this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
856 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

20710 readers
464 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged, but keep it in good faith and never punch down.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 82 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

>nobody
You should be slapped as well then.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 41 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For some reason your comment makes me think of this

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

would it be more grammatically correct if he said "with enough derogation"?

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, but I think that playing with the grammar is part of the joke, as if derogatory is quantifiable.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm about to slap you both. For the lulz.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Like The Three Stooges.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

That explains why the Sith were rarely seen in the sciences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 83 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago (13 children)

no science teacher would ever say that.

Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible...

and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).

[–] mrsemi@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (6 children)

no science teacher would ever say that.

Careful with those absolute statements there buddy. I was told the same by a teacher, who challenged the class to come up with natural examples of either straight lines or perfect circles. He talked about how such things cannot exist because at high enough resolution/magnification there will always be interruptions.

Your own example of light traveling in straight lines doesn't account for the fact that photons are waves and absolutely do not travel in straight lines.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (7 children)

they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though.

space time is curved, not the light path.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit?

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through.

it has choice anxiety.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, sorry for the confusion, I was referring to the single-slit experiment, I wasn't giving light a choice.

that's worse :(

let light be free

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I work in public education. That's a pretty innocuous statement compared to some of the shit I've heard. Some teachers get so complacent in their lessons that they forget to apply it in their critical-thinking. Then, they have some crazy logical lapse, say something ridiculous out loud, and then some other kid from that class repeats that same shit to their own students when they grow up. These are mistakes that could easily be rectified with an apology or deliberate correction, but teachers are pushed so hard to prioritize being an authority figure that they sometimes forget to just be a teacher.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that.

yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You'll hear no arguments from me.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And this is why absolute statements are generally bad arguments. It only takes one example to disprove them.

[–] Superdooper@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Only Siths deal in absolutes

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 22 hours ago

Mostly Siths deal in absolutes.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No scientists ever said that.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say they did. I was commenting on the meme and speaking generally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wildcats are nature, they have multiple very sharp corners.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No need to go that far, I have one set of sharp corners sitting right on my lap. Also help, I'm trapped. :(

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

Your lap has been chosen! You cannot move until you are allowed to move.

[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

those lines are never straight...

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

just because someone calls themself a scientist doesnt mean they are, as evidenced by that post

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

what about evil wizards who call themselves scientists? legit, or no?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

well done OP, you really stuck it to those stupid scientists

/s

[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 18 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Most scientists won't say that there are no straight lines in nature, it's so obviously and provably wrong. I think it's more of a thing philosophically said when talking about how modern life is so different and unnatural compared to the lives of ancient people or animals.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Bismuth has joined the chat

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does it still have straight lines if you look really closely?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Well, no. If you look closely enough, no lines exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›