this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
550 points (96.6% liked)

Fuck AI

6885 readers
837 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess I'm glad I was never a big Twat, so Bluesky wasn't a place of refuge for me the way Lemmy was when Reddit went off the rails.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 147 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I had a nickel for every time a corpo CEO who founded a microblogging social media platform stepped down to pursue even shittier corpo endeavors, I'd have two nickels, which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice, right?

[–] FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The irony is that Doofenshmirtz is pretty good standin for an out of touch corpo CEO

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Even Doofenshmirtz wouldn't stoop so low.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In one of the Season 5 episodes, Doof runs a gym as a front to get people to power his building, so he's not too far off...

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

How do you figure? That’s environmentalism at its finest

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Doof was helping people get healthy, and using their healthy output so the power they generate didn't go to waste!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 130 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Everything was pointing Mastodon until Bluesky came. And guess what? Turns out the problem is and always has been corporations and centralized ownership.

[–] null@lemmy.org 46 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Mastodon has shit branding and I'm not afraid to say it.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In general, I'd say the fediverse as a whole has shit branding and is probably a bit too confusing and/or too much initial setup work for the average inertnet user.

But I'm glad it's like that, to a degree, because it helps lower the amount of people overwhelming places like here with all the people who would gladly allow the place to be overrun by ads and corporate astroturfing.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The barrier to entry acts as a filter. Which is crazy to me, because it’s still so easy to sign up and conceptualize, imo.

I guess it just goes to show how accustomed people have become to uncanny and frankly insane levels of convenience.

I remember the first time I logged in to Gmail without putting my password in — when all of a sudden the entire internet used cookies in lieu of credentials (is that how it works? I’m not qualified).

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I can absolutely understand that it's difficult to conceptualise. For someone who already understands, the concept is dead simple.

But I still remember the confusion trying to join Mastodon all those years ago. You are shown a list of servers, huh? Never being introduced to the concept of federated social media, just being asked makes you feel like you don't belong because you don't understand what's happening.

Ok, so you search around and work out that it's across many servers. You now have to somehow pick a server with no frame of reference. Pick randomly and hope you don't pick the lemmdgrad equivalent (which is always high on the list on join-lemmy.com BTW). Then you go to join and you have to apply - oh, but what if they don't want me? How do they know who I am, why would they approve my application?

Each one of these things is a barrier to entry, they stack like swiss cheese so that very few people make it through.

Then there's the part where all these people have friends that could help them through it, but the friends never mention the fediverse to them because of the whole don't talk about thing. I am guilty of this.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 115 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Corporate owned entities will always enshitify.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is why I moved away from Gitea to Forgejo. Nothing wrong with Gitea. I just can't trust the corporate model anymore, especially not for something as critical as my code repos.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

Oh damn. It's rotten all the way to the core.

Oh wait. I'm on mastodon. The correct platform to have migrated to

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 53 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok it's not BlueSky as in the BlueSky social media website. It's another separate tool they're developing.

The title is very misleading.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bsky enhittified the day it was formed.
The problem: Twitter is being centrally controlled, by one large corporation which can be corrupted.
The solution: A new "company" with a "trusted board" instead of investors!
Bsky is slowly becoming twitter because someone who thinks like businessman can't comprehend running a project without a company and a "trusted board" behind it, with capital from elsewhere fueling the whole thing. Jack Dorsey probably had good intentions, but he's just too near sighted (or not the right person) to create a viable alternative disconnected from the business minded framework a true open decentralized twitter replacement needed.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's basically just Twitter in the early days, way before the Musk takeover. It will follow the same path eventually, as all VC funded tech

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

People forget that Twitter turned to shit long before musk showed up. They were the ones who refused to enforce their own TOS for trump for years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Use mastodon and the fediverse

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

Dude, not trying to throw shade at Mastodon, but where on Lemmy I get tons of interaction, on Pixelfed and Loops I get a solid amount and on Bluesky I get plenty in comments and some on my own posts...

I have had ZERO ANYTHING on Mastodon, and the content I post is more or less the same as the others. The app looks sleek and upload quality is better than the others, but it feels like being shadowbanned on Meta... Photos, memes, text, political, personal, you name it, nothing.

