this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
80 points (94.4% liked)

Canada

12166 readers
818 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

June 10, 202612:07 PM EDT:

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. President ​Donald Trump ‌said on Wednesday ​that he ​might not renew ⁠the ​USMCA free ​trade deal with Canada and ​Mexico. Speaking ​at the White House, ‌the ⁠president said he was ​discussing ​the ⁠matter with Mexican ​and ​Canadian ⁠leaders.

Reporting by Bo Erickson ⁠and ​Gram ​Slattery; Editing by ​Doina Chiacu

archive.org archive link: https://web.archive.org/save/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Ftrump-says-he-might-not-renew-usmca-2026-06-10%2F

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Today's edition of: Trump Said Something Dumb Again For Attention

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

More like market manipulation for personal gain.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

It was and still is the most obvious conclusion of this struggle. He's a person who hates free trade, and it's a free trade agreement.

The game for our federal government has basically been to trick him into signing on anyway, or at least delay him leaving.

Edit: I should mention he can't just withdraw the normal way without congress, which makes it easier for us.

[–] GrackleBirb@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And we need to steel ourselves for the "CARNEY DID IT - TINY PP WOULD HAVE BROUGHT IT HOME NOW WE CAN'T HAVE KRISPY KREME AND CHICK-FIL-A ...." - I think people don't fully appreciate that the only way to divest ourselves from Trump's insanity and vagaries w.r.t. oh anything is to make new friends, new alliances, and accept the extreme difficulty that comes with that which means Depression-era relief and strong investment in other partners and no, this won't bear fruit in one election cycle or even one quarter, not even in one year. In today's misinformation hellhole people literally hang on to every even vague word and go into a rage if their cable bill isn't lowered. There's no easy way to do this.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, that's basically the government's official policy right now, and they're doing well in the polls.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was NAFTA then he cancelled that and created a new agreement in his first term, now he doesn't like his own deal. This guy is literally the worst

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why bother reporting what Trump says? It's not usable information unless it's said to manipulate markets.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

But it was said to manipulate markets...

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hmm, are you actually trading on this, then?

I've been looking at oil futures actually believing Trump, and then correcting back when he's full of shit, and thinking maybe this is a rare case where the market could be timed.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, god, don't trade on anything he says. The trades have already happened, they could be lining up a short right after selling their longs, or vice versa, and then he'll say something else to send it in the opposite direction.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, usually that's true of anything you could trade on. Either the facts are already priced in or the irrationality could last longer than any available options contract (like with the AI bubble).

If I had been trading at certain critical moments recently I would have made a profit, though.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I've tried the George Costanza Investment Method: I do exactly the opposite of what I actually think I should do, and make money. Unfortunately, I don't apply it often enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Almost certainly the dumbest president the USA has ever had.

[–] mech@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago

And that includes Wilson after his stroke, and Kennedy after he was shot.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That would be cataclysmic for the economy of all three nations. Truly an unforced error. I really think it's just bluster though.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is we should all be preparing for the worst because doing the absolute worst most self-destructive thing possible is exactly what Trump does in almost every circumstance and always has.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Yes regardless of bluster or not we should be divesting from US trade and diversifying with other partners.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's saying it because he thinks he can get more concessions from both countries if he threatens to tank the deal.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's like negotiating with a terrorist. It is all in bad faith and his goal is to terrorize, not make a deal. His deals are not even worth the paper they are printed on. We should tell them to pound sand, they will only make a deal that is a zero-sum where they are in the positive.

[–] Carbonman@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

We should primarily not respond to Trump or the US ambassador's inflammatory remarks and keep finding new trading partners. Any verbal emotion based reaction serves as an excuse for them to do something against our existing trade with them.

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

It's not bluster, the moron wants to end free trade with everyone in favour of his tariff regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"The three countries need to approve a renewal of their existing agreement by July 1 or signal their ​intention to exit the pact, a process that would take 10 ​years and would buy time for alterations."

I feel like nobody is understanding this part

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why assume that they will abide by that?

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the rules of the agreement don't matter anyway, then why is Trump bothering to talk about not renewing it?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

then why is Trump bothering to talk about not renewing it?

Because he has a pathological need to see his name in the headlines on a daily basis.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I think it's more that his only negotiation tactic is to threaten to do something drastic, like cancelling "the deal" (or military attack), then wait for weakness/capitulation to push for more concessions. Over and over again.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I agree that seems to be his signature move.

And it hasn't occurred to him that anyone (or everyone) might figure it out...

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

CUSMA is going away and while business won't end between the US and Canada, it will plummet. Look to CETA/CPTPP/MERCOSUR, and our other FTA's for growth. Alter your supply chains away from the US, reduce the pressure point leverage they have. Don't view this as doom and gloom, but as a time to pivot and woo the opportunities the US chases away. We have what the world needs.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That’s OK. China will happily sign an economically beneficial agreement with them and the US will get fucked again by trump’s stupidity.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

He's following the same stupid playbook his whole life: pretend you dont want the deal, shit on everything.

Meanwhile.... it's 2026 and Canada and Mexico just need to kick the ball forward for 24 months. You think someone who won a FIFA medal would appreciate that.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

The free trade deals with low income countries should be renegotiated. Obviously prez is the last one to improve them. But the part about investors being able to sue a country for lost profits if government cancels their business plans needs to be removed as well.

This is a union issue, and a human rights issue. The president co opted it, and now every dumbass liberal defends the unfair trade system because the dumbass president is crittizing it. And that's why liberal fucking lose.

Allowing foreign countries to let our corporations outsource labor and pay them starvation wages and pollute to sell those goods back here has destroyed this country, and handed the previous gains of working people back to the bosses.

There should be no tariffs on goods from countries with adequate labor, environmental, and human rights standards, candad and europe there should be none. SE asia, and mexico even, pay your workers and don't dump pollution or face penalties, is what we should want. To lift up foreign workers, not exploit them.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

And Canada cheered, hopefully our politicians are able to find a way out of it before that though.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah. Let's get Yemen on-board. The theme song is already there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Should be MCCA Mexico Cuba Canada Agreement if I had my way anyway

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Like the TPP, the problems went away as soon as the US left.

load more comments
view more: next ›