this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
417 points (98.8% liked)

News

36270 readers
2679 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Protecting Law Enforcement Personnel. One of the Department of Justice's top priorities is protecting law enforcement at the federal, state, and local levels who protect us all. This includes aggressively investigating the all-too-common instances of violence against and obstruction of law enforcement, seeking the death penalty for those who perpetrate capital crimes against law enforcement, and backing and promoting the efforts of law enforcement when they are subjected to unfair criticism or attack.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 165 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing, and otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands and requests. The U.S. Attorneys' Offices and other litigating components of the Department shall investigate incidents involving any such misconduct for potential prosecution, including for obstructing federal functions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and violations of other statutes, such as 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1373.

This is how they're intending to respond to state and local authorities who, in compliance with their state law, refuse to assist ICE. This is setting the stage for federal vs state.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They never gave one fucking shit about "states rights."

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only states' rights to own slaves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't wait, guess I should buy a gun. Been stalling on that one. Not that owning a gun will make a lot of difference when the federal government decides you're an enemy of the state.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'll make it so that if you have to go down, you can take some fascists with you.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Shoot twice and go home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wasn't it pretty much always the case that the states couldn't prohibit federal immigration officers, its just that they gave absolutely zero help if they were resisting?

Edit: Oh, reading fail on my part " failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands". I get it now. Can that even be legal? What authority does ICE have over a state police officer?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Zero authority. But it's a stress test. Can we get judges to go along? Juries? What can we get them to believe is a legal command? Can we get ICE into houses without warrants? Can we prosecute Mayors and Police officials for not providing data that is a request?

They're going to push as far as people let them push. This is why the Federalist Society has been trying to pack the courts with conservative judges for decades. Defense Attorneys are going to have to step up and stop plea dealing so much stuff. But that's a lot harder to do than to say because they're criminally under resourced and over worked. (Not metaphorically in some states) In a system where the default is a plea deal to get out of jail there's going to be a lot of convictions for things that aren't actually crimes. The entire reliance on plea deals was predicated on good faith prosecutions.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

You're making the mistake of thinking they plan on obeying existing laws.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That'll be interesting to watch. The president and his cronies seem to forget that the federal government isn't the only group with a US military available to them.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'll be interesting to see what happens when a [State] National Guard receives mutually exclusive commands from [State] Governor and Little t.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago

God it's gotta be nice living in a state that isn't licking the boots.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My money is on that they either blew through or are about to blow through the ICE budget and are going to attempt to force the local, county, and state police to do ICE jobs. These big stupid actions ICE is doing is both inefficient and expensive and while they probably have a budget to do big shit every couple of months they probably dont have the manpower or money to do it constantly. Trying to force lower level law enforcement to do it is just the type of corporate influenced stupidity Musk and Trump would come up with.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 134 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn, those Jan 6 folks must be in a lot of trouble since quite a few directly attacked LEOs

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago

The Republican Way™

Rules for thee, not for me.

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That must be the limit. You shall only beat officers nearly to death with an American flag, any more than that and it's illegal. Seems reasonable.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But don't you dare express your right to free speech by (correctly) identifying a cop as a bastard!

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is attacking prosecutors and FBI agents.

Is the DOJ going after him?

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The hypocrisy that goes into all their messaging is just wild. 1. Kill capital police you are a political prisoner. 2. Your property gets raided by the FBI while your not even present (because your own lawyers negotiated the date/time) and you fuel the narrative they were trying to assassinate you.

And not to mention all the judges and clerks and courthouse staff he has put at risk and still somehow gets this "tough on crime pro police" messaging in the media without even an asterisk.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The gall... It's like at some point in 2016, he realized he could literally say anything, and half of the voting population will eat it up, and rub people's faces in it.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

He straight up said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and no one would do a thing. It's one of the few things he was right about

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

when they are subjected to unfair criticism or attack.

We don't like it when you point out that we mercilessly kill people for no reason and then get a pat on the back and paid time off!

This is the opposite of a police misconduct database.

Get ready to be jailed for saying stuff like All Cops Are Bastards.

Well, so are the judges and prosecutors if they allow this shit to fly.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly the line that stood out to me as well. There is way too much liberty in that wording, especially following a point of support for the death penalty.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

First amendment protections for speech expressing our grievances against our government are very well established. I think even this Supreme court will agree. We'll see, but this is basic free speech. There are people who are against free speech or waver depending on the kind of speech. I'm all for free speech, even what some would call hate speech. I'm an advocate, and I know the law and precedents. I don't think this has any legs.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think even this Supreme court will agree

Something about a summer child

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Just reported your comment to law enforcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 37 points 1 year ago

This will be used by sheriffs widely.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Both sides, amiright fellow citizens of the nation just north of the gulf of America?

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Fuck the police and who they fucking with

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We live in a fascist country.

[–] dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

do something about it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CentauriBeau@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

No, he just made it legal (or unpunishable) to bribe elected officials and corporations, particularly by other countries:

Shifting Resources in the National Security Division. To free resources to address more pressing priorities, and end risks of further weaponization and abuses of prosecutorial discretion, the Foreign Influence Task Force shall be disbanded. Recourse to criminal charges under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and 18 U.S.C. § 951 shall be limited to instances of alleged conduct similar to more traditional espionage by foreign government actors. With respect to FARA and § 951, the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, including the FARA Unit, shall focus on civil enforcement, regulatory initiatives, and public guidance.

The National Security Division's Corporate Enforcement Unit is also disbanded. Personnel

assigned to the Unit shall return to their previous posts.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Something something free speech absolutist?

They never were of course but they did gave Anarchist who actually are a bad name.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Transitional Organized Crime, Cartels, and Gangs.

Page 4. Either somebody lets the spell-check do auto-replace, or they are going hard on those dangerous hormone therapy peddlers.

Aww, who am I kidding? It's both!

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Fuck them and the newly fascist DOJ.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

obstruction of law enforcement, seeking the death penalty for those who perpetrate capital crimes against law enforcement

Wouldn't it be funny to see Elon and Snowden sitting together in Russia?

For very different reasons... One is a patriot, one is escaping consequences.

load more comments
view more: next ›