this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
517 points (95.8% liked)

Fuck AI

8732 readers
1412 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

Rules:

You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.

Effective reports:

Less effective reports:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Not sure freedom to use apps is included in the US Constitution ..

[–] Kewlio250@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That would likely violate the first amendment. Many of the ways you use your phone are considered forms of speech/expression. Wholesale banning of sectors of these by a government is a legitimate violation of your rights.

Fuck AI, tho.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tell that to all the places that banned porn.

Originally porn was protected by the first amendment.

There's a whole movie about this called the people versus Larry flynt that kind of explains why.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, you see, something something God.

My god can beat up your god. Their name is "God That Beats Up Other Gods." Therefore you have to do what I say. I even got a note to that effect

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 2 points 23 hours ago

Religious Leader Zealots: "Yes, of course we are."

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

AI is something that violates every posible law (moral and legal). It should be hard banned.

[–] fristislurper@feddit.nl 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] incompetent@programming.dev 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] barnacles@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

AI quartered troops in my home.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In all seriousness, if someone wanted to sue that local government referring the first amendment, they would likely take the ban down.

That said, I don’t find any actual article from a reputable news outlet describing what actually happened and what is in the city council ordinance. Likely a brief unenforceable article, which, as such, has no bearing on anyone’s life.

A redditor mentioned they banned “self improving” ai, which, if true, would explain why it isn’t getting more coverage- this is a nothing burger.

[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A redditor mentioned they banned “self improving” ai, which, if true, would explain why it isn’t getting more coverage- this is a nothing burger.

The year is 2029, Meta's GrokBots have taken over the world. They approach Bloomington Indiana, their next target. A kindly older gentleman approaches the army on the outskirts of town.

"Sorry boys, we banned self improving AI back in 2026, you are not allowed here."

The robots nod and continue onward, parting around the outskirts of town like a river flowing around a rock.

The town is saved. It becomes the last bastion of humanity within 6 months.

a big sign outside town says

                                     :                                  
                                     ;;                                 
                                    / |                                   
                                   /  |                                 
                                 .'   :                                 
                              .-'     '                                  
                          _.-'       /                                   
                      .-*"          /                                _   
                   .-'            .'                            _.-*?'  
                 .'             .'                           .-"  .'    __  
               .'      ,     .-'                           .-+.  .' _.-*".'  
              /        \  .-'         _.--**""**-.     .-'  _.y-:-"   .'      
             :          `+.       .*""*.          `.  :-. -.     \  .'    
             ;        .--*""*--. / __   `  _.--.    \ |$| -.`   -.;/ _.-+.  
             :      .'          :*"  "*..*"          y`-' $|      ;*"  _(      
              \    /      +----/ / .'.-'---+  .-._.+' `.  -'_.--. :- "_(     
               `*-:       |    \/\/\/      | /)     `     .'___   ' "_(  
                  ;    `._|   robots.txt   | \  )`      .'.'   `./_" (   
                  :      \|                | (`._..--**" : .-    ; `"'   
                   \      |                |  `----**"T"" " `+.  |       
                    `.    |  Fuck off      |         '     .'    :            
                  _.-*"*- |  godsdamn      |            / /      '       
              .-*" _      |   toasters     |      __..-'\       /  
               "+,'___..--|                |--**""       `-.__.'            
                 ""       +----------------+                            

[–] Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's basically just writing a letter with extra steps

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

The output technically belongs to the AI company, does the first amendment apply to non human entities? If it does I don't think anyone should be supporting that application ..