It looks like a piece of jewelry with a glowing stone in it. The outer edge of it look like some kind of metal.
Draconic_NEO
I think this person is either a troll or doesn't understand the nature of these situations because Leni is, in her own words "a non-transgender woman" and also is not being slandered but has actually engaged in bad faith interactions like Nazi apologia, and literal transphobia herself.
Dragonfucker is a weird and uncomfortable situation because people were and still are misgendering them (including ironically OOP) but dragonfucker was not ejected from many Lemmy instances and communities because of their pronouns but because of misgendering, sealioning, and literal harassment of users of users.
Looking at it more I really don't think this person is acting in good faith at all, since they chose the worst people to represent in their arguments. I absolutely do think that Lemmy, especially on bigger instances or ones with more agnostic moderation, have problems with transphobia and bigotry as a whole (especially of the thinly veiled variety). But I would never suggest that two of the most prolific trolls on this platform are innocent victims.
The ml servers should be avoid though since ml has many problems with censorship, power-tripping, and pushing an agenda.
Well they don't have to show up as hashtags to users on Lemmy, they can show up as their own designated tags you add to the post on creation of editing. Just some form of post tags to indicate the category of a post (could even be specific to communities like subreddit flairs) but they would show up as hashtags on Mastodon, similar to how Lemmy already embeds a hashtag of the community into posts.
I liek Lemonade and I also like [email protected], unfortunately Lemmynade isn't quite ready yet and might not ever be.
Do you plan to introduce some kind of post tags into Lemmy, preferably something that will behave like Hashtags on Mastodon and other activitypub platforms? I know that Lemmy has been embedding community name as a hashtag for a while now, though having tags that can be populated by users would help discovery greatly.
Never heard of that one, but it does sound very weird, and also a bit gross.
I agree. Their comment is probably one of the more useless comments I've encountered on the subject.
I think the story of Whatsapp should've taught people that capitalist fuckery and living long enough to become the villain are bigger threats than people give credit for, and Signal is just as vulnerable to this as WhatsApp was. They've also fought against any ways that it could be mitigated, they fought and are still fighting unofficial clients (moxie himself went around harassing people to stop), they fought any form of decentralization or interoperability with other servers and self-hosting.
All things that could make signal a bit more resistant towards something like what happened with WhatsApp, yet they've all been rejected in favor of exclusive control on the app (and for a long time it was GMS tied on the PlayStore) and exclusive control of the the network. Two things that don't exactly bode well for the future.
Why are you getting downvoted for sharing facts?