this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
158 points (99.4% liked)

/0

2201 readers
255 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

FYI admins

cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/c/fediverse/p/1066667/tesseract-dev-injects-malicious-code-into-browser-to-illegally-ddos-the-dbzer0-instance

As part of the devs farewell message on their site, they have included malicious code to make each visitor sends 2,000 requests to the dbzer0 servers in an attempt to DDOS and take the instance offline.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 hours ago

dubvee.org is down

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 hour ago

It just gets worse and worse. I figured that the goodbye message he posted wouldn't be the end of it. Thankfully it seems to be down now so it's not causing harm anymore directly but still.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

Actual lmao

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

"Tesseract dev found to have world's smallest and most rancid penis."

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Im sure some shitlibs will still defend this

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Where is @Kirk@startrek.website when you need him most?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

not convinced that's not a sock puppet, from all the stuff I've seen so far

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

He kept claiming they're AP, but refused to provide proof. Not sure but as it happens, startrek.website defederated us as soon as we banned him.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 30 minutes ago

Huh, weird how the framing of the defedederation lines up so well to what ap and Kirk would say.

https://startrek.website/post/42709922

If you’re not familiar with how Lemmy/the Fediverse works, basically everything you read at StarTrek.website is hosted by us, even if the content originated elsewhere. That means we are responsible for everything here and we have to decide if we are comfortable boosting content from other instances.

If you’re curious, the final straw here was learning that db0 explicitly allows hosting discussions about hurting people, which needless to say goes against our instance values and we simply don’t have the manpower to moderate that volume of content incoming from their server to a degree that we feel meets our quality standards, which left defederating as the only viable option.

In keeping in line with past trends we’re announcing this because is is a larger instance and don’t want to leave any of the crew confused as to why something may be missing.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 55 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Gotta say, I've enjoyed this whole drama. This seems like the end of the story arc. It's been fun guys. Better than beans.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, also this makes me really happy that we're on the fediverse. Turns out some part of the system is run by a strange control freak? Swiftly replace the part and everyone moves along.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Ironic Twist:

  • It's a Journey Of The Hero story and this part was just the initial fall of the Hero.
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I hope it's the end but like the piefed stuff we think it's done then something else comes up.

Plus the dev/user/admin of dubvee has said a few times they're leaving only to be back soon after saying that. Hell there were two or three announcements tesseract work was stopped 🤷

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 38 minutes ago

Piefed dev doing something similar on the flagship instance, and has some odd philosophies on what should be filtered out in the code.

When people started pointing it out and asking questions called it harassment and tried to get instances to instance ban them all.

Best part was insulting everyone looking at the code if you didn't ask on their specific comm.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 7 points 4 hours ago

Gotta leave the door open for a next season sequel with a sneaky post credits scene.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

I dunno, this opens the author up to a lot of consequences other people might choose to pursue.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed. I usually don’t care about online drama at all, but at least this has been… amusing.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The memes have been fresh!

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 13 points 4 hours ago

You deserve more credit. Thanks for bringing it to everyone’s attention!

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

What a sad individual.

I mean it, I'm not being sarcastic. I genuinely feel sorry for them. The fact they feel they had to do this, probably knowing they'd get caught.

It's a classic cry for help. This dev is not in a good place. Perhaps they have found themselves isolated.

Of course that often happens when you act like a tiny dicked loser.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Sometimes the kind of crap done by people who are selfish wankers is just that - crap - not a cry for help.

Certainly in my personal experience people who haven't actually grown up as persons to become mature adults don't actually see the problems that they repeateadly get into with everybody else because of having the emotional complexity and impulse control of toddlers as their fault, but rather as the fault of others.

There's no cry for help in their actions because they don't think they need help.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

I'd gather that he is a massive control freak. Hard to feel sorry for him right now really but I agree it must be a sad life.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's a metaphorical tiny dick, unrelated to any actual body.

Like small dick energy, you know?

But thanks for policing me there pal, I appreciate that.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, tiny dick is an attitude not limited to penis havers nor defined by penis size so we say “main character syndrome”.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Thanks, that's a better way of explaining it.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

This whole thing reminds me of the guy (Angled/LMAO) 3 years ago that was all butthurt after he got busted trying to take all the good sublemmy names, and responded by posting a bunch of disgusting stuff with alts and DOSing lemmy.world.

Edit https://lemmy.world/post/1720870

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

This was a blast from the past.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 7 hours ago

What a loser. Tiny whiny loser.

Fabulous reaction time from db0 & team!

So who is this loser, I mean it's a tiny whiny bit illegal what he did it seems...

[–] minty@aussie.zone 25 points 7 hours ago

Wow lmao. This is crazy levels of petty

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Already known and mitigated.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Not to expose anything that’s best left internal, but is this something the proof of work check handles? Is it something that’s been implemented in advance? Just curious, if you can talk about it at all. I’m woefully undereducated on the actual ins and outs of the web.

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

They can block requests from a specific origin or implement tailored rate limiting rules or disable CORS from that instance. Probably more too

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

For this kind of stuff you can easily ask an llm and it will give you a pretty decent rundown of mitigation tactics

[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 18 points 7 hours ago

What the actual fuck? This idiot may have his braindead opinions and do to his OSS project whatever he wants (so sag I wasn't on the list), but that is just such a fucked up thing to do.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if you could actually track him down and prosecute him for it...

[–] wiccan2@thelemmy.club 18 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The domain seems to be registered to SquareSpace so his details are hidden from public view but there is a SquareSpace abuse email and US phone number.

I suspect in the first instance if db0 complained to them the site would be shutdown and SquareSpace would then have to comply with any legal action.

INAL but I strongly suspect that the DDOS would constitute a crime in the US where the domain is registered.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 6 hours ago

Yup. Anyone knowingly assisting would also be implicated. Afaik, the precedent was set about 20 years ago with the whole LOIC/anonymous ddos.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nah he's hosted on inmotion. I already bipped 'em

[–] wiccan2@thelemmy.club 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The domain is registered to SquareSpace: https://who.is/whois/dubvee.org

The IP associated with the domain points to Inmotion: https://who.is/whois-ip/ip-address/107.161.30.39

Looks like both are true, hopefully Inmotion will take appropriate action based on your report. Worthwhile reporting to SquareSpace too so he can't just rehost an attack elsewhere.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Registrar and hosting are different things.

Registrar is who you bought and manage the domain name you use on your site through. Hosting is where it lives.

Most domain name registrars do not give a single shit what you do with a domain name, unless they're somehow on the hook. Hosting on the other hand.....

[–] wiccan2@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 hours ago

I understand how it works.

All I'm saying is the registrar should also be notified otherwise the site can be moved to another hosting platform.

If the registrar can be convinced to take action, at least the domain can't be used for future attacks.

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Idk what this tesseract is and at this point I'm too afraid to ask