this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
630 points (96.9% liked)

Political Memes

8513 readers
2547 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Great now we get to argue what nothing and something is…

[–] crazyhotpasta@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

I think you mean Collectivists in general

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 10 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I believe it's actually the opposite. So many extremists or "I don’t agree with you therefore you’re a troll" bullshit.

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 45 minutes ago

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

Seeing as I have not been banned for anything I have to disagree.

[–] XM34@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I would even go as far as to argue Lemmy is a prime example of this.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 4 hours ago

And that why federation is good, but it gets annoying having to switch instances or communities

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Just like my recent post on r/politics got censored?

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 1 hour ago

I don’t know, I’m not on reddit. And by definition if it’s removed I can’t see it.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago

Well, I didn't see it

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

the other problem with leftist spaces online is a general intolerance to trolls

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Or rather the "I don't agree with you therefore you're a troll"

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The ONLY time I’ve been muted by anyone was on the Fediverse 😅 (Still can’t wrap my head around how petty the argument was…)

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 3 points 4 hours ago

And it's even worse when that person is an instance admin or community mod of a pretty big place

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And sometimes those people will even destroy active progress because it doesn't meet their definition of perfect.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 5 points 3 hours ago

Online leftists will destroy something because it's not 100% of what they want, disregarding the 50-60% that would be what they want.

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org -2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

“For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted to them his property. To one he gave five talents*, to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master's money. Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here, I have made five talents more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here, I have made two talents more.’ His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’ He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here, you have what is yours.’ But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents. For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

--Matthew 25:14-30

  • A talent was a monetary unit worth about twenty years' wages for a laborer
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The point of that chapter is that you should use the talent that God has given you to improve your talent.

It's not that you should pay back your employer double his investment.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 33 minutes ago

Alternate take: Billionaires are entitled and get grumpy when they get back exactly what they gave.

Imagine if the servant had invested the talent and failed to produce a profit. How angry would the billionaire have been? The servant took no risk, and protected the billionaire’s money. And instead of being happy that their money was protected, they got angry that the servant didn’t go out of their way to make the billionaire more.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Okay this is really good but I don't see how it links with this thread, kindly explain sir

[–] Bravo@eviltoast.org 1 points 7 minutes ago

If you have opportunity to do good you have a moral obligation to seize it. Fear of getting it wrong is not an excuse to do nothing.

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world -5 points 4 hours ago

That's Right with a hard R. No thanks

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

Go away troll bait bot.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think this "do nothing wrong" tendency has something to do with intragroup power dynamics. I've often seen it used as a cudgel to knock down others within a group and stop mild dissent even though everyone is on the same team. Usually the most prolific wielder of the "do nothing wrong" cudgel rises to a position of some authority in the group, after which the group fragments because the person is insufferable but unassailable due to their moral superiority.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

So...You are saying that mods are, in actual fact , not based ?

HERESY

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

Very good take.

I complained to a partner once about something they'd done that seemed vaguely unethical (by my understanding of their ethics). After they apologised, I was still upset, and they said "maybe I'm a little bit shit, just like everyone else."

That really stuck with me. People (including myself) are often OK with accepting imperfections in other people in some spaces, but not in others. It's pretty weird.. Life is messy, even the bits that seems straightforward. And no one has a perfect understanding of any situation..

[–] manxu@piefed.social 87 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only thing more important than "do nothing wrong" is to loudly correct those who are doing "almost right" and "in the right direction."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›