Looks like the instance went down a bit earlier than expected
db0
FYI, if you want a defed vote, just start it. Any member with access to vote can open a governance thread. https://github.com/db0/threativore/blob/main/README_manual.md#governance
If you don't feel confident about opening the thread ofc, you can always request one of the admins does it.
Goddamn that person is really a piece of work
Piefed already tried exactly that and had to revert because it's indistinguishable from vote manipulation
Not really a design choice. It's just not possible to hide due to federation
Please follow the instructions for this community. This post is way too vague
Early lemmy was not good at telling people if their application got rejected. Now you should know
My plan for old age is the collapse of civilization.
Joking aside, I don't consider pensions "passive income" as I've been actually paying money all my working life. I do consider the whole pension system a joke and a scam most of the time and it can actually be exploitative, but at least those in it typically have to be productivity most of their lives. But ultimately the pension system should also be scrapped and replaced by a straight up social net funded by the state, if we're talking about staying in capitalism.
My point is, even a racist bridge has uses as a bridge. The solution is not to tear down the bridge, it's to address the systematic racism. Likewise with GenAI tech, we are not involved in making it, nor do we promote that the way it was created was correct. We just say that people using it are not necessarily reinforcing the problem, anymore than a random pedestrian crossing that bridge would be reinforcing racism.
Yes, the way the tech was created and is being used, is problematic; an imperfect creation of a deeply flawed system. I'm not disputing that. I'm disputing that any and all uses of an imperfect creation are by necessity "fascist"
I feel the author routinelly conflates technology with technological implementations to make their point. For example, they conflate surveillance, with camera equipment and they conflate bridges, with city planning. What me and others are pointing out, is that we're not hostile to GenAI as the technology (like cameras, bridges) but we're absolutely against the popular (i.e. corporate) GenAI implementations.
I feel there's no harm whatsoever to use GenAI to personal gratification. Games, Porn, Shortcuts on boring but known tasks etc. But there's absolutely harm to using corporate AI to do so, and there's absolutely harm in using it for purposes outside of it (facts, propaganda, agents etc)
And yes, any technology built in capitalist systems, will be inevitably corrupted from its inception from those systems. This is not exclusive to GenAI as a technology however.
We don't consider that.

Eh, there's not really much urgency here. It's not like these actions are driving our users away.