Maggoty

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

The ability to move without squeaking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not going to down vote you over it because most people outside the military don't know. But the Army just spent 10 years making a fitness test that more closely resembles combat tasks. Hegseth is not saying this in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

That's good for a few paychecks in the black couch industry...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

They were doing appointments according to C-Span.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

They still only have 20 percent of the country. After years. At this rate they will run out of people before Ukraine runs out of territory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Europe has 450 million people. It will be easier for them than Russia with 146 million people. Stop spreading FUD.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

As we all know, repeatedly drafting several divisions worth of men is a sign you're winning the war...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Oh the current standards in the US military are absolutely enough to make sure women can carry their load. Hegseth is a massive misogynist who believes women shouldn't be in combat for all kinds of unscientific reasons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Unconscious person in a building gets dragged out. But your gut feeling is right. A fighting unit needs 3 times the people behind it keeping it going. And units already routinely send the people they don't want to use on the front line to fetch food and whatnot for everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because standards are first and foremost about maintaining a healthy force. Then they find a number that allows for being healthy and operating in combat. That's the minimum and you get points for going above that, and discharged for not meeting it. I guarantee you they aren't keeping women around as a DEI thing where they're only equal on paper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

You forgot step 4.5, starve and under train 90 percent of your military while a super loyal 10 percent get the best training and rations in a Republican Guard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The Infantry already has a soft standard of scoring higher than minimum. You meet that or you get extra PT, no school slots, no promotions, and may even get transferred out of combat units. But also we've seen guys that did 180 (the minimum in 2003) operate perfectly fine in combat. This canard that combat arms needs more than a file clerk is just being used to exclude women. The minimum is actually high enough to operate in combat. Units are doing the higher soft standard because it's a way to operate at a higher level. But they will deploy someone doing a 180 on their test and put them in a squad that's fighting in a city after an 8km foot movement. Heck we would rather someone who scored the minimum but can walk with their gear than someone who scored higher but didn't have that walking endurance.

 

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast. 

 

A CBS News investigation found dozens of law enforcement leaders — sheriffs, captains, lieutenants, chiefs of police — buying and illegally selling firearms, even weapons of war, across 23 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., from the Deep South to the Midwest, Northeast and California coast.

 

That's it, include a link of course but otherwise it's unchanged.

 

Several people pointed out that our rules for behavior weren't immediately apparent. While I would say this shouldn't be an issue in a community about posting new communities, I have been proven wrong on multiple occasions. So I have made the list in our sidebar. These are a paraphrasing of Mastodon.World's rules. So there is no functional change. We will continue to use their rules as a master list. But they boil down to being civil. If you don't like something or someone and have no constructive criticism, then you just move on.

I'm going to put changes here as well so people on apps can see them easier.

The rules for behavior are a straight carry over of Mastodon.World’s rules. You can click the link but we’ve reposted them here in brief, as a guideline. We will continue to use the Mastodon.World rules as the master list. Over all, be nice to each other and remember this isn’t a community built around debate. For the rules about formatting your posts, scroll down to number 2.

  1. Follow the rules of Mastodon.world, which can be found here.(link)

A. Provide an inclusive and supportive environment. This means if it isn’t rule breaking and we can’t be supportive to them then we probably shouldn’t engage.

B. No illegal content.

C. Use content warnings where appropriate. This means mark your submissions NSFW if need be.

D. No uncivil behavior. This includes, but is not limited to: Name Calling; Bullying; Trolling; Disruptive Commenting; or Personal Criticisms.

E. No Harrassment. As an example in relation to Transgender people this includes, deadnaming, misgendering, and promotion of conversion therapy. Similarly Misogyny, Misandry, and Racism are also banned here.

 

Guys I understand there's big stuff going on in the world. This community though is really just about finding other communities. For now, on the theory that people kind of forgot where they were, some temp bans were handed out. I have no pretensions of this being c/news or something. But I also have no pretensions of this being c/news. It is absolutely beyond the pale to post your political broadsides here while people are trying to figure out the best place to have their community. The only way politics is acceptable here is if you're talking about opening or moving a community about politics or because of politics. And it should absolutely remain civil. A simple, "I don't like your ideology", is enough here.

 

Here we go again.

 

The Biden administration wants to set up a deconfliction line with China in much the same way they set one up with Russia during the Cold War. They're also signaling that future cooperation may come in the financial sector or by refining sanctions by tapping the Treasury Secretary as one of the next US officials to meet with Chinese leaders. The Commerce Secretary may also be about looking for a ways to offset the US bringing chip production home.

view more: next ›