looks like an amazing project to support
https://codeberg.org/NerdNextDoor/vim
https://mastodon.social/@mrmasterkeyboard/116192873098653079
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
322 points (93.5% liked)
Fuck AI
6279 readers
1336 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Didn't Torvald's already chew people out for committing vibe-coded crap? At least I can rest assured the Linux Kernel doesn't have dysfunctional generated code in it.
Vibe-coding =/= actual coding. He chewed out someone for committing code that was simply churned out by an AI without checking if it's actually functional code.
Lemme try find his email...
100% agree, but does your average Lemmy user know the difference between vibe coding vs actual coding using some AI tool? Is vim being vibe coded or are the maintainers just using some AI tools?
So.... typical Linus response to poor code. You'd don't really need a source, I've seen him go off on bad coders more than once, adding AI doesn't really change much.
I mean... He did say something along the lines of being incompetent for using AI. Or that incompetence made them use AI.
I think Linus sees some benefit in an AI tool catching problems in code you've written, but not as a crutch to vibe-code with.
Based
He sort of did the opposite. He chewed people out for trying to put anti AI language into the docs. He said in effect, "We can't tell if AI was used so it's stupid to add anti AI requirements."
I miss the old Torvalds.
He's the same but with less personal insults.
That's like a raw kernel downgrade! I wonder if Vintage Torvalds would have allowed AI into the kernel (Linux is now in the Open Slopware list because of that).
He's not requiring it or suggesting it. He is being pragmatic. If code passes human review, who submitted it doesn't matter.
Pragmatism has been his defining personality trait. It's why he has never cared if Linux is used for profit or military.
I can't tell if you're joking...
I'm not, unfortunately.