chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

Nah, we ban fascists cause fascists are asshole losers who only want to be taken seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 50 minutes ago

It's an air sac

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, no shit. It was all about maximizing profits and that's it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

"I guess it's not Hawaii"

Meanwhile hawaii:

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, looks like AI shit. Thanks for sharing! Also doesn't look like this picture

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If your process is to have a plagiarism machines output crap, and then you work on top of that, that's your fucking choice. I wouldn't do it, but to each their own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Plagiarism machines make slop. Fullstop

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Human wouldn't think a patch of hair with an ear behind it was a shadow on a sun lit ear (cause the sun wouldn't be in a damn photo studio)

 

I don't care if it's in a shitposting community, a meme community, or a news community. If the image or text is generated it should be labeled as such, and failing to label it should be grounds to remove the post. AI slop is a plague and its only going to get worse as the tech matures (if it hasn't already peaked).

I'm so tired of having to call it out every time I see it, especially when people in the comments think it's a photoshop work or (heavens help us) real. Human labor has real tangible value that plagiarism machines can't even pretend to imitate and I'm sick of seeing that shit without it being labeled (so I can filter it out).

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

view more: next ›