Fuck AI

Identifying the source of an article is very different from the common use case for search engines.

1:1 quotes of web pages is something conventional search engines are very good at. But usually you aren't quoting pages 1:1.

Is the plan for AI to give tech plausible deniablity when it lies about politics and other mis/dis information?

It’s just asking it m to find sources from excerpts. I don’t think this is something they have been trained on with much emphasis is it?

AI has its uses: I would love to read AI written books in fantasy games (instead of the 4 page books we currently have) or talk to a AI in the next RPG game, hell it might even make better random generated quests and such things.

You know, places where hallucinations don't matter.

AI as a search engine only makes sense when/if they ever find a way to avoid hallucinations.

Go figure, the one providing sources for answers was the most correct...But pretty wild how it basically leaves the others in the dust!

That's probably why I end up arguing with Gemini. It's constantly lying.

I mean, the tech is changing faster than science can analyize it, but isnt this now outdated?

I dont use AI but a friend showed me a query that returned the sources, most of which were academic and appeared trustworthy

AI can be a load of shite but I’ve used it to great success with the Windows keyboard shortcut while I’m playing a game and I’m stuck or want to check something.

Kinda dumb but the act of not having to alt-tab out of the game has actually increased my enjoyment of the hobby.

I like how when you go pro with perplexity, all you get is more wrong answers