving the quality of life for the vast majority of us because it is easier to exploit a populous that is teetering on the edge of ruin. How many of you cant change jobs because you'd lose your insurance? How few Americans have 500 dollars in the bank for a catastrophic emergency? The fact that we have to live in such a precarious position is a feature to the wealthy that allows them to exploit us for their significant personal gains. They don't see us as people, they see us as a resource to exploit and toss when they are done.

Did Biden push for Universal healthcare, or even talk about it really? What about pressing for codifying of Roe v. Wade? Or wage theft being, from a dollar perspective, the vast majority of theft that occurs in this country? Marijuana reform? Better to leave that as a carrot to try to get votes as they've shown in the last 3 elections... What about taxing the rich as a rebuttal to the constant assault on social services that help the most vulnerable in our society yet account for the smallest fraction of the actual budget? Or upholding the law and holding Trump and his cronies for the January 6th attack on our nation, which should have prevented Trump from running in the first place? The wealthy in this country are seeing their wealth explode from a government that today has enabled them to wholesale embrace corruption by attacking regulatory and oversight bodies... wonder why they didnt want Trump to be held accountable...

Biden did things in his term to help Americans to an extent, but these Donkeys in the room are glaring examples of areas that Biden had flat out ignored or intentionally neglected us. The reason to me is that the money didn't support those initiatives.... i.e. not in the donors interests.

Remember that the DNC put Biden there, and if we let them they will happily keep playing the role of controlled opposition as a fulcrum to leverage our nation to the right while giving lip service to the things we care about and enriching themselves with our donations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why are so many people stuck on a single comment he made during the DNC chair campaign when he was asked if he'd take donations from billionaires?

Do you legitimately think he'd have won the chair election by answering no?

And why did so many people all discover this comment from over a month ago about 48 hours ago?

I'm legitimately asking because I followed the chair election pretty damn closely, and even at the time it was made it just wasn't a big deal....

But most importantly:

I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

I didn't say he should be, I said I want to include him.

He has a long and respectable history at the state level, and I have no reason not to be optimistic that he'll stay that way...

Yet.

So I want him to keep doing the right thing and earn on a spot on that list.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why the absolute about-face from you on the DNC over the last couple weeks?

Why are so many people stuck on a single comment he made during the DNC chair campaign when he was asked if he'd take donations from billionaires?

They're not stuck on this single comment. They're seeing the trend from the DNC over the last few decades and seeing more of the same in his statement.

Do you legitimately think he'd have won the chair election by answering no?

And what does that tell you about where their allegiance lies? I can't believe you think this comment helps your argument.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Obligatory reminder that Sanders is categorically excluded from being a "Democrat with proverbial balls" not because he doesn't have balls, but because he isn't a Democrat. I deny the Democratic Party credit for his courage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

He does still caucus with them though. For now at least.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

It's not about balls, it's about loyalty. AOC and the like have loyalty to the country while corporate Dems have loyalty to corporate interests.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

The problem I have with this take is that we knew 4 years ago too. For some of them, we've known for decades. We should have already been primarying them out, but between local ratfuckery and a lack of funding for primary challengers, we're stuck with these assholes at a critical moment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

After the Bernie Sanders' "stop arms sale to Israel vote", I can confidently say %90 of democrats are just worthless human shits who would have fared just as well being members of the Republic party or United Russia (Putin's party) or AKP (Erdoğan's party). As long as they got a seat of some power to glue their sweaty asses to, they will adapt to anything.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Along with Pelosi. In the name of American unity, I'm ok with this shit and Pelosi being on the hanging block with the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Fetterman 2.0

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering what Trump and L1 are doing, Democrats should put every rock they find into their path. Instead they do this. Cowardice.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Considering what Trump and L1 are doing, Democrats should put every rock they find into their path. Instead they do this. ~~Cowardice~~ Cumplicity.

FTFY!

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago

Connolly is an accomplice in the coup d'etat.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Everyone downvoted me and called me an idiot when I said the Dems are weak and useless. Most of them don't have a spine.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

People lost their minds when I suggested the dems are at fault for losing so badly, not protest voters. It's funny as hell thinking the old guard of the democratic party will ever become effective

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both of them are at fault. The voters are just as culpable for being so misinformed about what was at stake, and the democrats should've told them more.

But the info was all available, so that's not an excuse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This has been explained so, so, so-so, so so so.many times. How is it still not understood?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Truly an unsaveable party.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Let it burn but we need a replacement fast

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just to state the obvious, you should be bitching at your representatives, state and federal, all the time.

Yes, that includes me too. And no, I don't do it either.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have heard from others this website can be really helpful for getting yourself going on this - https://5calls.org/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

in a CNN appearance on Sunday, Connolly said workers should comply for now.

“I guess if you can, cover yourself and do the five things you did last week just to be able to say, ‘well I did it,’” he advised.

Obviously Congressional Democrats need to fight, but this sure sounds to me like he’s just telling Federal employees to cover their bases in case the courts rule DOGE does have authority. This is their livelihood, after all.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

It's also much different than what the headline suggests.

Still bad though. They should already have a plan. They're not nearly quick enough as a body to handle what's going on.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

Wow, the cancer must have spread to his brain.

Lets hope it finishes him off soon, fuck this fascist colloborating sack of shit.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly, the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said government workers should comply with an Elon Musk order that is being disputed by others. Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency sent out an email...

Thank you Nancy Pelosi!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's seventy-four with a cancer diagnosis so... 🤞

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Tell the Gambler, the Rambler, the Backslider,

Sooner or later God'll cut you down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Why should he give a shit. He literally has terminal cancer. This who the DNC picked over a young a vibrant AOC. The DNC needs to be burned down and replaced from the top.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Too democrat recommends fascism

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

The Dems are so good at being the opposition party that they are… complying with the fascists? This is pathetic.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

Who needs Republicans when you've got Democrats like these

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If we are going to lose anyways it’s time to make a third party. Call it the Progressive Party and continue to lose until democrats give up. These people literally only care about lining their pockets.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah that seems to be a popular idea but it never gets anywhere after that.

My thought was, since the DNC organization exists and anyone can participate, we should y'know - take it over. Basically. Like it was intended.

So in the first example we'd have to build it from scratch (pros/cons) and in the second example, we'd have to deal with a fully functioning national party (pros/cons).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And now the party should primary him...too bad the party is a feckless shell of bullshit wrapped around a bunch of greedy little piggies.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The people can primary him. Need 1,000 qualified signatures first though. The party won't like it but they can't stop you from running in a primary against him and making him answer to these issues.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

now you know why Cryptkeeper Pelosi picked him over AOC for this position

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

It's nice of them to so formally declare themselves enemies of the working class.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Stupid cunt.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What makes a democrat "top"?

Like, is he the one who fucks you in the ass? That's probably it.

Edit: just to remind everyone; the DNC is a sunk cost. You can keep trying to make them fight back, make them stand up for you, and make them care. At the and of the day they will take your energy, take your money, take your vote and do nothing with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Sounds like he needs a challenger in the primaries

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

They don't want the soap on a rope.

load more comments
view more: next ›