
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Is this the original or did you create it?
It is from her post about it yeah.
https://anntelnaes.substack.com/p/why-im-quitting-the-washington-post
Yeah it says in the link it's a rough draft of the cartoon that got rejected which is probably why it looks a bit shopped.
I think, from top down - Altman, besos, zuckerberg, ???, and mickey (did iger donate?).
Who is the bottom person though? Doesn't look like him, but the Apple guy gave his protection money as well. And did Google bend the knee as well?
Okay, it was the LAtimes owner that also refused to endorse in editorial.
"The group in the cartoon included Mark Zuckerberg/Facebook & Meta founder and CEO, Sam Altman/AI CEO, Patrick Soon-Shiong/LA Times publisher, the Walt Disney Company/ABC News, and Jeff Bezos/Washington Post owner."
Mickey is a reference to ABC, which is owned by Disney, cowing to Trump.
Tim Cook just recently donated, so maybe him? Or even if not, worth the mention
Edit: oops it’s late and I missed “Apple guy” or “tim Apple” as trumps 5yo brain can remember
Oof that's a good one too.
MVP thanks x
Jeff, Zuck, is that Spez? And I'm not sure who's puckering up with the lipstick.
I think it’s the open AI guy

Voltaire never said that. He lived under a monarchy, so it wouldn't have made sense if he did. That quote was made up by a neo nazi and falsely attributed to him.

And it's completely bullshit, just phrased so people think it's "old timey", it's always been an issue but more so since social media. People just believe anything with a Historical figure's name at the end.
-William Shakespeare
I like big butts and I cannot lie
-George Washington
That was benjamin franklin
DJ Benji Frank
I fuck with that
-Oscar Wilde
Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder
-Sir Mix-A-Lot
Shakespeare predicted social media? He truly was a visionary.
Woosh
I understand the joke just fine but I don't think you understood mine. That's OK though, it wasn't a very good one.
Still a good message though
That depends on how you define "not allowed to criticise".
To the neo-Nazis who invented and popularized the phrase, it means "People calling me an asshole when I say bigoted shit." They use it as part of their constant refrain that they're being "censored" by people who refuse to give them a platform to spew their poison.
It is a good message, but one that can easily be twisted into something very dangerous if you're not careful.
Interesting. I wasn't familiar with the backstory, thanks!
Most truths are double edged, if not multiple edged, like throwing stars.
Broken clock etc
Not really. You just interpreted it in a less shitty way than intended.
Some people see a half empty glass, others a half full glass. It's a half glassed either way.
We must rise up against children with terminal illnesses.
I, for one, welcome our terminally ill child overlords.
Jonathan Swift has entered the chat
-Michael Scott
I wonder if the Post will elevate another, more pliant, cartoonist to take her place and draw about the news whilst careful to not skewer the powerful, or instead decide that this is about Innovation, and from now on, cartoons will be AI-generated?
Oh god, I could totally see them switching to AI cartoons. Bezos can write the prompts himself.
“My decision was guided by the fact that we had just published a column on the same topic as the cartoon and had already scheduled another column – this one a satire – for publication.”
It’s hard to make an argument that they are protecting Bezos if they already had 2 other articles criticizing him. But then why not just delay the cartoon?
Trump would never read the articles. But he would see the cartoon.
He'd have to have someone explain it to him though.
explain it to him
That's not usually how he operates.
Exactly, delay it a few days if it's "too similar". Cop out answer.
The comment was super weasely. "On the same topic" could mean anything. Based on what he says, the articles don't need to mention Bezos at all.
Media being owned by a few rich people was and always has been dangerous for press freedom.
I can only really see workers co-ops striking the correct balance here. (Basically, editor makes decisions, when needed workers vote on whether to publish or not).
Capitalism is always the problem, and anti-democratic.
Editorial independence!
Not surprised they refused.