I make a point to use each of these apps once a day. No one is reciprocating anything on Mastodon. Again, it feels like being shadowbanned. I honestly hate it at this point. I'm trying to engage with those people and they're giving me nothing.

Maybe it's literally a technical issue, no joke. Or maybe I'm like the old lady in the "If my phone isn't broken then why don't my relatives call me?" story

EDIT: I'm surprised to hear I'm not alone. I thought my little rant would get downvoted. Well, dang! We need to fix Mastodon then!

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How it feels to be vindicated for not trusting/buying-in to a new fad

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The bluesky rise kinda pissed me off. More so because all my artist friends that were on twitter went to bluesky instead of Mastodon when I told them about it as an alternative. everyone collectively decided to ignore a system that already existed and to the centralized thing again. Big suprise.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bluesky was easier to sign up and less confusing to use. It had a much better mobile app. A lot of pro newsies came to Mastodon and were roundly ejected and abused, so they up and went to Blurdky instead. That was a major shooting your own foot moment for Mastodon because those newsies would have brought engaged audience. I saw people celebrating at Mastodon when news reporters up and quit. Idiotic. I hope the Lemmy community doesn't repeat that mistake.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 month ago

Lemmy's been stable and perfectly enjoyable for years.

I'd like to see it grow but even if it doesn't I'm cool with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FE80@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Jay Graber is not CEO anymore, but that doesn't mean she hasn't been busy.

Valorizing CEOs is for idiots and suckers.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does it come from the US?

Is it open source?

Are the people behind it overwhelmingly wealthy?

If (TRUE, FALSE, TRUE) 100% you should stay away from it.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd swap "open source: false" with "closed source: true" so the pattern is consistent.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 11 points 1 month ago

I considered it but not closed source doesn't automatically mean open source so I preferred to be more rigorous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No surprise. Y'all are dumb if you think the point of all social media isn't to just make money.

[–] versionc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does that include Lemmy and Mastodon?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Both of those are federated options with no central company behind them. They have issues, but not because they have a corporate algorithm feeding their users.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

For those curious it sounds like the app is an ai powered discovery tool, where you tell it what kinda stuff you like and it tries to find stuff from across bsky to show you based on your interests you told it about

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FWIW

Most of the people I know who moved to Bluesky instead of Mastodon specifically cited the ability to easily index/discover stuff from a single location as the reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago

With Attie, users apparently enter what are essentially chatbot prompts. The app will process whatever the user types, find posts they might be into across Bluesky and other atpro-friendly networks, and use that to customize their feed and overall experience.

It sounds like a stupid app, but of everything going on, this is just not something I care about.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

I knew it. Investors started pouring in, it was only a matter of time.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As fake as it may sound, chief innovation officer is a real job title

Oh wow, an AI feature that nobody asked for. Such innovation, much wow!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

From the article:

New Bluesky CEO Toni Schneider told TechCrunch, “We’ve launched a lot of things inside Bluesky — Starter Packs and custom feeds, and all those kinds of things. This is a standalone product, and it’s the first one that’s built by Jay’s new team.” [emphasis added]

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As long as it's open source and customizable, I don't see the problem with this.

It's not bad that we have algorithms to find content. I'm sorting the comments of this thread with an algorithm

The key is that I can choose which algorithm I want to sort by, that algorithm is open source, and I can write my own algorithm, if I want.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 1 month ago

took a role as chief innovation officer of the social media platform.

Uhmmm.... chief what...?

As fake as it may sound

LOL exactly what I thought.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

At some point they are going to have to make money.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Social media in general don't need to. Atpor servers operators in general don't need to. But Bluesky does, because it's accountable in front of its investors. So yes, they do have to make money, and no, there is no solution that does not go with some level of enshittification. And then they'll get pressed to make more money, to grow their revenues every year. And it can only go down from there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago

It's funny, I bailed when they started doing age checks. It made my life better

[–] zenzanzoo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It seems this fediverse thing is the real innovation, not twitter clones.

[–] visch@quokk.au 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really wonder if Mastodon would have done better with a nicer, more techy name. Also, it’s silly but the double @ usernames look worse than the AT proto usernames.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I know this goes against the whole culture but we are going to do it anyway -Digg, Reddit, Twitter, Bluesky, etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›