this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
156 points (97.0% liked)

Canada

11445 readers
998 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Threeskittiesinatrenchcoat@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

Fact of the matter is if ICE wanted to round up Canadians, most local police, at least in Alberta, would be helping to support ICE operations while making a canned statement on TV about the legality of their actions.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You all need to be pressing your government to declare ICE a terrorist organization so that you can bar entry of any current or former member into the country.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

we have ICE offices in canada, in a bunch if our major cities, including ottawa. our capital.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. You might want to try to correct that.

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

there are none in my city, but if one does end up here. the plan is to burn it.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We need to start protesting to get ICE out of Canada

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Here's an idea. If ICE walks across the border, shoot them. They're a hostile foreign invader.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 13 hours ago

Because if they did I'd have the right to kill them as an invading force. Fuck ice may they all die.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 78 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

I believe I, and any Canadian, have every right to kill a person who represents a foreign (hostile)government, and tries to abduct me, or those I care about in my country. As they do not represent my government, I believe I’m free and clear.

No authority?

No process?

It is then an act of war, and we should respond accordingly with deadly force.

Just sayin.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This is one of the first times I’ve heard a Canadian threatening without saying sorry first.

Shit must be gettin’ tough

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago

The most polite people I know are also the most willing to stand up against wrong doing when the time comes. They are they way they are because they value good prosocial behaviour, they're willing to sacrifice their own convenience for it, and they're willing to defend it.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 30 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Ash@piefed.social 11 points 14 hours ago

It's aboot time. (sorry)

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Sohry, not sohry, eh!

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 18 points 13 hours ago

We are polite…..until we aren’t. That’s how the Geneva Convention was created.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 18 points 14 hours ago
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well. I mean, attempt armed arrest anyway and hope they don't start shooting. That's just polite.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

As they are not empowered by a Canadian government, they may not carry firearms unless they have an express act to do so. This may in fact be the case under a blanket act for border agents. We should review that…

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 47 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Canadians are chomping at the bit here to get a reason to go burn down the Whitehouse again.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

From a grizzled, old, Scottish WWII veteran: “Young Man, I’ll tell ya something I learned in the war, never, ever underestimate those Canadians! They are the toughest soldiers I encountered in the war.”

FTR: he also said he thought Germans were pansies, lol.

Dead now, but he was a tough SOB, himself (I mean, he WAS Scottish, so that’s a pedigree right there).

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Many of us Canadians still have some Scottish blood. And I bet it works as well as it ever did.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

Hah I wish. Society is to soft abdicated to screens and comfort. As long as the masses are entertained almost anything can happen.

[–] locotx@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It's "champing" at the bit.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You're a true chompion of the English language.

[–] Gerblat@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I’ll drink to that

gulps down a mouthful of chompagne

[–] ryanpdg1@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's only chompagne if it comes from the chompagne region of Fronce

[–] NebulaNymph@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago

True, otherwise it's just sporkling wine

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They're generally both considered correct. "Chomping at the bit" has been in use for over 100 years.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Language, where you just have to be wrong long enough that your version becomes a dialect.

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

It's literally the worst.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 hours ago

Champing at the bit sounds dumb af tbh and I've never heard it before IRL compared to chomping.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

After a LOT of rabbit holes, …it’s both.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

I thought it was the brittish that did that during the war of 1812?

[–] L_N@piefed.ca 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We must prepare for potential ICE agressive incursions into our territory.
We must be ruthless against fascism.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Karl Popper had it right.

Do not tolerate intolerance and the behavior seen from the south.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

The question is: would a Canadian citizen witnessing an ICE kidnapping happen in Canada be allowed to use up to lethal force to stop it?

[–] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago

I don't care. I'm not an American gimp. I'll help a person being kidnapped or harassed in Canada. If it's a US MAGA Nazi fuck, they'll get a mother fucking double-double. I'll take the chance.

Fuck ICE.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago

No. But if there's no body there's no murder.

[–] TomatoPotato69@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It would be animal abuse at worst. So just make sure it's fast, clean, and humane. ;)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Aha, so baaically if you get snatched and dragged into the US for suspected violation of US law, the American legal system is okay with it and you have limited avenues to defend yourself. Canada would have to "convince" the US to let you go. In other words, exercise higher caution around ICE than our neighbours do.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 14 hours ago

There is no rule of law here. :( we have do much with to do :(

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 18 points 16 hours ago

I'd love to see them try. And I think many Canadians are also chomping at the bit to "see America try". Lets see how far they get up here.

load more comments
view more: next ›