this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
137 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

6864 readers
847 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In these uncertain and divisive times, we appreciate Anthropic offering support to the Blender project in the form of a Patron-level membership. This enables the Blender team to keep pursuing projects independently, and to focus on building tools for artists and creators.

Francesco Siddi, CEO at Blender

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

idk why i like when Corporations donate/contribute to open source projects .

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Remember, guys; being a patron of an open source project is not the same as being an investor at a company.

[–] TacticalToothbrush@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Discussion on Blender Artists forum. If you want extra cortisol today.

edit:
My prediction... their 2026 financial report gonna see a huge drop for small donation from individuals.

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

FOSS users:

Big tech leeches off FOSS and never gives back!

Also FOSS users:

These big tech companies should stay out of our favorite projects, thei money is poison!

And this is why we can't have nice things.

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Well yeah, capitalists playbook.

Give money to thing, people who do thing are grateful but wary. People who do thing are able to do more thing with the money and become reliant on the money, then corporation starts putting the lean on them to push agenda while threatening to pull funding that the thing needs now.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

They support well established projects and foundations that broke the corporate glass to push their agenda on those projects but not single user projects that they use in their closed source software.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For anyone worried Blender is not only open source but the foundation is nonprofit and open of how their funding works.

Meaning you can code audit Blender to see if Claude is getting in it but you can indeed follow the money and see what the foundation is spending corporate donors on

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Claude is already there, has been for a while.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 day ago

The question now is the Claude Code Gen AI type situation or core code to work

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's more worrying that Blender has been merging Claude code for a while now. Maybe Anthropic is going to give main devs free tokens now to incentivate the use.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will continue to happen and every piece of software you use will contain generated code in the next decade.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Lol I love how these confident comments about how "AI is the future so get used to it" always get ratio'd because it really shows how delusional people like you are.

Most people are not brainwashed about this like you.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Blender will be fine. They can't make changes without going through pull requests and audits. At most, you might see some kind of Claude add-on. Totally opt-in.

...Until we're convinced otherwise, of course.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if Blender's actually received any actual real money from Anthropic, or if its just like, money hasn't actually changed hands yet.

I know its not uncommon for big open source projects to accept money and sponsorships from corporations, but idk where Anthropic would really get the cash to even do this. AFAIK they're still staying afloat on investor cash and are burning way more money running models than they can realistically charge people to use them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago

This is the other reason Blender should steer clear of Anthropic.

AI is a bullshit industry that isn't profitable and it is all going to collapse sooner or later, Blender should pursue sponsors that are actual profitable businesses that will be around in 5 years.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As a man of wealth and taste, I am also interested in sponsoring Blender.

[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a man of wealth and taste

What's puzzling me is the nature of their game... (Cit.)

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I hope you guessed their name.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Welp, that's Blender fucked then. It's just a matter of time.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know a bunch of other companies you may dislike also fund blender too, right?

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many of them are known to make a tool that ruins everything it touches?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

I looked up the list and laughed. A lot.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Doesn't sound that bad, does it?

A lot of open source projects take money from companies to develop their stuff.

It's not like Blender is forced to integrate AI now.

I think this is a net good.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I may just be being overly cynical, but once big corporations start giving money to these kinds of things, it's not a big stretch for them to start influencing things in their favour for their money. I hope I'm wrong.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope you're wrong too!

I believe projects are not all the same. Some projects might be quick to bend the knee, but others would never.

Depends how the Blender team works I guess :)

It is FOSS, so if it takes a turn to the worse I am sure they will be forked quickly 😄

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I am sure they will be forked quickly

ooh-err Missus!

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bro how do you think Blender has been getting money all this time?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't really been keeping abreast of the situation. I'm only going by a gut reaction to this article. I'm happy to be proven wrong about this.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They are sponsored by major corps like nvidia, meta,amd. Despite this they've continued to put out a good Foss product. I think they'll resist undue influence from antropic.

But I do think they'll integrate ai inas they're working on that at the moment.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

Fucking disappointing as hell, Blender has so much potential and getting side tracked into useless AI crap will be a massive drain on productivity and improvement on the core Blender software.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s not like Blender is forced to integrate AI now.

from anthropic’s announcement: "The Blender developers have created an MCP connector, which is now officially available for Claude."

MCP stands for "modern context protocol" and is a tech developed by anthropic for ai integration. in effect, yes, blender is forced to integrate ai. not claude specifically, mind you, but still.

[–] Escape13@slrpnk.net 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It’s ’model complex protocol’ and you can’t stop people from making them to integrate with software. Basically you can create instructions so that the agent can use other software. I bet even w/o entropic there are already more than one on GitHub.

It blew my mind when I played with the godot mcps for the first time not gonna lie.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, but how bad is that?

It is just an interface, or am i missing something here?

Anthropic has no control over the project.

They sponsored a feature that is still open to anyone to use or not use.

The project is intact for all I can tell?

[–] greenashura@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Think about MCPs as an API for AI. It's just an interface that let's AI do a set of predetermined tasks/configurations. It'll very likely be used for model generation via a prompt

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 0 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, i get the gist of it.

Its just that I don't really see a problem with Blender creating an API.

There are 2 options:

  1. AI will become awesome and take over the world. In this case I don't see how Blender would survive regardless of MCP integration status.
  2. AI will always be shite, Blender devs has implemented a useless API and got a lot of cash to keep developing Blender.

I don't see how this is bad, honestly.

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They just partnered with Adobe. I have mixed feelings about this, as someone working in the creative industries. I have used AI to do some amazing things, and recently figured out how to use Claude to automate some boring, non-creative and time-consuming worklflows. This all, in theory is freeing me up to spend more time on the fun creative stuff, the problem is that nobody values creativity any more because they can just outsource that to AI.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This was never about bots being able to make art, they can't, they can only steal it from humans and throw it into a woodchipper and then try to duct tape it back together.

This was about dehumanizing human artists and I am INCREDIBLY unimpressed by how so many artists have leaned into this dehumanization without any reflection over whether this is actually a future or just a way to permanently reduce the quality of life of digital human artists by culturally associating them with algorithmic robots even though the human output is 1000% more creative.