this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
149 points (96.3% liked)

Cyanide & Happiness

1322 readers
219 users here now

About

Hello fellow Cyanide and Happiness fans!

Cyanide & Happiness (C&H) is a webcomic created by Rob DenBleyker, Kris Wilson, Dave McElfatrick and Matt Melvin. The comic has been running since 2005 and is published on the website explosm.net along with animated shorts in the same style. Matt Melvin left C&H in 2014, and several other people have contributed to the comic and to the animated shorts

Read more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyanide_%26_Happiness

Hope you enjoy and feel free to contribute to the community with art, media, cool stuff about the authors, tattoos, toys and anything else, as long it’s Cyanide & Happiness related!

History

@MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works started this community and wrote:

About this community and how I post the comics… Many moons ago, I would ask my Dad to save the newspaper for me everyday so I could read my favorite comic strips. Of course these days you can read your favorite comics online instead of a newspaper, but I love the nostalgia of reading the daily comics. Anyway, one of my favorite current comics is Cyanide and Happiness and I will be posting the daily release from their website (https://explosm.net/) and a an extra or two randoms.

Related Communities

Subscribe to all the daily comic communities!

Fine Print

All comics posted are freely available online. In no way is the poster claiming ownership, copyright or anything else. This is a not for profit community, we just want to enjoy our comics, thank you.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Dude...duder...or duderino, if your not into the whole brevity thing

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 2 points 59 minutes ago

What??! There’s no β€œdudette”? 😱 My whole life has been a lie.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

As someone who has spent half their life in California, this is accurate.

"I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, cause we're all dudes"

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

"I have had sex with X number of dudes" - doesn't sound all that gender neutral.

Same with 'guy': "how many guys have you kissed" isn't asking the same question as "how many people have you kissed."

"How many dudes do you live with?" isn't gender neutral, if you think it's just an intimacy thing. How many dudes were at the party? It isn't intimacy, intimacy is just an interesting way of making homophobic men confront the "dude isn't gender neutral" argument though.

So, what's actually happening in that 2nd panel? By all means, use dude how you like, just be honest about it.

I have, a couple of times, made men live their "dude is gender neutral" truth. Turns out telling people they are married to a dude, went to a party and kissed that dude one time, asking about their 2 dudes they have for parents, isn't such a great time for them. Just be honest about it.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There's also just the basic fucking courtesy of not using certain terms to describe someone if they ask you not to. If you address people of all genders as "dude" and a trans woman asks you not to refer to her that way, the correct response is "okay I'll do my best not to refer to you with that term," not "actually I use dude when referring to women sometimes so maybe you should just stop having a problem with it."

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app 3 points 1 hour ago

It's embarrassingly simple to come up with post hoc arguments for why refering to women as dude is fine actually.

Much harder to introspect and determine where that behaviour stems from, then acknowledge the place it stems from is toxic, and start changing. Harder still to unlearn a habit I put 30+ years into learning.

[–] joyjoy@piefed.social 18 points 2 hours ago

"I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes. Hey!" - "We're all dudes" from Good Burger.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

When Dude is directed AT someone ("Hey, Dude!"), it's definitely gender neutral. And when using it at the beginning of the sentence, it's just an exclamation like Damn, Shit, or God ("Dude, that was crazy").

But words change meaning slowly and its use in the way you describe is indeed still gendered. Guy is the same way albeit much further behind.

I stand by that dude is gender neutral if for no other reason than to reclaim it as such. It's a great word that's fun to say. So from one male dude to every non-male dude, get in on these fun linguistics! Dude is gender neutral if you say it is.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So from one male dude to every non-male dude, get in on these fun linguistics! Dude is gender neutral if you say it is.

I get what you're trying to say, but you gotta realize that for people who do not want to be called "dude" because it does have certain gendered connotations, this doesn't come across well.

You're basically saying "I've already decided this term is gender neutral, and the only path forward is for you to get on board and accept my conclusion. I don't see any reason to adjust my language and if you don't want to be called dude that's your problem."

You can just not refer to people with terms they don't want to be referred as, it's pretty simple. You're free to talk to people however you want, but ignoring or arguing with people's requests for how to address them will only ever serve to alienate and isolate you from them.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I felt I was pretty careful in my wording but I guess not.

