this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
273 points (96.9% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16464 readers
209 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kilmer passed away in 2025 after battling throat cancer. Apparently his character will feature in over an hour of the movie.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/val-kilmer-ai-generated-new-movie-rcna264195

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope no one watches this, simply out of basic respect for the dead.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

But if anybody does go to see it, it would be interesting to interview them all to get a character/personality profile of the types who'd go to see this disrespectful disgraceful thing

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I mean, this isn't really a new thing, they did the same with Paul Walker for Fast and Furious

Something Something beating a dead ai horse

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

No, no, no and no

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Oy. Soon we're gonna have a separate word for films that starred a particular actor when they were actually alive, as distinguished from the rest of the films starring them.

I should rewatch The Congress.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Well, that's creepy af

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait...

Val Kilmer is dead?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 181 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They've finally done it. Even if You're dead, you still have to fucking go to work.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago

Which was the point of the movie Robocop, and he got featured in the reboot of it.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The dead can't organize labor unions either.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

This is so weird to me. Are we really at a point where we need recreate old, dead actors instead of giving new actors a shot?

Like could you imagine if we had this technology a hundred years ago and just decided that Charlie Chaplin was the best, so let's just clone his likeness and put him in everything? You'd never have a John Wayne, a Robert DeNiro, a Harrison Ford, or a Tom Hanks. Just a recreation of Charlie Chaplin in every major movie - because it's cheaper and less risky to recreate someone old with AI than it is to take a chance on someone new.

This timeline is dumb as hell.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Issue is, movie execs see even CinemaSins style critique as valid, so they try their best to avoid "the protagonist looks different from what he looked like in the previous episode ding". They even tanked SW IX to try to win over chuds, only to alienate everyone.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's just cheaper and people are not yet accepting AI actors, so bringing back a known actor is step 1.

Studios would LOVE to replace all the actors and writers with cheap AI slop.

I mean they already tried and faced massive backlash. So they're going about it more carefully now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If they're going to use AI for actors, how about we start with replacing child actors? Between Hollywood's shitty treatment of children, the effects that fame has on developmental growth, and the pure cost of hiring children (who have shorter work hours and thus tend to increase the time required to film/produce), it would make a lot more sense to replace kids on screen with a bot than attempting to raise adult actors from the dead.

I'm no fan of AI, but considering how much child abuse happens behind the scenes, using it to reduce the need for child actors is one application I'd feel at least somewhat okay with. But this? It just feels disrespectful to the dead actor. Holograms of dead people was bad enough, now we need to recreate entire films with them?

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Half the point of Hollywood is abuse. Literally that's the reason investment ever went into the idea. No one just provides bread and circuses, and just one justification is no where near good enough to excuse the massive costs.

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 3 days ago (17 children)

So they're just making money over a dead guy's likeness. Business as usual then.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lemmywinksthegerbilking@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

js let actors (really, anyone for that matter) die in peace bruh 😭😭🙏

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A cousin of mine died about a year ago, after a long struggle with cancer. “She” still posts on Facebook. It makes me sick.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is this Facebook doing this, or a family member posting on their behalf?

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

None of our family would impersonate her.

https://futurism.com/future-society/meta-patented-ai-die-keeps-posting

These articles claim Facebook has no plans to use this patent, but this is very mich like what I’m seeing.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 24 points 2 days ago

Sounds like the perfect movie to never watch.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would say that if no one paid to see the movie maybe studios would quit doing this, but there are usually a lot of people who don't know or don't care about any given shitty thing, so things get slowly worse.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's the flow of the world. The vast majority doesn't know and doesn't care. We all get what we deserve in the end though...

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

No, we just get what we get.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Usually i wonder "Oh, xyz is still alive?", feels werid to wonder "Oh, xyz is dead? When did that happen?"

Is this a getting-old thing? :(

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I’m 55 and wonder both. I think it’s a realizing your own mortality thing.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dude had a lot of health problems. Top Gun was his last hurrah, and it was difficult for him. It's why his screen time was so short, and why they ended up honoring him with a funeral scene. If I remember correctly, he died while the film was being made, so they added that scene last minute.

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Top Gun was his last hurrah

For a minute I thought you meant the original Top Gun, and I was thinking "well Batman Forever kinda sucked, yeah, but you've obviously never seen Tombstone" then I realized you meant the "Maverick" movie. I never watched it and didn't even know he was in it.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

realized you meant the “Maverick” movie. I never watched it and didn’t even know he was in it.

He was for a brief moment.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago
[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

that doesn't even look like him.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 10 points 2 days ago

It looks like someone tried to make Tom Cruise look like Val Kilmer.

Maybe if we see an era of AI reducing people’s individuality and throwing them all into an uncanny valley of blended-together appearances, we’ll wind up with a resurgence of interest in actors with atypical features.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›