this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
849 points (97.2% liked)

Science Memes

20690 readers
1807 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

those lines are never straight...

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

well done OP, you really stuck it to those stupid scientists

/s

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And this is why absolute statements are generally bad arguments. It only takes one example to disprove them.

[–] Superdooper@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Only Siths deal in absolutes

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No scientists ever said that.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't say they did. I was commenting on the meme and speaking generally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wildcats are nature, they have multiple very sharp corners.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

No need to go that far, I have one set of sharp corners sitting right on my lap. Also help, I'm trapped. :(

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 3 points 13 hours ago

Your lap has been chosen! You cannot move until you are allowed to move.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just because someone calls themself a scientist doesnt mean they are, as evidenced by that post

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what about evil wizards who call themselves scientists? legit, or no?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does it still have straight lines if you look really closely?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Well, no. If you look closely enough, no lines exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 80 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Worked as a physicist for 30 years, nobody talks like that. Everyone else in the room is to smart, and will slap you down for using absolutes.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

>nobody
You should be slapped as well then.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm about to slap you both. For the lulz.

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Like The Three Stooges.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For some reason your comment makes me think of this

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

would it be more grammatically correct if he said "with enough derogation"?

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Yes, but I think that playing with the grammar is part of the joke, as if derogatory is quantifiable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 83 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I can’t quite get over the fact that the premise is false

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Memes like this are so dumb. Laugh tracks for the internet.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (32 children)

no science teacher would ever say that.

Light travels in a straight line, plenty of crystals, linear erosion, many trees evolved to be as straight as possible...

and to be esoteric, every object path, even when gravity affects them (they travel in a perfectly straight line, but it is spacetime that is curved).

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I work in public education. That's a pretty innocuous statement compared to some of the shit I've heard. Some teachers get so complacent in their lessons that they forget to apply it in their critical-thinking. Then, they have some crazy logical lapse, say something ridiculous out loud, and then some other kid from that class repeats that same shit to their own students when they grow up. These are mistakes that could easily be rectified with an apology or deliberate correction, but teachers are pushed so hard to prioritize being an authority figure that they sometimes forget to just be a teacher.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm going to pull a no true Scotsman, no good teacher would say that.

yhea, there are teachers that lose it a bit.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

You'll hear no arguments from me.

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›