this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
625 points (91.2% liked)

Fuck AI

2347 readers
689 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (23 children)

The Aral Sea is essentially gone and it was killed by poor Soviet planning. Capitalism was not the driving factor rather ignorance was and ignorance is held equally by all sides.

Capitalism isn’t the only thing driving environmental collapse. It’s industrialization

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (17 children)

Central planners in the Soviet Union didn't even have computers and they lacked the level of scientific understanding we have today of the environment, of our resources, and of the limits to growth. We've all heard about Mao killing the sparrows in China.

This isn't a reason to never try central planning again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (16 children)

They absolutely had computers, I have no idea why you would think the second largest economy that produced tremendous technological advances in its time did not have computers.You know Tetris was created by a Soviet programmer, right?

Planned economies are doomed at this point gecause we aren't able to predict distasters and the planned economy cannot respond in an efficient manner when things go wrong. Humans aren't smart enough and we do not have artificial intelligence capable of doing so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How old are you? Did you go through COVID? Capitalism doesn't do disasters well at all. Every cost is minimized. So emergency supplies go unmaintained. If it doesn't help the stock price annually it doesn't get done.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

50, yes and most nations did poorly the reason for America's failures have to do with American healthcare as most market economies handled it much better than the planned ones did. China did much worse but that rarely made China's news.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

American healthcare is capitalist. It's insurance companies and for profit hospitals. That's why it's bad. Healthcare is an inelastic demand.

China isn't a Democratic State. I'm not arguing that just having one guy handling all the economic planning is a good idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Im well aware of what a planned economy is as I have taken economics courses. Historically speaking planned economies have performed extremely poorly because humans are bad at predicting the future. Until circumstances change to the point where we can reliably predict the future planned economies will always perform poorly compared to market based ones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I don't disagree with that. Why leave that to the market which doesn't optimize for anything other than more money and whos actions are opaque? Happy, healthy, and productive societies cost money, money that can be spent elsewhere. Slavery is efficient and profitable.

If some organization is going to have the power to make or break me, I want them to be transparent and democratic. Not a rich person who has never worked in their life trying to make more money using whatever means they can get away with.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)