this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
228 points (95.6% liked)

science

25185 readers
780 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The article is missing the point.

It's easier to do. Duh.

Of course the real way to lose weight is Calories In, Calories Out. Anyone who thinks there's some secret sauce special magic in South Beach, Paleo, Vegan, Low-Carb, Keto, Intermittent Fasting, Alternate Day Fasting is just reducing their caloric intake as a by-product of their "diet".

It's always been Calories In, Calories Out. It's just easier to lower your intake by fasting sometimes. Trying to eat small, sensible meals suuuucks.

Even GLP-1s work by turning off hunger so you don't want to cram food in your face all the time. So you eat less calories...

It's not rocket surgery.

If it works, then it works.

[–] dust4ngel@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

the title is saying “particular way of achieving X no different than simply achieving X.” agree, any way of achieving X achieves X - the question is how do you do it

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Right, but it's not special is all, or innately more effective.

However one can control their intake, that's what works.

It is special, at least to me. I don't even think about food until like 8pm.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago

IF probably works for some people because it reduces food noise for them.

Anything you can do to reduce food noise allows you to eat less, allows you to lose weight

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 46 points 19 hours ago (11 children)

So, it works? I've been thinking of trying it since it's probably the only diet I could achieve.

[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

It works for me. Been accidentally doing it since I was 13. Parents didn't give me an allowance, but they did give me lunch money, so if I wanted to buy games I had to skip lunch. Never went back and I've always been a healthy weight without much exercise.

Coffee for breakfast, water all day, and a double serving size of dinner. Lately, with the rising cost of food, I have been doing a lighter dinner and supplementing with a protein shake for lunch.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I do it all the time. I eat around 7:30pm and don't eat until 1:00 p the next day. Usually have only 1 or 2 meals a day. Breakfast is bullshit. Most important meal my ass. I do just fine without it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's the most important meal of the day if you make a living selling breakfast food.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Or if you do heavy labor everyday. Or if you're a student trying to learn. Or anything else that requires activity or mental acuity.

Sitting in a cubical being non-productive, yeah breakfast don't mean so much.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Still not "most important". It was purely a marketing ploy to sell breakfast junk.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I usually get stomach aches and feel sick if I eat breakfast so yeah. None of that for me please

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

This has pretty much always happened to me too! You are not alone!

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago

If you find it easier to skip a meal than to stop eating, go for it.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 30 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. 16-8 fasting is just, skip breakfast and don't snack at midnight. It's just an easy way to restrict calories.

And I know that there's no science behind this, but anecdotally I feel better when I give my digestive system a bit of a break.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comador@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. Works. I'd suggest looking at the types, which are basically schedules:

https://www.everydayhealth.com/diet-nutrition/diet/types-intermittent-fasting-which-best-you/

I'd also suggest looking into some charts that help you decide how much you can lose based on your height/weight/age/sex.

https://simple.life/blog/intermittent-fasting-by-age-chart/

Trial, error, stick to a schedule and it works; yes.

[–] krakenx@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

There are a lot of reports of simple.life being a scam app. Charging people more than they agreed on and not honoring requests to cancel, being auto-subscribed to other 'offers', and the app not providing the info they claim it does. I filled out their questionnaire but did a bit of digging and stopped before giving them any payment. They still have my info though...

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

So, it works?

Yep. I've hard it all comes down to calories out minus calories in.

Really anything that comfortably and sustainably controls calories in, for your individual lifestyle and metabolism, is going to work.

For some people, I imagine that could be intermittent fasting.

Personally, I just got out of the habit of eating breakfast, at some point, and I found it helped control my total daily calorie intake. (I don't know if that counts as intermittent fasting?)

The key thing I had to internalize is that my "diet" can not just be something I do for awhile - it has to be my new normal, for any positive change to stick.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 16 points 19 hours ago

It's not terrible after you get used to it. I just naturally started skipping breakfast when I moved out, read the meme, thought there might be something to this. Did a little reading and was on the daily type for about two years and have fallen into the weekly type in the last year or so naturally. I lost tons of weight, granted I started working out too. But I've been maintaining it just fine without being too strict with myself.

It's not for everyone, but it was a good fit for me.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I've been doing something OMAD-like for about 4 or 5 months now. Went from 210lbs to 190lbs today. Here's what I was doing:

  1. Each week, set a goal weight that is 1-2 lbs lower than your current weight/last week's goal. The leaner you get, the harder it is to lose, so having a goal of 1 or even 1/2 lbs can be good for lean people. I'm 6'4" and decently athletic. Right now at 190, I'm starting to show abs, so my goal rn is 1/2lb per week.
  2. Each morning, wake up and weigh yourself. If you are at or below this week's goal weight, great! Have a nice breakfast. If not, no breakfast. Then, skip lunch. Sometime in the evening, eat dinner. No need to beat yourself up if dinner isn't perfect, but obviously, eating tacos at home is better than ordering a pizza.
  3. Using a little text document on your phone or whatever, write down everything you eat every day. I hate estimating portion sizes, and instead just record for the sake of tracking food quality - typically if I eat pizza and beer and cake, I gain weight, lol.
  4. Each week, review your progress and your food log. Did you achieve your goal? If so, celebrate! If not, review your food journal. Ask yourself - did you cheat or eat unhealthy foods? If so, why? And do you regret it? I think it is fine to have a slice of cake at someone's party every once in a while, and I don'r regret that it might slow my progress a little. But if I go to McD's 5 nights a week, then I'll regret that. So then, you reflect on why you did the things you not regret, and ask yourself if there is some way you can make it easier to avoid these temptations in the future - like having dinner made already at home (crockpots ftw!), or finding a way to reduce stress in your life so you are less interested in binge eating.

I will also note that I exercise quite a lot. I lift, I go rock climbing, I go hiking. Sometimes I play hacky sack or pickleball or ultimate frisbee. I recommend exercising as well - it isn't necessary according to CICO, but we all know it helps. Find some kind of fun, social exercise that you can keep coming back to and enjoying.

Another note: many people will feel like the progress I've made is quite minimal and slow. In my defence, (1) I'm already pretty lean relative to most people with body comp goals (2) this has been an extremely painless and very sustainable process and (3) losing weight slowly is the way to go, as it preserves muscle mass and ensures your diet is sustainable long term.

[–] Longmactoppedup@aussie.zone 9 points 18 hours ago

Just try it and see if it works for you.

I've found one or two 20h fasts per week very effective at shedding fat without losing too much muscle mass. Much less effort than counting macros every day.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 17 hours ago

I know a lot of people that have lost weight using that method. I don't have weight problems but it's the method I use when I'm cutting and it works as I expect it to. I think it's probably the best way to get used to eating less. The trick is not gorging yourself when you do eat.

[–] PoorYorick@lemmy.world 106 points 22 hours ago (19 children)

Of course, it's not better. There is no way around the laws of thermodynamics. Weight loss is a measure of taking in fewer calories than you burn. That's the formulae.

That said, intermittent fasting can be a great way for some people to manage their caloric intake. Some people just find it easier to manage their calories by eating once or twice a day and restricting themselves at others.

At the end of the day, though it's not meant to be a panacea, it's a tool to be used for those that prefer it to other options.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 1 points 40 minutes ago

Is it meant to be a panna cotta then?

Or a panettone?

God I'm hungry.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago

Of course, it's not better. There is no way around the laws of thermodynamics.

Well said. No diet is going to magic away the math. Haha.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›