this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
175 points (97.3% liked)

politics

29912 readers
1945 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 4 points 20 hours ago

dumpy mcturdstain must be compensating HARD (teehee) if he needs to plaster his orange turdstain face on everything :/

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

It’ll be the pedo bill.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago

Who carries $250 in cash?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

The PEDOllar bill

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 3 points 21 hours ago

Cool, but no thanks.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s quite untoward to have a pedophile’s visage on any of our currency.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'd love to see some reporter ask Bessent what denomination will have Epstein's face on it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Prince Andrew is on the back.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't a person supposed to be dead first before we put their face on currency? I think the people advocating for this must be wanting it to be true! And wouldn't that be considered a threat to our lovely dearest Sir, King Pedo?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I may be wrong but I think it's American law

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know why they keep using the idiotic looking down portrait of him for everything. He looks so insecure, like he's trying to be tough and failing.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Impressive. Very nice. Let's see Paul Allen's bill.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago

“Strategery.”

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think your right. Even dumber then.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

He looks like Stephen King's evil brother.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

he looks like if george w bush was a mormon

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

My prediction: It'll become the most used bill for fraud, drugs and money laundering!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thayer Amendment - 1866:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Can-a-Living-Person-Appear-on-US-Currency

"The Thayer Amendment: This 1866 law prohibited the use of the image of any living person on “the bonds, securities, notes, or postal currency of the United States.” It was an outgrowth of a silly act of vanity committed by Treasury Department official Spencer Clark, who decided to put himself on banknotes intended to honor explorer William Clark, of Lewis and Clark fame. The congressional bill authorizing the creation of the note only specified that it should honor “Clark,” and so Spencer Clark decided to memorialize himself."

I didn't know the history on that, that's hilarious that it was passed as a "fuck you, in particular!" for one guy!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

silly act of vanity

That's basically everything in PEDOnald's two failed terms.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's not all the US admin has done during that time.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah plenty of acts of petty cruelty as well

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The thing with laws is that Congress can always change them by passing another law....

... but from what I've read, the current text of Joe Wilson's bill carves out an exception for "living and former Presidents". So, if this passes, we may get our Obama $420 bill someday....

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 1 day ago

It's so American that there's precedent for that.

The worst thing about Trump is that everything he does has already been done before; he just accumulates.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

$250 that's a weird denomination. How about the Epstein files?

[–] TheRiskiestBiscuit@reddthat.com 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bessent looks like Jim Carrey playing a cartoonishly over-the-top villain.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bessent always reminds me of that SNL character that Wil Ferrell played - Harry Caray.

Harry Caray was a real person. He was a baseball announcer for the Cubs. I never would have known except that we lived with my uncle for a year, and he watched the Cubs whenever they played.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

$250? Seems a weird denomination. Why not the $47 bill? I'd bet most Americans could scrape together $47 and frame it over their microwave oven. But $250? That's a lot of dough.

Does he know he doesn't get royalties? Or does he? Is there a bill in the works I haven't heard about?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

They're just getting ahead of the curve on inflation. Don't worry, they'll have a $500 and $1000 ready soon enough. Those will be your new $5s and $10s by the time Donald is done with the US.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oh, if you mean PEDOnald, he and his crime family are trying to set up themselves to be bankers to the world via their cryptoschemes and rake in untold sums as a consequence.

Royalties on a denomination no one but his idiotic mouthbreathing cult wants would be chump change in comparison...

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can’t be on currency? Put yourself on a non-circulating “commemorative” bill “for collectors” and sell them. Problem solved. Anyone want to take bets that this is what will happen?

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 18 points 1 day ago

He did that years ago

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I cannot help but wonder how the target demo for velvet paintings of Jesus and Elvis vs. that for bullshit commemorative coins sold that have "easy" installment payments vs. the demo that would snap up these (whether they are legal tender or what you propose may happen) would all stack up on a Venn diagram....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not put him on the $1000 bill… then the $10000… and then the $100000000 bill…heck we could be the next Zimbabwe dollar

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Give it six months.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I've already vowed not to accept any currency with his signature on it. Putting his mug shot on it will only make that easier.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I've already seen anti-Pumkinhead things on currency, this bill is going to be the most defaced currency ever.

Also, Bessent is such a useless suck-up.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Is that brown lipstick Bessent is wearing?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago

And certainly you can trust the word of a grossly unqualified sycophant.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bessent just looks so much like a bad parody of a guy you want to punch in the face.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

He's not a parody, he just should be punched in the face.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bessent: Nothing 'untoward' about fellating Trump

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

He's happily married to another man already.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firstively no other person in US history got to choose which portrait of theirs went on our money.

And secondish the jokes on him because I'll never see it because I never have that much cash anyways.

[–] n01getsout@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Jokes on us because with his inflation, soon we will all be using those to buy a loaf of bread.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly if inflation gets that bad then between forcibly stagnant wages and everything else going on there's a non-zero chance we won't see that. Because the economy will probably be collapsed or we will be trading around literal food stamps issued by the states and largely given out to CCC like organizations. Y'know assuming we don't just see everything implode like with the Late Bronze Age collapse, after all trade is a lifeblood to all and a certain orange dipshit is pissing into an open bleeding wound.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›