I don't go around referring to everyone as dude, I said I promote the idea that dude is gender neutral to everyone because it's a fun word.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

No worries, I also assumed the worst and that's my bad. I'm just too used to seeing people whose default response to being challenged on their use of "dude" or "man" is to dig their heels in and argue about it.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

I definitely don't support saying something like "that's a dude" when referring to a woman and won't argue that it's never offensive. I just think it's a fun word non-males shouldn't be denied.

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Would you call a trans woman 'dude'? It's gender neutral after all.

I know it isn't gender neutral, I've shown you why. You know it isn't gender neutral, unless you just told everyone you're happy to call trans women 'dude'. Just be honest about it, what are you really doing when you call trans women 'dude'?

I'm not sure it's the men that get to reclaim gendered words, for the same reason I don't think straight people could reclaim queer words, or white people could reclaim race related words. Can you see why?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Women I know? Yeah lol. I have and I will continue to with the ones I know. We all say dude. Trans or not. With strangers? Probably not unless I'm passing a blunt.

What am I doing when I call a trans woman 'dude'? Usually including her in my inner circle because they know I'm not a chud.

I'm not reclaiming it. I'm encouraging non-males to use it because it's fun. Definitions change with use. Tons of words used to be gendered and aren't now. A famous example is "scientist"

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app -5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

With strangers? Probably not unless I'm passing a blunt.

Why not? Why the hesitancy?

I wouldn't hesitate to call a trans person a person, stranger, friend, acquaintance, buddy, or any number of gender neutral terms. If they're a trans man I wouldn't hesitate to call them dude.

But you, you use dude, you profess to believe that it's a gender neutral term. You wouldn't use it for a trans woman without hesitation? That something to introspect over. Same as you could possibly introspect why you believe dude is a gendered term in all cases, but conveniently not this one. Use dude how you like, just be honest about it.

I'm not reclaiming it. I'm encouraging non-males to use it because it's fun.

This you?

I stand by that dude is gender neutral if for no other reason than to reclaim it as such.

I'm not sure it's for men to reclaim gendered words or encourage non-men to reclaim specific words for my own usage. For the same reason for the same reason I don't think straight people should encourage queer folk to reclaim words to make me more comfortable about using them. Or non white folk should reclaim race words so I can use them. Can you see why?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

Your attempts to psychoanalyze me are falling flat when this is a conversation I've had dozens of times with both men and women. I'm an art school graduate who took a genders studies class that literally discussed the neutralization of vocatives like dude and man

You're stuck on the idea that I go around calling everyone dude when I never said that. Are you going around saying "thanks, buddy" to every cashier? Didn't think so.

Context, tone, and relationships matter. I'm pretty sure if I tripped and instinctually said "thanks dude" or "thanks man" when a trans woman helped me up, it'd be pretty obvious I'm not being a chud. If I said it with a scowl, that'd be a different story

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app 1 points 31 seconds ago

I'm just applying your idea that 'dude' is gender neutral to the world we live in. It isn't you agreed it isn't, except in this one specific context.

Just like the 'dude is gender neutral' homophobic guys get upset when I ask how many dude they've had sex with, you're doing the same thing.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 33 minutes ago

Damn dude, calm down

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yes. But it can be, and is used gender neutral. Words have multiple meanings all the time. Fuck is a great example. It has probably five or ten different uses.

Niether of you are wrong

[–] Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app -4 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago) (1 children)

He/him was used gender neutrally too in instruction manuals. That doesn't mean he/him is a gender neutral term.

It doesn't mean it's right to use he/him as a gender neutral term. It doesn't mean it's right to refer to everyone as he/him. It means we've learned since then.

Just an example, do you now think he/him is a gender neutral term? By all means tell the world that you think he/him is a gender neutral term.

What's easier to believe? He/him/dude are all gender neutral terms and your mum/wife/sister/best friend is a dude referred correctly to a he?

Or that they're gendered terms used incorrectly as we historically have already done so.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 52 minutes ago

Yes we got your point. Are you going to add anything or just repeat yourself?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So, "dudette" has fallen into the waste bin of history, eh?

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 hours ago

Dude is fairly gendered. "mate" on the other hand...