this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1451 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

14174 readers
2465 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The ocean has killed more billionaires than the Moon has.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 140 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Lobsters have urine nozzles under their eyes, and pee in each other’s faces to communicate.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Lobsters have olfactory sensory neurons, located in the aesthetasc sensilla on their antennules, which allow them to detect the pheromones in the urine of other lobsters.

A dominant male lobster will pee to signal his dominance and deter other males from his territory. Females may also pee to signal their readiness for mating, and the urine of a dominant male can attract females.

Lobsters also communicate through touch and by using their claws, but no one really gives a fuck after reading about the pee thing.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Tl;dr lobsters have a major piss fetish

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lobster: I can’t understand what you said, please piss it slower for me.

[–] sinkingship@mander.xyz 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It won't help, the other lobster has diabetes, so it pisses with an accent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago

I've seen them on the bus I think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 90 points 5 days ago (2 children)

When a whale dies and its corpse falls to the bottom of the ocean, entire ecosystems rapidly develop around eating every part of it due to how scarce resources are in the deep ocean. This phenomenon is called a "whale fall" and it's a major source of energy for deep ocean ecosystems.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Whale whale whale, what do we have here? - deep ocean crabs

[–] Bunnylux@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Life is worth living today thanks to this comment

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Sometimes I wonder if a shipping container full of billionaires would have a similar effect.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Whales suffocate to death; they don’t drown.

Human breathing is controlled by the autonomic nervous system. We have to hold our breath on purpose to stop ourselves from automatically breathing. This makes us passive breathers. Whales, however, are active breathers. They must choose to inhale which is why they can sleep without sucking in air. When they get too old, sick, or weak to surface, they suffocate.

Bonus fact: whales can’t breathe through their mouths; it goes straight to the stomach. The blowhole is the only respiratory tract.

Bonus bonus: a blue whale’s throat is so small it could choke to death on a grapefruit.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bonus bonus: a blue whale’s throat is so small it could choke to death on a grapefruit.

I'm sure their throat can be blocked that way; but if they can't breathe through their mouth anyway, is it actually choking? Or just terminally blocked?

[–] MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair point. I didn’t even consider the ramifications of wording it like that instead of just saying it has a small throat. I tend to use analogies a lot

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Nah, it makes sense, and ice heard this phrasing before - just always wondered if they meant the poor whale couldn't breathe, or basically just had indigestion!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Baguette@lemm.ee 73 points 5 days ago (3 children)

There are lakes in the ocean called brine lakes/pools. Brine is essentially concentrated saltwater; its high salinity means it's denser than water. On rare occasions, brine doesn't mix enough with the existing saltwater around it, sinking to the bottom of the ocean and forming these lakes. The lake itself is usually devoid of life; brine itself is so salty that animals go into toxic shock if exposed for too long. However, the edges usually are full of life, where usually things like mussels and other extremophile organisms thrive.

Side note, subnautica's lost river is based off of this. No big leviathans in real life though, at least none observed yet...

Video for fun: https://youtu.be/ZwuVpNYrKPY

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Similarly, SpongeBobs Goo Lagoon is a brine pool.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It was never stated but I always assumed the "goo" referred to industrial waste. But SpongeBob creator Steve Hillenburg was an actual marine biologist and would have been well aware of brine pools, so that's probably right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Homefry@infosec.pub 10 points 4 days ago

The Blue Whale is so large, that if you laid one out on a standard NBA basketball court, the game would be postponed.

[–] tino@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Norwegian fjords are freaking deep. When you're on the shore of Sognefjord, you're standing in front of a 1300m deep canyon filled with ocean water.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 72 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are entire levels of the ocean where ecosystem is fed on the slow sinking of dying animals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Sharks are older than trees and the north star.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Greenland sharks are pretty amazing

They can grow up to 24 feet putting them at the same giant scale as great whites and basking sharks, but most are usually closer to 5 meters long

They can live for hundreds of years due to extremely slow metabolism and ambush feeding, some individuals found around 400 years old are as old as the Jamestown colony, Don Quixote, and the discovery of logarithms.

They are opportunistic feeders and have been found with polar bear and reindeer in their digestive systems, and can pull/vacuum in water to catch their primary prey of fish, eels, and other sharks.

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (2 children)

24 feet ~ 7.3m

5m ~ 16’5”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Back to the horrors of the deep...

They also commonly have eye parasites that severely impairs their vision or blinds them called Ommatokoita elongata.

So they get to live long with multiple generations of parasites stuck in their eyes they can't get out.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

So 5 meter long sharks with 24 feet? That sounds terrifying. How far up the beach can they run?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 5 days ago (8 children)

fun fact: we kill 3 TRILLION animals a year, most of which are sea animals.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (6 children)

fun fact: animals, exluding humans, kill about 1 MILLION of us humans a year, most of which are not sea animals.

[–] barf@vegantheoryclub.org 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wow that’s 0.0000003% as much, which is conveniently exactly the same ratio as my balls to your mom.

[–] o1011o@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

It's also accounted for almost 100% by mosquitos, specifically the diseases they carry...so not really the mosquitos at all. Quick searching shows snakes following mosquitos with 100,000 deaths caused per year. In any case, the scale is prodigiously unbalanced. Human animals kill trillions of non-human animals, almost entirely for their own pleasure. Non-human animals kill a few hundred thousand human animals (or a bit over a million if you count mosquito-borne disease) in self defense or by accident.

