Same.
Shit sucks for us, but lifting the US boot off the neck of the world will make up for it.
Same.
Shit sucks for us, but lifting the US boot off the neck of the world will make up for it.
Critical support to Trump in his struggle against US hegemony.
Eat my shorts.
Thanks for reminding me this band exists.
Whatever you say Dunning-Kruger
Things aren't that far gone, yet.
Wake me up when Mexico/Canada join BRICS or the EU federalizes or something.
EU trades with Israel.
Wouldn't that just make them more reliant on the US for trade and funding?
You called me poorly educated. Was I supposed to be nice after that?
I literally recommend a specific book, do you think I'm so fucking stupid that I dont know what economics is? 😒
Related: MIT's pooled investments returned 8.9 percent last year and its endowment stands at $24.6 billion.
We largely have stuck with market based economies because they currently are much more responsive to changes.
No, we still have market based economies because they make a few people very very rich.
We needed markets before computers and instant mass communication. Things are different now
While computers have gotten more powerful there is zero evidence to support that we have gotten to the point where they could run a planned economy in any fashion.
What about the fact that market-based responses to COVID were universally worse than centrally planned responses?
Petition the central planners to offer something else. Central planning can still be democratic.
Well without the need to sell their art they could create whatever they want without fear of it being unmarketable. An artist could just create without needing to sell it to anyone.
Businesses do this all the time! They do market research to find out what people want, they monitor current events and customer demands and social media. There's no reason a central planner can't do the same.