this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
672 points (96.9% liked)

Political Memes

8526 readers
2651 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

But doing nothing wrong is the greatest right you can do, no?

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Great now we get to argue what nothing and something is…

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can we stop attacking each other? They are working the "divide and conquer" from every angle, can we not create yet another division within a group of people that agree with each other?

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 29 minutes ago

Democrats and liberals are doing the dividing themselves every time they attack people further left of them for daring to actually have principles.

So no, you can’t stop.

[–] crazyhotpasta@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago
[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 9 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I believe it's actually the opposite. So many extremists or "I don’t agree with you therefore you’re a troll" bullshit.

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

Seeing as I have not been banned for anything I have to disagree.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

It really depends on the community and the mods awake at the time.

One of my accounts got a week ban from a larger community for being "accusatory". Because I said someone sounded like they were spreading misinformation.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Depends on the things you say, where…

If you’re generally leftist, you should mostly be fine.

Otherwise you get banned for trolling (because ofc they’re right so you’re trolling) or transphobia, because if you don’t agree with everything a trans person says, you’re transphobic. Also, the world belongs to them.

Talk about lesser known subjects by the public or make a mistake yourself? Thats it, you’re banned for misinformation and trolling. Or being a nazi or racist or whatever. The words don’t have a meaning anymore

Also the random ban reasons like "Rule 3" which refers to the most open and subjective rules like "Be civil" or "Dont be a dick" or similar

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like a lot of generalizing. Probably deserved your ban to be honest.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

All I did was misgender Kris by calling them a "xir".

They were arguing over gender, and I was feeling like being contrarian...

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 0 points 4 hours ago

Oh and also the double standards

You can hope for Musk and Trump or any rich fuck to die, but do this with someone else and you’re banned

[–] XM34@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I would even go as far as to argue Lemmy is a prime example of this.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 9 hours ago

And that why federation is good, but it gets annoying having to switch instances or communities

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Just like my recent post on r/politics got censored?

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 6 hours ago

I don’t know, I’m not on reddit. And by definition if it’s removed I can’t see it.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

Well, I didn't see it

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And sometimes those people will even destroy active progress because it doesn't meet their definition of perfect.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 8 points 8 hours ago

Online leftists will destroy something because it's not 100% of what they want, disregarding the 50-60% that would be what they want.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

the other problem with leftist spaces online is a general intolerance to trolls

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Or rather the "I don't agree with you therefore you're a troll"

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The ONLY time I’ve been muted by anyone was on the Fediverse 😅 (Still can’t wrap my head around how petty the argument was…)

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 9 hours ago

And it's even worse when that person is an instance admin or community mod of a pretty big place

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago

I think you mean Collectivists in general

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 18 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think this "do nothing wrong" tendency has something to do with intragroup power dynamics. I've often seen it used as a cudgel to knock down others within a group and stop mild dissent even though everyone is on the same team. Usually the most prolific wielder of the "do nothing wrong" cudgel rises to a position of some authority in the group, after which the group fragments because the person is insufferable but unassailable due to their moral superiority.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

So...You are saying that mods are, in actual fact , not based ?

HERESY

load more comments
view more: next ›