this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
851 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

20690 readers
1859 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrsemi@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (6 children)

no science teacher would ever say that.

Careful with those absolute statements there buddy. I was told the same by a teacher, who challenged the class to come up with natural examples of either straight lines or perfect circles. He talked about how such things cannot exist because at high enough resolution/magnification there will always be interruptions.

Your own example of light traveling in straight lines doesn't account for the fact that photons are waves and absolutely do not travel in straight lines.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It travels in a straight line, just not in every dimension. Look at a waveform from above, it's a straight line.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh sure, bring evidence into it 🙄 lol. Um, how about sound waves?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sound waves are compressive waves, they radiate spherically (in principle, turbulence in the medium is going to make them slightly irregular)

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

they do tavel in a perfectly straight line though.

space time is curved, not the light path.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What about the fact that light bends around corners? Notably the interference pattern when shining light through a slit?

Stop being mean to light by making it choose what slits to go through.

it has choice anxiety.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

False because they are affected by gravity, even if ever so slightly

[–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But isn't the gravity bending the space, so the light itself is travelling straight but seems curved to the observer?

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, I’m not actually sure. Are we also ignoring refraction and reflection because the path is straight between those? If we’re talking discrete photons, you may be correct about each segment in its path being perfectly straight, but I’m not a theoretical physicist.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

gravity isn't a force, it's the curvature of space-time itself.

light follows a perfectly straight line through vacuum. the space itself isn't straight.

like drawing a straight line on a flat paper, if you roll the paper, that line is still straight within it's medium.

Newtonian gravity has been replaced by General relativity, and has been proven to be the correct model (at least more correct than Newtonian gravity).

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Makes sense to me. Thanks

[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago
[–] Klear@piefed.world 3 points 2 days ago

In that case that Pyrite proves nothing.

Photons are both particles and waves, not only waves (that's because of the wave-particle duality discovered by/after Einstein's theories).

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

But photons are also particles.