this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
446 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22651 readers
1797 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they keep jailing people for protesting, we should send in Shrekbots with strapons and tell them to complete the job at any cost.

But, thankfully, they were wise enough to only jail for a day. Also, be more creative, I know a certain image on the sodium site that would instill grave fear.

But we don't send that... Yet.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shrap-ons was right there dude.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yet the 34 count felon, rapist, traitor, document thief among other likely crimes, was not held in jail at all, just got his silly pic he sells now.

This is my thread people, move along

[–] Rumo161@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Beging arrested for enjoying a succulent cartoon dick?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As a former columbus resident I'm gonna guess this is the rooster. Sounds up his alley.

Edit: ayy

The blogger, D.J. Byrnes, runs The Rooster political website.

The Shrek image may have been crude or vulgar. But in context, there is no serious argument Byrnes sent it to arouse anyone’s sexual interest.

Speak for yourself!

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I have to see Trump's fat ass in the news every day, can we get a criminal complaint about how that is harassment to our fucking eyes?

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

And ears and brains

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 96 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What do you mean not the onion? I have it on good authority ogres are like onions.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

they saute pretty nice in butter

Enough to make you cry.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheShamMirrors@lemmy.today 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay so this is some Kentucky Fried Bullshit.

I thought we lived in 'Murica, mkay?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] diocesegoldmine@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Ik this won't be a popular take because, as evidenced by this very comment section even, critical thinking isn't popular, but this is sexual harassment. Sending people porn non-consentually is sexual harassment. Yes, even when the person you're sexually harassing a piece of shit themselves, is that seriously a hard concept to grasp?? This dude is a piece of shit too if he thinks it's okay to send someone porn without consent.

EDIT: Harassment not assault.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Generally, harassment is a course of conduct over a period of time, not a one-off. The bar for a one-off encounter being harassment of any kind is high, with good reason.

That reason, to me, is that any reasonable person should be robust enough that all but the most serious, malicious communication should be something they can shrug off without much ill effect if it's a single isolated message. Getting a picture of a wanking cartoon character and a disparaging message isn't going to be pleasant for most people, sure, but if that's it?

The logic behind punishment for sexual harassment is not - or should not - be any different from the logic behind punishment for non-sexual harassment; it should be proportional to the harm caused, and it should take the same standard of a "person of reasonable firmness" or whatever the legalese is.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Did you read the linked article?

If so, could you be so kind as to speak to why you disagree with its unusually thorough and detailed legal analysis of the matter at hand?

The Shrek image may have been crude or vulgar. But in context, there is no serious argument Byrnes sent it to arouse anyone’s sexual interest, let alone that it satisfies the Miller test. Byrnes sent it to another adult, reportedly accompanied by political commentary describing Cirino as “Young Mussolini.” That’s protected political mockery, not obscenity.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i can't take an article or author serious when they argue shreenis is not titillating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sexual harassment, not assault

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LazyOldPervert@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So uhh.... Is it ya know... Big?

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think he wears pants instead of a loincloth?

[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fiona being cursed to turn into an ogre at night was a blessing in disguise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Feels like everyone should make all their avatars Shrek’s penis.

[–] TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would in a heartbeat if just for a day or two, but I suspect it's not allowed?

EDIT: I did it, but I pixelated it. Hopefully I won't get banned for that.

[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Wing the change you want to see in the world! Respect!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haven't read the article, but I'm wondering if this is the line Ted Cruz has drawn on Internet Comment Etiquette. If he still tweets at him.

didn't you hear ted cruz is head of the internet shrek penis taskforce

load more comments
view more: next ›