this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
608 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

19845 readers
3066 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 198 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Imagine using something dangerous to generate power or heat for a home. Something that if it leaks into your home could suffocate you overnight or explode, or that in normal use can give children respiratory issues or cause cancer. Thank goodness we're too smart to use something like that unlike the absolute imbeciles in this comic

[–] lengau@midwest.social 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine if we had to move it around in such large quantities that there were thousands of kilometres of unwatched pipelines just out there, potentially leaking.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago

And imagine people fight pointless wars over resources instead of using the renewables that are available for free.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not only that, but mining for it produces massive quantities of dangerous runoff and radioactive waste. Good thing coal doesn't do that!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 55 points 1 week ago (5 children)

“Junior please walk 30cm to the left and do this task that would have been easier for me to do than ask you to do it”

[–] modus@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

It's just one of those things you can do yourself, but you want the kid to feel valuable too.

Besides, if you're getting radiation poisoning, you want that little shit to go down with you.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's faster, cleaner, and far more efficient for me to clean my kids' dinner plates.

And if I always do it, they'll never do it on their own.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

30cm can make a big difference

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty sure that kid's arm would hang down to his ankle if he straightened it. Must be all those atomic wafers.

[–] zout@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago

He's actually the bass player in a metal band.

[–] RedFrank24@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

That's not his arm.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Kilowat"

Might have questioned the reliability of that information source even back then already...

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, the kilo-wat. For when a simple "wat" doesn't accurately capture the absurdity of the situation.

For example, asking junior to put an atomic wafer in the power box, when you are standing right fucking next to it.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's 1024 Wats, so a kibiWat, not a kiloWat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

But a picture is worth a thousand words!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 1 week ago

She can't do it, her eyes fell off because of the radiations.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I guess renewables are still cheaper.

At least personally and anecdotally, because it doesn't happen often, but it has happened more than once, that I have purchased electricity at negative prices due to overflow from renewables, which is a hell of lot cheaper than paying a tenth of a cent per kilowatt hour.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (18 children)

no radioactive waste to deal with either.

and with solar, most of the hardware can be recycled now into new units; with a 20 year lifespan, that's going to pull thousands of kilowatts out of the sky, that'll do just fine.

https://www.pv-tech.org/a-billion-dollar-industry-inside-the-growing-solar-panel-recycling-sector-in-the-us/

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My main thing with solar is I wish they'd put panels over existing parking lots or large buildings. This is a thing that is already done in some places, this is a solved engineering problem, but in my area anywhere a solar farm has sprung up it's been a field that previously either grew crops or was undeveloped woods. And I know the reason someone's going to come back with: To install solar awnings over an existing Wal Mart parking lot, you need to tear up the asphalt to install power lines, build the actual structure, permitting is probably more expensive, and you have to have some or all of the parking lot down for awhile during construction restricting the use of the store. Meanwhile, clear cut 10 acres of forest and you get lumber to sell to a paper mill.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I disagree, only thinking we should cover EVERYTHING - any human building / structure etc should have solar all over. yeah, it's not cheap to build them, but we should stop playing fuckaround and get it done, it'll be cheaper to do it today than tomorrow.

But re: fields - they can do double duty via agrivoltaics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel like "Atomic Wafer" should be a band name

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Or as slang for a tab of LSD

why do i feel like Radioactive Buttplug is both already a band and an approved medical device

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Could you imagine a world where we first used atomic power for good and not evil?

[–] Emi@ani.social 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't know history of uranium very much but wasn't it first used to paint ceramics and later radium for glowing watches? Uranium bombs were made later probably after it was used to generate power. But I wonder what our world would look like if there was not as much scare of nuclear power. Perhaps bit like fallouts world? We still have some time left to 23rd October 2077 thankfully.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The first man made reactor (there's an extinct naturally occurring one) was created in 1942 as part of the Manhattan project to create the first bombs. So we really did speed run the tech tree for bomb on that one. The first nuclear power plant was in 1951.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First use: glowing paint
Second use: cancer

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if there was not as much scare of nuclear power.

I was pro nuclear until solar became cheaper than nuclear but I think if there was less scare about nuclear, there would have been more Chernobyls. That happened because of thinking it's completely safe.

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chernobyl happened through the incompetence of leadership, not because they thought it was "completely safe".

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a good thing leadership incompetence is something that only ever happens once

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Incompetence AND overconfidence, cause those reactors were the latest generation and considered completely safe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I was pro-nuclear until Georgia Power stuck me with the bill for Plant Vogtle 3 and 4.

(Or rather, I was pro-nuclear until shortly after construction began on a 7-year plan that ultimately took 15 years, when it started to become clear that gross incompetence and corruption was going to make it an expensive debacle.)

Nuclear power from Vogtle 3 and 4 costs 16¢ per kWh (according to the linked document), by the way, compared to less than 0.1¢ per kWh expected by OP's comic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mactrl@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

tell me you dont understand how nuclear-powered energy without telling me you dont understand nuclear-powered energy

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago

Beta-voltaic batteries are fairly safe, work for 50 years, no recharging.

Almos tuseless at like 0.1 milliwats.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

It's easy: just boil some water

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So was the popular conception back then that power was somehow magically transferred directly from uranium to the power grid?

[–] Forester@pawb.social 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Miniature breeder reactor

You would drop in the uranium fuel source and it would be used to create more fuel.

Short version is most early nuclear science focused on breeder type reactors but they were abandoned when it was found that more conventional designs are a lot more feasible for producing weapons grade material.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What grid? It looks like the "power box" on the wall is generating power for that house all by itself, no transmission necessary.

Considering that the smallest operating nuclear reactor ever made was this big...

SNAP-10A nuclear reactor

...and that critical mass is a thing, I can only assume the "power box" was some kind of RTG.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The radiation explains why his right arm is long enough that he could scratch his shins standing up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

*Licks powerbox*

load more comments
view more: next ›