this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
1203 points (98.9% liked)
Fuck AI
8737 readers
1693 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This one has a clear economic issue as well: AI synthesized speech burns a shitton of money but somehow replaces minimum wage work. No idea how they imagined it would work. And tokens only getting more expensive since they're currently heavily subsidized
What annoys me is that automating order taking doesn't require a full LLM. They could easily program a voice to text system with a library of food items, basic voice commands, and have the outputs display on the screen so that the user can verify and correct the order verbally.
Like smart tech doesn't need to know anything beyond it's job. But they're trying to normalize these massively superflous systems because the economics of big corporations has completely decoupled from reality. && Fascism.
I recall pretty reliable hotlines with just that, and when their schematic script was failing you, they refered you to a human operator. But it doesn't have an AI buzz around it, and on paper it isn't as simple and universal as a chatbot that can verbally answer any question by spending tokens on 3rd party's servers. I can see why this idea sells and why technical, ethical, economical and usability issues get overlooked by linkedin managers, but it doesn't make it less frustrating.
It's basically the hologram from i,Robot. https://youtu.be/ZKxr0wyIic4
The main thing is that a human with subject matter knowledge designed the phonetic library. AI sloppers are leaving that for the LLM to hallucinate.
Naw, audio doesn't take much, definitely not as much as a full time employee. The text models probably don't need to be very large for this, the whole thing can probably run on a modern phone.
With all the optimization that has been done, everything can be done pretty efficiently except for video and good image gen.
The main issue with all this is probably audio quality (wind + car running + garbage microphones)
Inference is actually relatively cheap. A company the size of McDonald's could also negotiate a deal.
Tokens are expensive for you but for the labs tokens are cheap, training is expensive.