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Weird mathematical fact about that,

That works out to almost exactly every person on Earth killing exactly one animal every day.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 50 points 6 days ago (4 children)

While this is funny and all, this isn't really true for a couple of reasons:

  • We know a hell of a lot about the oceans, we've studied them for hundreds years. There has been extensive mapping of the seafloor. All of the areas close to land have been thoroughly studied. And where we've spotted interesting stuff, we've investigated for sure.
  • We haven't thoroughly explored the moon. Sure we've had nice pictures for a long time. But we've only recently seen the rear side of the moon, as we more or less always see the same side from Earth. Not till recent orbiters we've had a high resolution map of the moon, comparable to maps we have of the oceans.
  • Only a dozen or so people have ever been to the moon and the amount of research they did was very low. They also haven't brought back many samples. And the amount we can do from orbit and with rovers is very limited. At this point I would say we know more about Mars than we do about the moon, depending on how to count. The moon isn't that interesting, so we haven't done much with it. It's made of the same stuff as the Earth and without an atmosphere and biosphere, it's kinda dull.
  • This is basically impossible to measure. What is knowledge? How is it quantified? We could say it's relative. But since there isn't a way to know how much total knowledge there is available to learn, I'd say that's not possible. What does it mean to "explore"? Do people need to go there? Because a hell of a lot of people have been to the seafloor than to the moon. Hell going to the seafloor is a basic tourist activity these days. I've been to the Maldives and did some crazy dives looking at life on the bottom of the sea.
  • People might argue the Moon is basically all the same, so once you've seen one spot you've seen them all. I'd argue that's not true, we've only recently learned the moon's poles are very interesting and we know very little about that. And I'd counter that argument with the fact the same goes for the deep oceans. A whole lot of it is just barren wasteland, an under water desert. We haven't explored because there is nothing to see. We select interesting locations and study them thoroughly, instead of studying a lot of it a little bit and wasting huge amounts of time.
  • Another argument often repeated is new species are discovered every day in the ocean. Whilst this is true, we are also destroying a lot of species, so the total number might actually go down instead of up. And a lot of species are variants of already known species. Only expert biologists can differentiate between the species and know what to look for. And I'd argue they don't change the big picture or understanding at all. Still interesting, but not an indication there is so much more to find out there.
  • But what about something huge living down there? Like a Kraken or dinosaurs? Well no, we don't have to have studied every square inch to know about big life. Big life is messy, requires a lot of resources and is part of a food chain. You don't need to see the dinosaur if you can see their giant mountain of crap amidst broken trees. There might be some kind of large squid or something down there, but they will probably be extremely similar to other large squid we already know about. So a new species, but not changing the overall picture. If there were any big monsters down there, we would know about them by now.

So this is one of those things that might feel true, but in reality it really isn't.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, now that we know what's out there, I think we should focus our efforts on putting a big sea monster into the ocean.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 days ago (4 children)

We are killing the ocean by increasingly acidifying it. This has been known by scientists for decades.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ocean acidification occurs because the ocean serves as a carbon sink. Excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere forms weak carbonic acid in ocean water. The ocean has historically been slightly basic, and as it inches towards a neutral pH, it makes it impossible for things like oysters to form their shells.

One big problem is that it’s one of the biggest carbon sinks. It’s keeping that greenhouse gas out of the atmosphere. However - as you might notice if you leave a can of Coke out on a hot day - the solubility of gases in liquids decreases when it’s hotter. The world heats up because of greenhouse gasses, less greenhouse gasses can be stored in the ocean and re-enter the atmosphere, which heats the world up more…

Then we also have the lovely “ice albedo” positive feedback loop - dark ocean water absorbs more of the suns radiation, sea ice reflects more of it. Sea ice melts as earth heats up, exposing dark ocean which absorbs more heat and melts more ice….

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A teaspoon of seawater typically contains about fifty million viruses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_viruses

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Well yeah our water companies keep dumping raw sewage into them

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 5 days ago

goes to moon

Sea of Tranquility

Nooooooo!

[–] Dvixen@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not a fact but a question:

How do whales keep water out of their anuses when they are deep diving?

Whales have been known to dive almost 2 miles deep and at that depth you're looking at almost 300 atmospheres of pressure and a whale's sphincter has to be strong enough to resist that.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I had to look it up out of curiosity. The rib cage and lungs of sperm whales are adapted to collapse under pressure, squeezing all the air in the lungs into a small space and increasing internal cavity pressure.

https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/physical/ocean-depths/pressure/compare-contrast-connect-deep-divers

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I think that also happens to humans, but without being adapted to it, it's a one way squeeze.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They don't. That's their kink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Thalassaphobia is a real thing

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Global warming has a slower effect on the oceans than in air temperatures, yet we've passed a tipping point where many sea regions are consistently 3C warmer than pre-industrial era, and they are helping air temperatures set records too. Even since 2016, summer tropical North Atlantic ocean has been over 2C warmer than 2016. This region is also called "hurricane alley", and ocean heat has an exponential effect on hurricane strength.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments